• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior versus Anterior Circulation Stroke: Clinical Outcome Differs Only in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion

S. Halúsková, R. Herzig, R. Mikulík, S. Bělašková, M. Reiser, L. Jurák, D. Václavík, M. Bar, L. Klečka, T. Řepík, V. Šigut, A. Tomek, D. Hlinovský, D. Šaňák, O. Vyšata, M. Vališ, . On Behalf Of The Czech Sits Investigators

. 2024 ; 12 (2) : . [pub] 20240209

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24005819

Grantová podpora
Cooperatio Program, research area NEUR Charles University
DRO - UHHK 00179906 Ministry of Health
IRIS-TEPUS Project No. LTC20051 (INTER-EXCELLENCE INTER-COST Program) Ministry of Education Youth and Sports
No. CA18118 (IRENE COST Action) COST Association
STROCZECH within CZECRIN Large Research Infrastructure (No. LM2023049) Czech Republic

The safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) are well established in anterior circulation stroke (ACS) but are much less clear for posterior circulation stroke (PCS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of parenchymal hematoma (PH) and 3-month clinical outcomes after IVT in PCS and ACS. In an observational, cohort multicenter study, we analyzed data from ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT prospectively collected in the SITS (Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke) registry in the Czech Republic between 2004 and 2018. Out of 10,211 patients, 1166 (11.4%) had PCS, and 9045 (88.6%) ACS. PH was less frequent in PCS versus ACS patients: 3.6 vs. 5.9%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.594 in the whole set, 4.4 vs. 7.8%, OR = 0.543 in those with large vessel occlusion (LVO), and 2.2 vs. 4.7%, OR = 0.463 in those without LVO. At 3 months, PCS patients compared with ACS patients achieved more frequently excellent clinical outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-1: 55.5 vs. 47.6%, OR = 1.371 in the whole set and 49.2 vs. 37.6%, OR = 1.307 in those with LVO), good clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2: 69.9 vs. 62.8%, OR = 1.377 in the whole set and 64.5 vs. 50.5%, OR = 1.279 in those with LVO), and had lower mortality (12.4 vs. 16.6%, OR = 0.716 in the whole set and 18.4 vs. 25.5%, OR = 0.723 in those with LVO) (p < 0.05 in all cases). In PCS versus ACS patients, an extensive analysis showed a lower risk of PH both in patients with and without LVO, more frequent excellent and good clinical outcomes, and lower mortality 3 months after IVT in patients with LVO.

Department of Clinical Neurosciences Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava 708 00 Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Comprehensive Stroke Center Charles University 2nd Faculty of Medicine Motol University Hospital 150 06 Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Comprehensive Stroke Center Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc 779 00 Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Comprehensive Stroke Center Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava and University Hospital Ostrava 708 52 Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Comprehensive Stroke Center Hospital České Budějovice 370 01 České Budějovice Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Comprehensive Stroke Center University Hospital Hradec Králové 500 05 Hradec Králové Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Comprehensive Stroke Center University Hospital in Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University 323 00 Pilsen Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Faculty of Health Studies Pardubice University and Pardubice Hospital 532 10 Pardubice Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové Charles University 500 03 Hradec Králové Czech Republic

International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital in Brno 602 00 Brno Czech Republic

Neurocenter Regional Hospital Liberec 460 63 Liberec Czech Republic

Research and Training Institute Agel Stroke Center Department of Neurology Hospital Ostrava Vítkovice 703 00 Ostrava Czech Republic

Research Institute for Biomedical Science 500 02 Hradec Králové Czech Republic

Stroke Center Department of Neurology City Hospital Ostrava 703 00 Ostrava Czech Republic

Stroke Center Department of Neurology Krnov Hospital 794 01 Krnov Czech Republic

Stroke Center Department of Neurology Thomayer University Hospital 140 59 Prague Czech Republic

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24005819
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240412131017.0
007      
ta
008      
240405s2024 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/biomedicines12020404 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38398006
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Halúsková, Simona $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health Studies, Pardubice University and Pardubice Hospital, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Intravenous Thrombolysis in Posterior versus Anterior Circulation Stroke: Clinical Outcome Differs Only in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion / $c S. Halúsková, R. Herzig, R. Mikulík, S. Bělašková, M. Reiser, L. Jurák, D. Václavík, M. Bar, L. Klečka, T. Řepík, V. Šigut, A. Tomek, D. Hlinovský, D. Šaňák, O. Vyšata, M. Vališ, . On Behalf Of The Czech Sits Investigators
520    9_
$a The safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) are well established in anterior circulation stroke (ACS) but are much less clear for posterior circulation stroke (PCS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of parenchymal hematoma (PH) and 3-month clinical outcomes after IVT in PCS and ACS. In an observational, cohort multicenter study, we analyzed data from ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT prospectively collected in the SITS (Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke) registry in the Czech Republic between 2004 and 2018. Out of 10,211 patients, 1166 (11.4%) had PCS, and 9045 (88.6%) ACS. PH was less frequent in PCS versus ACS patients: 3.6 vs. 5.9%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.594 in the whole set, 4.4 vs. 7.8%, OR = 0.543 in those with large vessel occlusion (LVO), and 2.2 vs. 4.7%, OR = 0.463 in those without LVO. At 3 months, PCS patients compared with ACS patients achieved more frequently excellent clinical outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-1: 55.5 vs. 47.6%, OR = 1.371 in the whole set and 49.2 vs. 37.6%, OR = 1.307 in those with LVO), good clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2: 69.9 vs. 62.8%, OR = 1.377 in the whole set and 64.5 vs. 50.5%, OR = 1.279 in those with LVO), and had lower mortality (12.4 vs. 16.6%, OR = 0.716 in the whole set and 18.4 vs. 25.5%, OR = 0.723 in those with LVO) (p < 0.05 in all cases). In PCS versus ACS patients, an extensive analysis showed a lower risk of PH both in patients with and without LVO, more frequent excellent and good clinical outcomes, and lower mortality 3 months after IVT in patients with LVO.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Herzig, Roman $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Hradec Králové, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Research Institute for Biomedical Science, 500 02 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000172387724 $7 mzk2007411122
700    1_
$a Mikulík, Robert $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bělašková, Silvie $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Reiser, Martin $u Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Hospital České Budějovice, 370 01 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jurák, Lubomír $u Neurocenter, Regional Hospital Liberec, 460 63 Liberec, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000220962798 $7 xx0267976
700    1_
$a Václavík, Daniel $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Hradec Králové, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Research and Training Institute Agel, Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital Ostrava Vítkovice, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bar, Michal $u Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava and University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000250495844 $7 xx0047124
700    1_
$a Klečka, Lukáš $u Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, City Hospital Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000213165782
700    1_
$a Řepík, Tomáš $u Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital in Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 323 00 Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šigut, Vladimír $u Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Krnov Hospital, 794 01 Krnov, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tomek, Aleš $u Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Charles University 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hlinovský, David $u Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Thomayer University Hospital, 140 59 Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000667198674
700    1_
$a Šaňák, Daniel $u Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vyšata, Oldřich $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, University Hospital Hradec Králové, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vališ, Martin $u Research Institute for Biomedical Science, 500 02 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a On Behalf Of The Czech Sits Investigators,
773    0_
$w MED00205373 $t Biomedicines $x 2227-9059 $g Roč. 12, č. 2 (2024)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38398006 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240412131009 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2076038 $s 1215581
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 12 $c 2 $e 20240209 $i 2227-9059 $m Biomedicines $n Biomedicines $x MED00205373
GRA    __
$a Cooperatio Program, research area NEUR $p Charles University
GRA    __
$a DRO - UHHK 00179906 $p Ministry of Health
GRA    __
$a IRIS-TEPUS Project No. LTC20051 (INTER-EXCELLENCE INTER-COST Program) $p Ministry of Education Youth and Sports
GRA    __
$a No. CA18118 (IRENE COST Action) $p COST Association
GRA    __
$a STROCZECH within CZECRIN Large Research Infrastructure (No. LM2023049) $p Czech Republic
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240405

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...