• Something wrong with this record ?

Determination of solid-state acidity of lyophilized trehalose containing citrate, phosphate, and histidine buffers using UV/VIS diffuse reflectance and solid-state NMR spectroscopy

A. Lay-Fortenbery, X. Yuan, L. Veselý, D. Heger, E. Shalaev, Y. Su, E. Munson

. 2024 ; 113 (12) : 3479-3488. [pub] 20240921

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003254

Changes in the protonation state of lyophilized proteins can impact structural integrity, chemical stability, and propensity to aggregate upon reconstitution. When a buffer is chosen, the freezing/drying process may result in dramatic changes in the protonation state of the protein due to ionization shift of the buffer. In order to determine whether protonation shifts are occurring, ionizable probes can be added to the formulation. Optical probes (dyes) have shown dramatic ionization changes in lyophilized products, but it is unclear whether the pH indicator is uniform throughout the matrix and whether the change in the pH indicator actually mirrors drug ionization changes. In solid-state NMR (SSNMR) spectroscopy, the chemical shift of the carbonyl carbon in carboxylic acids is very sensitive to the ionization state of the acid. Therefore, SSNMR can be used to measure ionization changes in a lyophilized matrix by employing a small quantity of an isotopically-labeled carboxylic acid species in the formulation. This paper compares the apparent pH of six trehalose-containing lyophilized buffer systems using SSNMR and UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UVDRS). Both SSNMR and UVDRS results using two different ionization probes (butyric acid and bromocresol purple, respectively) showed little change in apparent acidity compared to the pre-lyophilized solution in a sodium citrate buffer, but a greater change was observed in potassium phosphate, sodium phosphate, and histidine buffers. While the trends between the two methods were similar, there were differences in the numerical values of equivalent pH (pHeq) observed between the two methods. The potential causes contributing to the differences are discussed.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003254
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104211.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.xphs.2024.09.019 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39313152
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Lay-Fortenbery, Ashley $u Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40526, USA
245    10
$a Determination of solid-state acidity of lyophilized trehalose containing citrate, phosphate, and histidine buffers using UV/VIS diffuse reflectance and solid-state NMR spectroscopy / $c A. Lay-Fortenbery, X. Yuan, L. Veselý, D. Heger, E. Shalaev, Y. Su, E. Munson
520    9_
$a Changes in the protonation state of lyophilized proteins can impact structural integrity, chemical stability, and propensity to aggregate upon reconstitution. When a buffer is chosen, the freezing/drying process may result in dramatic changes in the protonation state of the protein due to ionization shift of the buffer. In order to determine whether protonation shifts are occurring, ionizable probes can be added to the formulation. Optical probes (dyes) have shown dramatic ionization changes in lyophilized products, but it is unclear whether the pH indicator is uniform throughout the matrix and whether the change in the pH indicator actually mirrors drug ionization changes. In solid-state NMR (SSNMR) spectroscopy, the chemical shift of the carbonyl carbon in carboxylic acids is very sensitive to the ionization state of the acid. Therefore, SSNMR can be used to measure ionization changes in a lyophilized matrix by employing a small quantity of an isotopically-labeled carboxylic acid species in the formulation. This paper compares the apparent pH of six trehalose-containing lyophilized buffer systems using SSNMR and UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UVDRS). Both SSNMR and UVDRS results using two different ionization probes (butyric acid and bromocresol purple, respectively) showed little change in apparent acidity compared to the pre-lyophilized solution in a sodium citrate buffer, but a greater change was observed in potassium phosphate, sodium phosphate, and histidine buffers. While the trends between the two methods were similar, there were differences in the numerical values of equivalent pH (pHeq) observed between the two methods. The potential causes contributing to the differences are discussed.
650    12
$a trehalosa $x chemie $7 D014199
650    12
$a lyofilizace $x metody $7 D005612
650    _2
$a pufry $7 D002021
650    _2
$a koncentrace vodíkových iontů $7 D006863
650    12
$a histidin $x chemie $7 D006639
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční spektroskopie $x metody $7 D009682
650    12
$a fosfáty $x chemie $7 D010710
650    _2
$a kyselina citronová $x chemie $7 D019343
650    _2
$a spektrofotometrie ultrafialová $x metody $7 D013056
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Yuan, Xiaoda $u Development Sciences, Research and Development, AbbVie Inc., 2525 Dupont Drive, Irvine, CA 92612, USA
700    1_
$a Veselý, Lukáš $u Masaryk University, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Kamenice 5-A8, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Heger, Dominik $u Masaryk University, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Kamenice 5-A8, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Shalaev, Evgenyi $u Development Sciences, Research and Development, AbbVie Inc., 2525 Dupont Drive, Irvine, CA 92612, USA
700    1_
$a Su, Yongchao $u Analytical Research and Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey 07065, United States
700    1_
$a Munson, Eric $u Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40526, USA; Current address: Department of Industrial and Molecular Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. Electronic address: munsone@purdue.edu
773    0_
$w MED00002895 $t Journal of pharmaceutical sciences $x 1520-6017 $g Roč. 113, č. 12 (2024), s. 3479-3488
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39313152 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104207 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263168 $s 1239261
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 113 $c 12 $d 3479-3488 $e 20240921 $i 1520-6017 $m Journal of pharmaceutical sciences $n J Pharm Sci $x MED00002895
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options