-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study
S. Odlozilova, J. Paral, I. Slaninka, J. Zajak, M. Lesko, T. Geryk, L. Gerykova, M. Sirovy
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
PubMed
38764893
DOI
10.62347/mliw4300
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: In this experimental study, we aimed to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a suitable preservative for dermo-epidermal grafts. An additional objective was to investigate how long grafts can be stored without biological degradation. METHODS: We compared pig skin graft preservation using PRP versus saline solution and crystalloid Custodiol®, which is used for hypothermic preservation of organs for transplantation. Grafts (10 × 10 mm) were placed on gauze impregnated with one of the tested solutions, and stored for 3, 7, 11, and 15 days at a constant temperature of 4°C. We evaluated a total of 240 pig skin samples: 120 by histopathology and 120 by fluorescence optical microscopy. RESULTS: Overall, Custodiol® solution appeared to be the best medium for preservation of dermo-epidermal grafts, with beneficial properties manifested on days 7 and 11. Although we expected PRP to be a better preservative than saline, this was not confirmed by our results, as we found no significant difference between these two media. In fact, by day 3, the histopathological results were better with standard saline solution than with PRP. On day 15, with each tested solution, some samples showed histological changes that are incompatible with graft viability. CONCLUSION: Overall, Custodiol® appears to be the best medium for dermo-epidermal graft preservation. Moreover, the present findings suggest a maximum graft storage time of 11 days in all of the tested solutions. We do not recommend using grafts stored for 15 days, due to isolated signs of graft biodegradation with all solutions.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013004
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240726151500.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240723s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.62347/MLIW4300 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38764893
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Odlozilova, Sarka $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma for skin graft preservation: an experimental comparative study / $c S. Odlozilova, J. Paral, I. Slaninka, J. Zajak, M. Lesko, T. Geryk, L. Gerykova, M. Sirovy
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: In this experimental study, we aimed to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a suitable preservative for dermo-epidermal grafts. An additional objective was to investigate how long grafts can be stored without biological degradation. METHODS: We compared pig skin graft preservation using PRP versus saline solution and crystalloid Custodiol®, which is used for hypothermic preservation of organs for transplantation. Grafts (10 × 10 mm) were placed on gauze impregnated with one of the tested solutions, and stored for 3, 7, 11, and 15 days at a constant temperature of 4°C. We evaluated a total of 240 pig skin samples: 120 by histopathology and 120 by fluorescence optical microscopy. RESULTS: Overall, Custodiol® solution appeared to be the best medium for preservation of dermo-epidermal grafts, with beneficial properties manifested on days 7 and 11. Although we expected PRP to be a better preservative than saline, this was not confirmed by our results, as we found no significant difference between these two media. In fact, by day 3, the histopathological results were better with standard saline solution than with PRP. On day 15, with each tested solution, some samples showed histological changes that are incompatible with graft viability. CONCLUSION: Overall, Custodiol® appears to be the best medium for dermo-epidermal graft preservation. Moreover, the present findings suggest a maximum graft storage time of 11 days in all of the tested solutions. We do not recommend using grafts stored for 15 days, due to isolated signs of graft biodegradation with all solutions.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Paral, Jiri $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Slaninka, Igor $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zajak, Jan $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lesko, Michal $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Geryk, Tomas $u The Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Gerykova, Lucie $u The Fingerland Department of Pathology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sirovy, Miroslav $u Department of Military Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00215022 $t International journal of burns and trauma $x 2160-2026 $g Roč. 14, č. 2 (2024), s. 38-47
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38764893 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240723 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240726151453 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2125557 $s 1224867
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 14 $c 2 $d 38-47 $e 20240415 $i 2160-2026 $m International journal of burns and trauma $n Int. j. burns trauma $x MED00215022
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240723