• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study

S. Odlozilova, J. Paral, I. Slaninka, J. Zajak, M. Lesko, T. Geryk, L. Gerykova, M. Sirovy

. 2024 ; 14 (2) : 38-47. [pub] 20240415

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24013004

OBJECTIVE: In this experimental study, we aimed to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a suitable preservative for dermo-epidermal grafts. An additional objective was to investigate how long grafts can be stored without biological degradation. METHODS: We compared pig skin graft preservation using PRP versus saline solution and crystalloid Custodiol®, which is used for hypothermic preservation of organs for transplantation. Grafts (10 × 10 mm) were placed on gauze impregnated with one of the tested solutions, and stored for 3, 7, 11, and 15 days at a constant temperature of 4°C. We evaluated a total of 240 pig skin samples: 120 by histopathology and 120 by fluorescence optical microscopy. RESULTS: Overall, Custodiol® solution appeared to be the best medium for preservation of dermo-epidermal grafts, with beneficial properties manifested on days 7 and 11. Although we expected PRP to be a better preservative than saline, this was not confirmed by our results, as we found no significant difference between these two media. In fact, by day 3, the histopathological results were better with standard saline solution than with PRP. On day 15, with each tested solution, some samples showed histological changes that are incompatible with graft viability. CONCLUSION: Overall, Custodiol® appears to be the best medium for dermo-epidermal graft preservation. Moreover, the present findings suggest a maximum graft storage time of 11 days in all of the tested solutions. We do not recommend using grafts stored for 15 days, due to isolated signs of graft biodegradation with all solutions.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24013004
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240726151500.0
007      
ta
008      
240723s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.62347/MLIW4300 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38764893
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Odlozilova, Sarka $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study / $c S. Odlozilova, J. Paral, I. Slaninka, J. Zajak, M. Lesko, T. Geryk, L. Gerykova, M. Sirovy
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: In this experimental study, we aimed to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a suitable preservative for dermo-epidermal grafts. An additional objective was to investigate how long grafts can be stored without biological degradation. METHODS: We compared pig skin graft preservation using PRP versus saline solution and crystalloid Custodiol®, which is used for hypothermic preservation of organs for transplantation. Grafts (10 × 10 mm) were placed on gauze impregnated with one of the tested solutions, and stored for 3, 7, 11, and 15 days at a constant temperature of 4°C. We evaluated a total of 240 pig skin samples: 120 by histopathology and 120 by fluorescence optical microscopy. RESULTS: Overall, Custodiol® solution appeared to be the best medium for preservation of dermo-epidermal grafts, with beneficial properties manifested on days 7 and 11. Although we expected PRP to be a better preservative than saline, this was not confirmed by our results, as we found no significant difference between these two media. In fact, by day 3, the histopathological results were better with standard saline solution than with PRP. On day 15, with each tested solution, some samples showed histological changes that are incompatible with graft viability. CONCLUSION: Overall, Custodiol® appears to be the best medium for dermo-epidermal graft preservation. Moreover, the present findings suggest a maximum graft storage time of 11 days in all of the tested solutions. We do not recommend using grafts stored for 15 days, due to isolated signs of graft biodegradation with all solutions.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Paral, Jiri $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Slaninka, Igor $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zajak, Jan $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lesko, Michal $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Geryk, Tomas $u The Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gerykova, Lucie $u The Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sirovy, Miroslav $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00215022 $t International journal of burns and trauma $x 2160-2026 $g Roč. 14, č. 2 (2024), s. 38-47
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38764893 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240723 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240726151453 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2125557 $s 1224867
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 14 $c 2 $d 38-47 $e 20240415 $i 2160-2026 $m International journal of burns and trauma $n Int. j. burns trauma $x MED00215022
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240723

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...