• Something wrong with this record ?

The potential of biomarkers for diagnosing insomnia: Consensus statement of the WFSBP Task Force on Sleep Disorders

D. Dikeos, A. Wichniak, PY. Ktonas, T. Mikoteit, T. Crönlein, A. Eckert, J. Kopřivová, M. Ntafouli, K. Spiegelhalder, M. Hatzinger, D. Riemann, C. Soldatos

. 2023 ; 24 (8) : 614-642. [pub] 20230307

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Review

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24001193

OBJECTIVES: Thus far, the diagnosis of insomnia is based on purely clinical criteria. Although a broad range of altered physiological parameters has been identified in insomniacs, the evidence to establish their diagnostic usefulness is very limited. Purpose of this WFSBP Task Force consensus paper is to systematically evaluate a series of biomarkers as potential diagnostic tools for insomnia. METHODS: A newly created grading system was used for assessing the validity of various measurements in establishing the diagnosis of insomnia; these measurements originated from relevant studies selected and reviewed by experts. RESULTS: The measurements with the highest diagnostic performance were those derived from psychometric instruments. Biological measurements which emerged as potentially useful diagnostic instruments were polysomnography-derived cyclic alternating pattern, actigraphy, and BDNF levels, followed by heart rate around sleep onset, deficient melatonin rhythm, and certain neuroimaging patterns (mainly for the activity of frontal and pre-frontal cortex, hippocampus and basal ganglia); yet, these findings need replication, as well as establishment of commonly accepted methodology and diagnostic cut-off points. Routine polysomnography, EEG spectral analysis, heart rate variability, skin conductance, thermoregulation, oxygen consumption, HPA axis, and inflammation indices were not shown to be of satisfactory diagnostic value. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from psychometric instruments which are confirmed to be the gold standard in diagnosing insomnia, six biomarkers emerge as being potentially useful for this purpose.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24001193
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240213094427.0
007      
ta
008      
240109s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/15622975.2023.2171479 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36880792
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Dikeos, Dimitris $u First Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece $1 https://orcid.org/0000000342175282
245    14
$a The potential of biomarkers for diagnosing insomnia: Consensus statement of the WFSBP Task Force on Sleep Disorders / $c D. Dikeos, A. Wichniak, PY. Ktonas, T. Mikoteit, T. Crönlein, A. Eckert, J. Kopřivová, M. Ntafouli, K. Spiegelhalder, M. Hatzinger, D. Riemann, C. Soldatos
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: Thus far, the diagnosis of insomnia is based on purely clinical criteria. Although a broad range of altered physiological parameters has been identified in insomniacs, the evidence to establish their diagnostic usefulness is very limited. Purpose of this WFSBP Task Force consensus paper is to systematically evaluate a series of biomarkers as potential diagnostic tools for insomnia. METHODS: A newly created grading system was used for assessing the validity of various measurements in establishing the diagnosis of insomnia; these measurements originated from relevant studies selected and reviewed by experts. RESULTS: The measurements with the highest diagnostic performance were those derived from psychometric instruments. Biological measurements which emerged as potentially useful diagnostic instruments were polysomnography-derived cyclic alternating pattern, actigraphy, and BDNF levels, followed by heart rate around sleep onset, deficient melatonin rhythm, and certain neuroimaging patterns (mainly for the activity of frontal and pre-frontal cortex, hippocampus and basal ganglia); yet, these findings need replication, as well as establishment of commonly accepted methodology and diagnostic cut-off points. Routine polysomnography, EEG spectral analysis, heart rate variability, skin conductance, thermoregulation, oxygen consumption, HPA axis, and inflammation indices were not shown to be of satisfactory diagnostic value. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from psychometric instruments which are confirmed to be the gold standard in diagnosing insomnia, six biomarkers emerge as being potentially useful for this purpose.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a poruchy iniciace a udržování spánku $x diagnóza $7 D007319
650    _2
$a systém hypotalamus-hypofýza $7 D007030
650    _2
$a systém hypofýza - nadledviny $7 D010913
650    _2
$a spánek $x fyziologie $7 D012890
650    _2
$a biologické markery $7 D015415
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Wichniak, Adam $u Third Department of Psychiatry, Sleep Medicine Center, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/000000025352601X
700    1_
$a Ktonas, Periklis Y $u First Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece $u Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
700    1_
$a Mikoteit, Thorsten $u Psychiatric Services Solothurn, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Solothurn, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000321666330
700    1_
$a Crönlein, Tatjana $u Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000335057595
700    1_
$a Eckert, Anne $u Neurobiology Lab for Brain Aging and Mental Health, Transfaculty Research Platform Molecular & Cognitive Neuroscience (MCN), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000293413669
700    1_
$a Kopřivová, Jana $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000236265372 $7 xx0105368
700    1_
$a Ntafouli, Maria $u First Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece $1 https://orcid.org/0000000260742124
700    1_
$a Spiegelhalder, Kai $u Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000241333464
700    1_
$a Hatzinger, Martin $u Psychiatric Services Solothurn, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Solothurn, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000261463602
700    1_
$a Riemann, Dieter $u Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000219686220 $7 nlk20030145803
700    1_
$a Soldatos, Constantin $u First Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277918712
773    0_
$w MED00176986 $t The world journal of biological psychiatry $x 1814-1412 $g Roč. 24, č. 8 (2023), s. 614-642
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36880792 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240213094424 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2049665 $s 1210887
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 24 $c 8 $d 614-642 $e 20230307 $i 1814-1412 $m The world journal of biological psychiatry $n World J Biol Psychiatry $x MED00176986
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240109

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options