-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
History of proximal femur fractures in the German literature
J. Bartoníček, S. Rammelt, O. Naňka
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
Grantová podpora
MO1012
IP DZRVO
Cooperatio - Morphological Disciplines of Medicine.
Charles University Cooperatio Project
- MeSH
- femur chirurgie MeSH
- fraktury krčku femuru * chirurgie MeSH
- fraktury kyčle * chirurgie MeSH
- fraktury proximálního femuru * MeSH
- kostní hřeby MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- vnitřní fixace fraktury MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
INTRODUCTION: German-speaking surgeons have left a deep imprint on the history of diagnostics and treatment of proximal femur fractures. Some of the studies published in German have fell into oblivion, others are cited until today, although sometimes quite inaccurately. The cause of such inaccuracies are citations from secondary sources due to unavailability of the original or inability to read it because of a language barrier. In the current literature, globally predominated by English articles, the "German history" of treatment of proximal femur fractures remains undervalued. The aim of the present article is to point out its contribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. RESULTS: The German-speaking surgeons have considerably contributed to the development of the treatment of proximal femur fractures. The analyzed period between 1847 and 1970 may be divided into three basic periods. In the first period (1847-1896), the German-speaking surgeons (Langenbeck, Trendelenburg, König, Heine, Dolinger) were the first worldwide to start treating the fractures of proximal femur operatively. In the second period (1897-1935), mainly in the 1930s, the initiative in Europe was taken over by surgeons publishing studies in France and in Belgium. Overseas, American surgeons were coming to the forefront. In Germany, only Pauwels developed the first biomechanical classification of femoral neck fractures. In the third period (1936-1970), mainly in the 1940s and 1950s, implants were designed (Pohl, Künstcher), based on close collaboration between German engineers and surgeons, that served as a model for a dynamic hip screw and a proximal femoral nail, which are currently the implants of choice in the treatment of trochanteric fractures. CONCLUSION: The historical contribution of German-speaking surgeons to understanding the issue of proximal femur fractures and their operative treatment is far more significant than presented in the historical studies published in English.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24006621
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423155414.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00264-023-06039-7 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37980285
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Bartoníček, Jan $u Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and the Central Military Hospital, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000222281443 $7 nlk19990073000
- 245 10
- $a History of proximal femur fractures in the German literature / $c J. Bartoníček, S. Rammelt, O. Naňka
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: German-speaking surgeons have left a deep imprint on the history of diagnostics and treatment of proximal femur fractures. Some of the studies published in German have fell into oblivion, others are cited until today, although sometimes quite inaccurately. The cause of such inaccuracies are citations from secondary sources due to unavailability of the original or inability to read it because of a language barrier. In the current literature, globally predominated by English articles, the "German history" of treatment of proximal femur fractures remains undervalued. The aim of the present article is to point out its contribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. RESULTS: The German-speaking surgeons have considerably contributed to the development of the treatment of proximal femur fractures. The analyzed period between 1847 and 1970 may be divided into three basic periods. In the first period (1847-1896), the German-speaking surgeons (Langenbeck, Trendelenburg, König, Heine, Dolinger) were the first worldwide to start treating the fractures of proximal femur operatively. In the second period (1897-1935), mainly in the 1930s, the initiative in Europe was taken over by surgeons publishing studies in France and in Belgium. Overseas, American surgeons were coming to the forefront. In Germany, only Pauwels developed the first biomechanical classification of femoral neck fractures. In the third period (1936-1970), mainly in the 1940s and 1950s, implants were designed (Pohl, Künstcher), based on close collaboration between German engineers and surgeons, that served as a model for a dynamic hip screw and a proximal femoral nail, which are currently the implants of choice in the treatment of trochanteric fractures. CONCLUSION: The historical contribution of German-speaking surgeons to understanding the issue of proximal femur fractures and their operative treatment is far more significant than presented in the historical studies published in English.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $7 D005593
- 650 12
- $a fraktury proximálního femuru $7 D000092526
- 650 12
- $a fraktury kyčle $x chirurgie $7 D006620
- 650 12
- $a fraktury krčku femuru $x chirurgie $7 D005265
- 650 _2
- $a femur $x chirurgie $7 D005269
- 650 _2
- $a kostní hřeby $7 D001858
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Rammelt, Stefan $u University Center of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, E01307, Dresden, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000311416493
- 700 1_
- $a Naňka, Ondřej $u Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic. Ondrej.Nanka@lf1.cuni.cz $1 https://orcid.org/000000026300395X $7 mzk2006348905
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002384 $t International orthopaedics $x 1432-5195 $g Roč. 48, č. 4 (2024), s. 1113-1121
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37980285 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423155410 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2080933 $s 1216388
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 48 $c 4 $d 1113-1121 $e 20231118 $i 1432-5195 $m International orthopaedics $n Int Orthop $x MED00002384
- GRA __
- $a MO1012 $p IP DZRVO
- GRA __
- $a Cooperatio - Morphological Disciplines of Medicine. $p Charles University Cooperatio Project
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412