-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Client-identified outcomes of individual psychotherapy: a qualitative meta-analysis
M. Ladmanová, T. Řiháček, L. Timulak, K. Jonášová, B. Kubantová, P. Mikoška, L. Polakovská, R. Elliott
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- duševní poruchy terapie psychologie MeSH
- kvalitativní výzkum MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- psychoterapie * metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Psychotherapy outcomes are typically measured in terms of symptom relief. However, this method might overlook important changes from clients' perspectives when they are asked to report on them. A more client-centred approach might bring a deeper understanding of psychotherapy outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes identified by clients within qualitative psychotherapy research. METHODS: The PsycArticles, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE Complete databases were searched for English language studies published until Nov 11, 2023. Additional studies were identified through references in the primary studies and previous meta-analyses or systematic reviews. Search terms were related to psychotherapy and counselling, clients' or patients' experiences, psychotherapy outcomes and changes, post-treatment perspectives, and types of qualitative methods. Qualitative studies on client-identified outcomes of individual psychotherapy were included. Findings related to clients' perceptions of psychotherapy outcomes were extracted (by ML and checked by TR and LT) and analysed (by all authors) using the descriptive-interpretative meta-analytic approach. All authors have personally experienced psychotherapy as clients. This study was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021277330). FINDINGS: We included 177 studies in the qualitative meta-analysis, from 24 countries, including descriptions from 2908 clients. Most of the studies were of good quality; they covered a wide range of therapeutic approaches and diagnoses. The descriptions of psychotherapy outcomes were classified into 60 meta-categories and grouped into ten clusters. These clusters related to clients' relational and social functioning; their emotional functioning; self-awareness, self-understanding, and more adaptive cognitive processing; behavioural functioning; developing their own resources; clients' attitudes towards themselves; generally embracing life; symptom and problem change; and more general wellbeing. The tenth cluster was outcomes that could not be clearly attributed to psychotherapy, which was considered outside the scope of this study. INTERPRETATION: The meta-analysis showed that clients value outcome dimensions beyond symptom reduction, such as deeper self-understanding, enhanced self-agency, and greater social engagement. By examining psychotherapy outcomes across various diagnoses and therapeutic approaches, we highlight limitations in traditional outcome measures, showing the need for more comprehensive, client-centred assessment tools and the value of incorporating qualitative methods into understanding dimensions of change. FUNDING: European Union.
Counselling Unit School of Psychological Sciences and Health University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK
Faculty of Arts Department of Psychology Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Faculty of Social Studies Department of Psychology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin University of Dublin Dublin Ireland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25002860
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250206103918.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250121s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00356-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39612923
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Ladmanová, Michaela $u Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Client-identified outcomes of individual psychotherapy: a qualitative meta-analysis / $c M. Ladmanová, T. Řiháček, L. Timulak, K. Jonášová, B. Kubantová, P. Mikoška, L. Polakovská, R. Elliott
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Psychotherapy outcomes are typically measured in terms of symptom relief. However, this method might overlook important changes from clients' perspectives when they are asked to report on them. A more client-centred approach might bring a deeper understanding of psychotherapy outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes identified by clients within qualitative psychotherapy research. METHODS: The PsycArticles, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE Complete databases were searched for English language studies published until Nov 11, 2023. Additional studies were identified through references in the primary studies and previous meta-analyses or systematic reviews. Search terms were related to psychotherapy and counselling, clients' or patients' experiences, psychotherapy outcomes and changes, post-treatment perspectives, and types of qualitative methods. Qualitative studies on client-identified outcomes of individual psychotherapy were included. Findings related to clients' perceptions of psychotherapy outcomes were extracted (by ML and checked by TR and LT) and analysed (by all authors) using the descriptive-interpretative meta-analytic approach. All authors have personally experienced psychotherapy as clients. This study was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021277330). FINDINGS: We included 177 studies in the qualitative meta-analysis, from 24 countries, including descriptions from 2908 clients. Most of the studies were of good quality; they covered a wide range of therapeutic approaches and diagnoses. The descriptions of psychotherapy outcomes were classified into 60 meta-categories and grouped into ten clusters. These clusters related to clients' relational and social functioning; their emotional functioning; self-awareness, self-understanding, and more adaptive cognitive processing; behavioural functioning; developing their own resources; clients' attitudes towards themselves; generally embracing life; symptom and problem change; and more general wellbeing. The tenth cluster was outcomes that could not be clearly attributed to psychotherapy, which was considered outside the scope of this study. INTERPRETATION: The meta-analysis showed that clients value outcome dimensions beyond symptom reduction, such as deeper self-understanding, enhanced self-agency, and greater social engagement. By examining psychotherapy outcomes across various diagnoses and therapeutic approaches, we highlight limitations in traditional outcome measures, showing the need for more comprehensive, client-centred assessment tools and the value of incorporating qualitative methods into understanding dimensions of change. FUNDING: European Union.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a duševní poruchy $x terapie $x psychologie $7 D001523
- 650 12
- $a psychoterapie $x metody $7 D011613
- 650 _2
- $a kvalitativní výzkum $7 D036301
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Řiháček, Tomáš $u Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: rihacek@fss.muni.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Timulak, Ladislav $u School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- 700 1_
- $a Jonášová, Klára $u Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kubantová, Barbora $u Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Mikoška, Petr $u Faculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Polakovská, Lucia $u Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Elliott, Robert $u Counselling Unit, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
- 773 0_
- $w MED00193477 $t The lancet. Psychiatry $x 2215-0374 $g Roč. 12, č. 1 (2025), s. 18-31
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39612923 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250121 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250206103914 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2262952 $s 1238867
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 12 $c 1 $d 18-31 $e 20241126 $i 2215-0374 $m The lancet. Psychiatry $n Lancet Psychiatry $x MED00193477
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250121