Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

New models for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung resection candidates

M. Svoboda, I. Cundrle, M. Plutinsky, P. Homolka, L. Mitas, Z. Chovanec, LJ. Olson, K. Brat

. 2024 ; 10 (4) : . [pub] 20240916

Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, ventilatory efficiency (minute ventilation (V'E)/carbon dioxide production (V'CO2 ) slope) and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2 ) have emerged as independent predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Single parameters may give only partial information regarding periprocedural hazards. Accordingly, our aim was to create prediction models with improved ability to stratify PPC risk in patients scheduled for elective lung resection surgery. METHODS: This post hoc analysis was comprised of consecutive lung resection candidates from two prior prospective trials. All individuals completed pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Logistic regression analyses were used for identification of risk factors for PPC that were entered into the final risk prediction models. Two risk models were developed; the first used rest PETCO2 (for patients with no available CPET data), the second used V'E/ V'CO2 slope (for patients with available CPET data). Receiver operating characteristic analysis with the De-Long test and area under the curve (AUC) were used for comparison of models. RESULTS: The dataset from 423 patients was randomly split into the derivation (n=310) and validation (n=113) cohorts. Two final models were developed, both including sex, thoracotomy, "atypical" resection and forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio as risk factors. In addition, the first model also included rest PETCO2 , while the second model used V'E/V'CO2 slope from CPET. AUCs of risk scores were 0.795 (95% CI: 0.739-0.851) and 0.793 (95% CI: 0.737-0.849); both p<0.001. No differences in AUCs were found between the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We created two multicomponental models for PPC risk prediction, both having excellent predictive properties.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24017808
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241016081829.0
007      
ta
008      
241008s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1183/23120541.00978-2023 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39286055
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Svoboda, Michal $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000303122524
245    10
$a New models for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung resection candidates / $c M. Svoboda, I. Cundrle, M. Plutinsky, P. Homolka, L. Mitas, Z. Chovanec, LJ. Olson, K. Brat
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: In recent years, ventilatory efficiency (minute ventilation (V'E)/carbon dioxide production (V'CO2 ) slope) and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2 ) have emerged as independent predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Single parameters may give only partial information regarding periprocedural hazards. Accordingly, our aim was to create prediction models with improved ability to stratify PPC risk in patients scheduled for elective lung resection surgery. METHODS: This post hoc analysis was comprised of consecutive lung resection candidates from two prior prospective trials. All individuals completed pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Logistic regression analyses were used for identification of risk factors for PPC that were entered into the final risk prediction models. Two risk models were developed; the first used rest PETCO2 (for patients with no available CPET data), the second used V'E/ V'CO2 slope (for patients with available CPET data). Receiver operating characteristic analysis with the De-Long test and area under the curve (AUC) were used for comparison of models. RESULTS: The dataset from 423 patients was randomly split into the derivation (n=310) and validation (n=113) cohorts. Two final models were developed, both including sex, thoracotomy, "atypical" resection and forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio as risk factors. In addition, the first model also included rest PETCO2 , while the second model used V'E/V'CO2 slope from CPET. AUCs of risk scores were 0.795 (95% CI: 0.739-0.851) and 0.793 (95% CI: 0.737-0.849); both p<0.001. No differences in AUCs were found between the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We created two multicomponental models for PPC risk prediction, both having excellent predictive properties.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cundrle, Ivan $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277098021
700    1_
$a Plutinsky, Marek $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Homolka, Pavel $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Mitas, Ladislav $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000266901181
700    1_
$a Chovanec, Zdenek $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u First Department of Surgery, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000166056013
700    1_
$a Olson, Lyle J $u Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
700    1_
$a Brat, Kristian $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000031674228X
773    0_
$w MED00198703 $t ERJ open research $x 2312-0541 $g Roč. 10, č. 4 (2024)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39286055 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241016081825 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2196377 $s 1229759
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 10 $c 4 $e 20240916 $i 2312-0541 $m ERJ open research $n ERJ Open Res $x MED00198703
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...