-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of Cross-Sectional Area of Pubovisceral Muscle in Nulliparous and Primiparous Women
A. Regendova, A. Samesova, K. Zapletalova, S. Horejskova, Z. Svata, M. Hrdouskova, J. Zapletal, L. Krofta, L. Hajkova Hympanova
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Observational Study
Grant support
CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_073/0016935
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2010-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Pelvic Floor Disorders diagnostic imaging etiology MeSH
- Pelvic Floor * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Parity * MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Muscle Contraction physiology MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Ultrasonography MeSH
- Delivery, Obstetric MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The main risk factor for pelvic floor disorders is vaginal delivery, which may cause levator ani muscle (LAM) injury and denervation. LAM includes pubovisceral muscle (PVM, pubococcygeus), puborectalis muscle (PRM), and iliococcygeus muscle. We hypothesize that primiparous women with low pelvic floor muscle contraction have a reduced PVM cross-sectional area (CSA) compared to nulliparous women. METHODS (SAMPLE SIZE AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES): This single-centre prospective observational study compared healthy nulliparous (n = 40) to primiparous (n = 40) women after vaginal delivery without LAM avulsion and Oxford score ≤ 3. Demographics, questionnaires (ICIQ-UI-SF, OAB-Q-SF, PISQ-12), POP-Q, Oxford score, ultrasound measurements (minimal anteroposterior and lateral diameters, hiatal area, PRM thickness, levator-urethra gap) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-PVM CSA were evaluated. Normality was tested, and an appropriate test was used to compare the groups. Power calculation suggested 40 participants per group. RESULTS: The primiparous group was older, had a higher BMI, and their hiatal area on ultrasound at contraction was larger compared to the nulliparous group. The CSA of the left-sided PVM (1.15 ± 0.50 cm2) was larger compared to the right side (1.03 ± 0.50 cm2), p = 0.02 in nulliparous women. The PVM CSA of primiparous women with low Oxford score was reduced compared to nulliparous (0.87 ± 0.30 versus 1.09 ± 0.50 cm2, p = 0.006). The intra-rater reliability for PVM CSA had an ICC of 0.90 and inter-rater ICC of 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: Primiparous women after vaginal delivery with low pelvic floor contraction force had reduced PVM CSA on MRI images compared to nulliparous women.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24014472
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250204152125.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00192-024-05733-3 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38376549
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Regendová, Alexandra $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0328115
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of Cross-Sectional Area of Pubovisceral Muscle in Nulliparous and Primiparous Women / $c A. Regendova, A. Samesova, K. Zapletalova, S. Horejskova, Z. Svata, M. Hrdouskova, J. Zapletal, L. Krofta, L. Hajkova Hympanova
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The main risk factor for pelvic floor disorders is vaginal delivery, which may cause levator ani muscle (LAM) injury and denervation. LAM includes pubovisceral muscle (PVM, pubococcygeus), puborectalis muscle (PRM), and iliococcygeus muscle. We hypothesize that primiparous women with low pelvic floor muscle contraction have a reduced PVM cross-sectional area (CSA) compared to nulliparous women. METHODS (SAMPLE SIZE AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES): This single-centre prospective observational study compared healthy nulliparous (n = 40) to primiparous (n = 40) women after vaginal delivery without LAM avulsion and Oxford score ≤ 3. Demographics, questionnaires (ICIQ-UI-SF, OAB-Q-SF, PISQ-12), POP-Q, Oxford score, ultrasound measurements (minimal anteroposterior and lateral diameters, hiatal area, PRM thickness, levator-urethra gap) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-PVM CSA were evaluated. Normality was tested, and an appropriate test was used to compare the groups. Power calculation suggested 40 participants per group. RESULTS: The primiparous group was older, had a higher BMI, and their hiatal area on ultrasound at contraction was larger compared to the nulliparous group. The CSA of the left-sided PVM (1.15 ± 0.50 cm2) was larger compared to the right side (1.03 ± 0.50 cm2), p = 0.02 in nulliparous women. The PVM CSA of primiparous women with low Oxford score was reduced compared to nulliparous (0.87 ± 0.30 versus 1.09 ± 0.50 cm2, p = 0.006). The intra-rater reliability for PVM CSA had an ICC of 0.90 and inter-rater ICC of 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: Primiparous women after vaginal delivery with low pelvic floor contraction force had reduced PVM CSA on MRI images compared to nulliparous women.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a vedení porodu $7 D036861
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a svalová kontrakce $x fyziologie $7 D009119
- 650 12
- $a parita $7 D010298
- 650 12
- $a pánevní dno $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D017773
- 650 _2
- $a onemocnění dna pánevního $x diagnostické zobrazování $x etiologie $7 D059952
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie $7 D014463
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 700 1_
- $a Samesova, Adela $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Zapletalova, Katerina $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Horejskova, Sabina $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Svata, Zuzana $u Klinika JL-MR, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hrdouskova, Monika $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zapletal, Jan $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Krofta, Ladislav $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hajkova Hympanova, Lucie $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic. lucie.hympanova@upmd.eu
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 35, č. 4 (2024), s. 841-848
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38376549 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250204152126 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143929 $s 1226338
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 35 $c 4 $d 841-848 $e 20240220 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int Urogynecol J $x MED00002395
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_073/0016935 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725
