-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation - methods of preparation and preservation
M. Polachova, M. Netukova, O. Benada, T. Kucera, V. Kolin, AD. Baxant, Z. Sirolova, P. Studeny
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
350321
Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
350321
Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-04-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- dimethylsulfoxid MeSH
- glycerol * MeSH
- hypotermie * MeSH
- kolagen MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- rohovka chirurgie MeSH
- stroma rohovky chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: The goal of our study is to find an optimal approach to the preparation and preservation of corneal stromal tissue. We want to compare different methods of corneal stromal tissue creation and storage to optimize the efficacy of this process under the conditions of an eye bank. After we find the most suitable method to create a safe high quality product, we want to prove the possibility of using a single donor cornea for more than one patient. We would also like to verify the feasibility of making more corneal lenticules after the removal of a corneal endothelium for DMEK transplantation. METHODS: We provided morphological (histology, scanning electron microscope) and microbiological analysis in order to compare different methods of corneal lenticule and corneal stromal lamellae preparation and preservation. We also tested the surgical handling of the tissue to secure a safe manipulation of the tissue for clinical use. We compared two methods of corneal lenticule preparation: microkeratome dissection and femtosecond laser. As methods of preservation, we tested hypothermia, cryopreservation at -80 degrees Celsius in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and storage at room temperature with glycerol. Some intrastromal lenticules and lamellae in each group were previously irradiated with gamma radiation of 25 kGy (KiloGray). RESULTS: Corneal stromal lamellae prepared with a microkeratome have a smoother cut - side surface compared to lamellae prepared with a femtosecond laser. Femtosecond laser preparation caused more irregularities on the surface and we detected more conglomerates of the fibrils, while lamellae made with microkeratome had more sparse network. Using femtosecond laser, we were able to make more than five lenticules from a single donor cornea. Gamma irradiation led to damage of collagen fibrils in corneal stroma and a loss of their regular arrangement. Corneal tissue stored in glycerol showed collagen fibril aggregates and empty spaces between fibrils caused by dehydration. Cryopreserved tissue without previous gamma irradiation showed the most regular structure of the fibrils comparable to storage in hypothermia. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that formation of a corneal lenticule lamellae by microkeratome results in smoother corneal lenticules, while being much cheaper than formation by femtosecond laser. Gamma irradiation of 25 kGy caused damage of the collagen fibres as well as their network arrangement, which correlated with loss of transparency and stiffer structure. These changes impair possible surgical utilisation of gamma irradiated corneas. Storage in glycerol at room temperature and cryopreservation had similar outcomes and we believe that both methods are appropriate and safe for further clinical use .
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23017046
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240716090045.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12886-023-03048-3 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37386384
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Poláchová, Martina $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic. martina.polachova@fnkv.cz $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Ruska 87, 10000, Prague 10, Czech Republic. martina.polachova@fnkv.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000238997956 $7 xx0319575
- 245 14
- $a The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation - methods of preparation and preservation / $c M. Polachova, M. Netukova, O. Benada, T. Kucera, V. Kolin, AD. Baxant, Z. Sirolova, P. Studeny
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The goal of our study is to find an optimal approach to the preparation and preservation of corneal stromal tissue. We want to compare different methods of corneal stromal tissue creation and storage to optimize the efficacy of this process under the conditions of an eye bank. After we find the most suitable method to create a safe high quality product, we want to prove the possibility of using a single donor cornea for more than one patient. We would also like to verify the feasibility of making more corneal lenticules after the removal of a corneal endothelium for DMEK transplantation. METHODS: We provided morphological (histology, scanning electron microscope) and microbiological analysis in order to compare different methods of corneal lenticule and corneal stromal lamellae preparation and preservation. We also tested the surgical handling of the tissue to secure a safe manipulation of the tissue for clinical use. We compared two methods of corneal lenticule preparation: microkeratome dissection and femtosecond laser. As methods of preservation, we tested hypothermia, cryopreservation at -80 degrees Celsius in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and storage at room temperature with glycerol. Some intrastromal lenticules and lamellae in each group were previously irradiated with gamma radiation of 25 kGy (KiloGray). RESULTS: Corneal stromal lamellae prepared with a microkeratome have a smoother cut - side surface compared to lamellae prepared with a femtosecond laser. Femtosecond laser preparation caused more irregularities on the surface and we detected more conglomerates of the fibrils, while lamellae made with microkeratome had more sparse network. Using femtosecond laser, we were able to make more than five lenticules from a single donor cornea. Gamma irradiation led to damage of collagen fibrils in corneal stroma and a loss of their regular arrangement. Corneal tissue stored in glycerol showed collagen fibril aggregates and empty spaces between fibrils caused by dehydration. Cryopreserved tissue without previous gamma irradiation showed the most regular structure of the fibrils comparable to storage in hypothermia. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that formation of a corneal lenticule lamellae by microkeratome results in smoother corneal lenticules, while being much cheaper than formation by femtosecond laser. Gamma irradiation of 25 kGy caused damage of the collagen fibres as well as their network arrangement, which correlated with loss of transparency and stiffer structure. These changes impair possible surgical utilisation of gamma irradiated corneas. Storage in glycerol at room temperature and cryopreservation had similar outcomes and we believe that both methods are appropriate and safe for further clinical use .
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a glycerol $7 D005990
- 650 12
- $a hypotermie $7 D007035
- 650 _2
- $a rohovka $x chirurgie $7 D003315
- 650 _2
- $a stroma rohovky $x chirurgie $7 D003319
- 650 _2
- $a dimethylsulfoxid $7 D004121
- 650 _2
- $a kolagen $7 D003094
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Netukova, Magdalena $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic $u International Eye Bank of Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Benada, Oldrich $u Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences. Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4 - Krč, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kucera, Tomas $u Institute of Histology and Embryology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 4, Prague 10, 128 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kolin, Vojtech $u Department of Pathology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Baxant, Alina-Dana $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sirolova, Zuzana $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Studeny, Pavel $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008199 $t BMC ophthalmology $x 1471-2415 $g Roč. 23, č. 1 (2023), s. 294
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37386384 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240716090042 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2000527 $s 1203408
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 23 $c 1 $d 294 $e 20230629 $i 1471-2415 $m BMC ophthalmology $n BMC Ophthalmol $x MED00008199
- GRA __
- $a 350321 $p Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
- GRA __
- $a 350321 $p Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231013