-
Something wrong with this record ?
New models for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung resection candidates
M. Svoboda, I. Cundrle, M. Plutinsky, P. Homolka, L. Mitas, Z. Chovanec, LJ. Olson, K. Brat
Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2015
PubMed Central
from 2015
Europe PubMed Central
from 2015
Open Access Digital Library
from 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2015
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, ventilatory efficiency (minute ventilation (V'E)/carbon dioxide production (V'CO2 ) slope) and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2 ) have emerged as independent predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Single parameters may give only partial information regarding periprocedural hazards. Accordingly, our aim was to create prediction models with improved ability to stratify PPC risk in patients scheduled for elective lung resection surgery. METHODS: This post hoc analysis was comprised of consecutive lung resection candidates from two prior prospective trials. All individuals completed pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Logistic regression analyses were used for identification of risk factors for PPC that were entered into the final risk prediction models. Two risk models were developed; the first used rest PETCO2 (for patients with no available CPET data), the second used V'E/ V'CO2 slope (for patients with available CPET data). Receiver operating characteristic analysis with the De-Long test and area under the curve (AUC) were used for comparison of models. RESULTS: The dataset from 423 patients was randomly split into the derivation (n=310) and validation (n=113) cohorts. Two final models were developed, both including sex, thoracotomy, "atypical" resection and forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio as risk factors. In addition, the first model also included rest PETCO2 , while the second model used V'E/V'CO2 slope from CPET. AUCs of risk scores were 0.795 (95% CI: 0.739-0.851) and 0.793 (95% CI: 0.737-0.849); both p<0.001. No differences in AUCs were found between the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We created two multicomponental models for PPC risk prediction, both having excellent predictive properties.
1st Department of Surgery St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Department of Respiratory Diseases University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Department of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Department of Surgery University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Ltd Brno Czech Republic
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24017808
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241016081829.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241008s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1183/23120541.00978-2023 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39286055
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Svoboda, Michal $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000303122524
- 245 10
- $a New models for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung resection candidates / $c M. Svoboda, I. Cundrle, M. Plutinsky, P. Homolka, L. Mitas, Z. Chovanec, LJ. Olson, K. Brat
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: In recent years, ventilatory efficiency (minute ventilation (V'E)/carbon dioxide production (V'CO2 ) slope) and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2 ) have emerged as independent predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Single parameters may give only partial information regarding periprocedural hazards. Accordingly, our aim was to create prediction models with improved ability to stratify PPC risk in patients scheduled for elective lung resection surgery. METHODS: This post hoc analysis was comprised of consecutive lung resection candidates from two prior prospective trials. All individuals completed pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Logistic regression analyses were used for identification of risk factors for PPC that were entered into the final risk prediction models. Two risk models were developed; the first used rest PETCO2 (for patients with no available CPET data), the second used V'E/ V'CO2 slope (for patients with available CPET data). Receiver operating characteristic analysis with the De-Long test and area under the curve (AUC) were used for comparison of models. RESULTS: The dataset from 423 patients was randomly split into the derivation (n=310) and validation (n=113) cohorts. Two final models were developed, both including sex, thoracotomy, "atypical" resection and forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio as risk factors. In addition, the first model also included rest PETCO2 , while the second model used V'E/V'CO2 slope from CPET. AUCs of risk scores were 0.795 (95% CI: 0.739-0.851) and 0.793 (95% CI: 0.737-0.849); both p<0.001. No differences in AUCs were found between the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We created two multicomponental models for PPC risk prediction, both having excellent predictive properties.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Cundrle, Ivan $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277098021
- 700 1_
- $a Plutinsky, Marek $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Homolka, Pavel $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Mitas, Ladislav $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000266901181
- 700 1_
- $a Chovanec, Zdenek $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u First Department of Surgery, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000166056013
- 700 1_
- $a Olson, Lyle J $u Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Brat, Kristian $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u International Clinical Research Center, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000031674228X
- 773 0_
- $w MED00198703 $t ERJ open research $x 2312-0541 $g Roč. 10, č. 4 (2024)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39286055 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241016081825 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2196377 $s 1229759
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 10 $c 4 $e 20240916 $i 2312-0541 $m ERJ open research $n ERJ Open Res $x MED00198703
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241008