Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging (OSIPI): Results from the OSIPI-Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced challenge

ES. Shalom, H. Kim, RA. van der Heijden, Z. Ahmed, R. Patel, DA. Hormuth, JC. DiCarlo, TE. Yankeelov, NJ. Sisco, RD. Dortch, AM. Stokes, M. Inglese, M. Grech-Sollars, N. Toschi, P. Sahoo, A. Singh, SK. Verma, DK. Rathore, AS. Kazerouni, SC....

. 2024 ; 91 (5) : 1803-1821. [pub] 20231219

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24006503

Grantová podpora
2282622 EPSRC-CASE
Bracco Diagnostics

PURPOSE: Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ has often been proposed as a quantitative imaging biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response assessment for various tumors. None of the many software tools for Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ quantification are standardized. The ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging-Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (OSIPI-DCE) challenge was designed to benchmark methods to better help the efforts to standardize Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ measurement. METHODS: A framework was created to evaluate Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ values produced by DCE-MRI analysis pipelines to enable benchmarking. The perfusion MRI community was invited to apply their pipelines for Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ quantification in glioblastoma from clinical and synthetic patients. Submissions were required to include the entrants' Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ values, the applied software, and a standard operating procedure. These were evaluated using the proposed OSIPIgold$$ \mathrm{OSIP}{\mathrm{I}}_{\mathrm{gold}} $$ score defined with accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility components. RESULTS: Across the 10 received submissions, the OSIPIgold$$ \mathrm{OSIP}{\mathrm{I}}_{\mathrm{gold}} $$ score ranged from 28% to 78% with a 59% median. The accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility scores ranged from 0.54 to 0.92, 0.64 to 0.86, and 0.65 to 1.00, respectively (0-1 = lowest-highest). Manual arterial input function selection markedly affected the reproducibility and showed greater variability in Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ analysis than automated methods. Furthermore, provision of a detailed standard operating procedure was critical for higher reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports results from the OSIPI-DCE challenge and highlights the high inter-software variability within Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ estimation, providing a framework for ongoing benchmarking against the scores presented. Through this challenge, the participating teams were ranked based on the performance of their software tools in the particular setting of this challenge. In a real-world clinical setting, many of these tools may perform differently with different benchmarking methodology.

Advanced Imaging Research Center Oregon Health and Science Institute Portland Oregon USA

Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

Biomedical Imaging Center Livestrong Cancer Institutes University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA

Bioxydyn Ltd Manchester UK

Cancer Center Amsterdam Imaging and Biomarkers Amsterdam The Netherlands

Center for Biomedical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Delhi New Delhi India

Center for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine School of Computing School of Medicine University of Leeds Leeds UK

Center for Data Driven Discovery Division of Neurosurgery Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Center for Medical Image Computing Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering University College London London UK

Clinical Imaging Group Genentech Inc South San Francisco California USA

Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital Royal Oak Michigan USA

Czech Academy of Sciences Institute of Information Theory and Automation Praha Czech Republic

Czech Academy of Sciences Institute of Scientific Instruments Brno Czech Republic

Department of Biomedicine and Prevention University of Rome Tor Vergata Italy

Department of Computer Science University College London London UK

Department of Diagnostic Medicine University of Texas Austin Texas USA

Department of Imaging Physics MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

Department of Infection Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

Department of Neurosurgery Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania USA

Department of Radiological Sciences University of California Los Angeles California USA

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Radiology Grossman School of Medicine New York University New York New York USA

Department of Radiology Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

Department of Radiology Neuroradiology Division Mayo Clinic Scottsdale Arizona USA

Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Department of Radiology The Christie Hospital NHS Trust Manchester UK

Department of Radiology University of Alabama Birmingham Alabama USA

Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

Department of Radiology University of Wisconsin Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

Department of Radiology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA

Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London UK

Department of Translational Neuroscience Barrow Neurological Institute Phoenix Arizona USA

Departments of Biomedical Engineering Diagnostic Medicine Oncology Livestrong Cancer Institutes Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences The University of Texas Austin Texas USA

Division of Cancer Sciences University of Manchester Manchester UK

Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging The Institute of Cancer Research London UK

Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS Bremen Germany

Institute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging Singapore Singapore

Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London UK

Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK

Neuroradiology Division Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA

Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences The University of Texas Austin Texas USA

Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

School of Physics and Astronomy University of Leeds Leeds UK

University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24006503
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240423155325.0
007      
ta
008      
240412s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/mrm.29909 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38115695
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Shalom, Eve S $u School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK $u Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000187623726
245    14
$a The ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging (OSIPI): Results from the OSIPI-Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced challenge / $c ES. Shalom, H. Kim, RA. van der Heijden, Z. Ahmed, R. Patel, DA. Hormuth, JC. DiCarlo, TE. Yankeelov, NJ. Sisco, RD. Dortch, AM. Stokes, M. Inglese, M. Grech-Sollars, N. Toschi, P. Sahoo, A. Singh, SK. Verma, DK. Rathore, AS. Kazerouni, SC. Partridge, E. LoCastro, R. Paudyal, IA. Wolansky, A. Shukla-Dave, P. Schouten, OJ. Gurney-Champion, R. Jiřík, O. Macíček, M. Bartoš, J. Vitouš, AB. Das, SG. Kim, L. Bokacheva, A. Mikheev, H. Rusinek, M. Berks, PL. Hubbard Cristinacce, RA. Little, S. Cheung, JPB. O'Connor, GJM. Parker, B. Moloney, PS. LaViolette, S. Bobholz, S. Duenweg, J. Virostko, HO. Laue, K. Sung, A. Nabavizadeh, H. Saligheh Rad, LS. Hu, S. Sourbron, LC. Bell, A. Fathi Kazerooni
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ has often been proposed as a quantitative imaging biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response assessment for various tumors. None of the many software tools for Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ quantification are standardized. The ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging-Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (OSIPI-DCE) challenge was designed to benchmark methods to better help the efforts to standardize Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ measurement. METHODS: A framework was created to evaluate Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ values produced by DCE-MRI analysis pipelines to enable benchmarking. The perfusion MRI community was invited to apply their pipelines for Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ quantification in glioblastoma from clinical and synthetic patients. Submissions were required to include the entrants' Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ values, the applied software, and a standard operating procedure. These were evaluated using the proposed OSIPIgold$$ \mathrm{OSIP}{\mathrm{I}}_{\mathrm{gold}} $$ score defined with accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility components. RESULTS: Across the 10 received submissions, the OSIPIgold$$ \mathrm{OSIP}{\mathrm{I}}_{\mathrm{gold}} $$ score ranged from 28% to 78% with a 59% median. The accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility scores ranged from 0.54 to 0.92, 0.64 to 0.86, and 0.65 to 1.00, respectively (0-1 = lowest-highest). Manual arterial input function selection markedly affected the reproducibility and showed greater variability in Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ analysis than automated methods. Furthermore, provision of a detailed standard operating procedure was critical for higher reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports results from the OSIPI-DCE challenge and highlights the high inter-software variability within Ktrans$$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ estimation, providing a framework for ongoing benchmarking against the scores presented. Through this challenge, the participating teams were ranked based on the performance of their software tools in the particular setting of this challenge. In a real-world clinical setting, many of these tools may perform differently with different benchmarking methodology.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a kontrastní látky $7 D003287
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a software $7 D012984
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kim, Harrison $u Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
700    1_
$a van der Heijden, Rianne A $u Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands $u Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000169642536
700    1_
$a Ahmed, Zaki $u Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000156480590
700    1_
$a Patel, Reyna $u Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
700    1_
$a Hormuth, David A $u Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000296431694
700    1_
$a DiCarlo, Julie C $u Biomedical Imaging Center, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000269653611
700    1_
$a Yankeelov, Thomas E $u Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Diagnostic Medicine, Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA $u Department of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000270220565
700    1_
$a Sisco, Nicholas J $u Department of Translational Neuroscience, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
700    1_
$a Dortch, Richard D $u Department of Translational Neuroscience, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000299782203
700    1_
$a Stokes, Ashley M $u Department of Translational Neuroscience, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
700    1_
$a Inglese, Marianna $u Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Italy $u Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
700    1_
$a Grech-Sollars, Matthew $u Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK $u Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK $u Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000338814870
700    1_
$a Toschi, Nicola $u Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Italy $u Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
700    1_
$a Sahoo, Prativa $u University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
700    1_
$a Singh, Anup $u Center for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
700    1_
$a Verma, Sanjay K $u Institute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging, Singapore, Singapore
700    1_
$a Rathore, Divya K $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK
700    1_
$a Kazerouni, Anum S $u Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA $1 https://orcid.org/000000024200534X
700    1_
$a Partridge, Savannah C $u Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000163709111
700    1_
$a LoCastro, Eve $u Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000339758153
700    1_
$a Paudyal, Ramesh $u Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Wolansky, Ivan A $u Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000221093942
700    1_
$a Shukla-Dave, Amita $u Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA $u Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Schouten, Pepijn $u Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Gurney-Champion, Oliver J $u Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands $u Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Jiřík, Radovan $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000325559428
700    1_
$a Macíček, Ondřej $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000201795779
700    1_
$a Bartoš, Michal $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Praha, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000343897703
700    1_
$a Vitouš, Jiří $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000291838794
700    1_
$a Das, Ayesha Bharadwaj $u Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000157828894
700    1_
$a Kim, S Gene $u Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000262880678
700    1_
$a Bokacheva, Louisa $u Department of Radiology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Mikheev, Artem $u Department of Radiology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
700    1_
$a Rusinek, Henry $u Department of Radiology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000160356314
700    1_
$a Berks, Michael $u Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000347272006
700    1_
$a Hubbard Cristinacce, Penny L $u Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000342133234
700    1_
$a Little, Ross A $u Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
700    1_
$a Cheung, Susan $u Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
700    1_
$a O'Connor, James P B $u Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK $u Department of Radiology, The Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK $u Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000240448497
700    1_
$a Parker, Geoff J M $u Center for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK $u Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000329342234
700    1_
$a Moloney, Brendan $u Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
700    1_
$a LaViolette, Peter S $u Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000296026891
700    1_
$a Bobholz, Samuel $u Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000315257418
700    1_
$a Duenweg, Savannah $u Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000340107737
700    1_
$a Virostko, John $u Department of Diagnostic Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000334138801
700    1_
$a Laue, Hendrik O $u Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany
700    1_
$a Sung, Kyunghyun $u Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000341755322
700    1_
$a Nabavizadeh, Ali $u Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA $u Center for Data-Driven Discovery, Division of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
700    1_
$a Saligheh Rad, Hamidreza $u Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran $u Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, School of Computing/School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000190652149
700    1_
$a Hu, Leland S $u Neuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
700    1_
$a Sourbron, Steven $u Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK $1 https://orcid.org/0000000233743973 $7 xx0278671
700    1_
$a Bell, Laura C $u Clinical Imaging Group, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000181648324
700    1_
$a Fathi Kazerooni, Anahita $u Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran $u Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000171312261
773    0_
$w MED00003172 $t Magnetic resonance in medicine $x 1522-2594 $g Roč. 91, č. 5 (2024), s. 1803-1821
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38115695 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240412 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240423155321 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2080851 $s 1216270
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 91 $c 5 $d 1803-1821 $e 20231219 $i 1522-2594 $m Magnetic resonance in medicine $n Magn Reson Med $x MED00003172
GRA    __
$a 2282622 $p EPSRC-CASE
GRA    __
$p Bracco Diagnostics
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240412

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...