Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of toric intraocular lens tilt and decentration measurement using dynamic Purkinje-meter and anterior segment optical coherence tomography

E. Palkovicova, J. Cendelin, J. Novak

. 2025 ; 169 (1) : 56-65. [pub] 20240611

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25008980

AIMS: To present a new method of dynamic Purkinje-metry and to verify it by comparison with a commercially available anterior segment optical coherence tomography CASIA2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A dynamic Purkinje-meter with a movable fixation target was assembled. A coaxial circular pattern formed by infrared LEDs was projected onto the eye and evoked Purkinje images (1st, 3rd, 4th = P1, P3, P4). The measurement was performed on 29 eyes with an implanted toric IOL (intraocular lens), under mydriatic conditions, with reference to the visual axis. The IOL tilt was calculated from the position of a fixation target at the moment of P3 and P4 superposition. The IOL decentration was determined based on the relative position of P1 during on-axis fixation and of P3 and P4 superposition during off-axis fixation. A custom-developed software was used for distance measurements. Using CASIA2, the IOL position was fully calculated by the device. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference between CASIA2 and Purkinje-meter values was 0.6° ± 0.4° for the tilt magnitude and 10° ± 10° for the tilt direction, and 0.11 mm ± 0.08 mm for the decentration magnitude and 16° ± 14° for the decentration direction. There was no statistically significant difference between the values determined by the two methods for the tilt and decentration direction. The differences were statistically significant for the tilt and decentration magnitude. CONCLUSION: The values of IOL tilt and decentration direction are similar for both devices. The values of IOL tilt and decentration magnitude measured by Purkinje-meter are higher than those from CASIA2, but overall, they correspond to the values presented in other published studies.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25008980
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250521143020.0
007      
ta
008      
250411s2025 xr ad f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5507/bp.2024.017 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38868995
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Palkovičová, Eliška $u Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic $7 _AN097408
245    10
$a Comparison of toric intraocular lens tilt and decentration measurement using dynamic Purkinje-meter and anterior segment optical coherence tomography / $c E. Palkovicova, J. Cendelin, J. Novak
520    9_
$a AIMS: To present a new method of dynamic Purkinje-metry and to verify it by comparison with a commercially available anterior segment optical coherence tomography CASIA2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A dynamic Purkinje-meter with a movable fixation target was assembled. A coaxial circular pattern formed by infrared LEDs was projected onto the eye and evoked Purkinje images (1st, 3rd, 4th = P1, P3, P4). The measurement was performed on 29 eyes with an implanted toric IOL (intraocular lens), under mydriatic conditions, with reference to the visual axis. The IOL tilt was calculated from the position of a fixation target at the moment of P3 and P4 superposition. The IOL decentration was determined based on the relative position of P1 during on-axis fixation and of P3 and P4 superposition during off-axis fixation. A custom-developed software was used for distance measurements. Using CASIA2, the IOL position was fully calculated by the device. RESULTS: The mean absolute difference between CASIA2 and Purkinje-meter values was 0.6° ± 0.4° for the tilt magnitude and 10° ± 10° for the tilt direction, and 0.11 mm ± 0.08 mm for the decentration magnitude and 16° ± 14° for the decentration direction. There was no statistically significant difference between the values determined by the two methods for the tilt and decentration direction. The differences were statistically significant for the tilt and decentration magnitude. CONCLUSION: The values of IOL tilt and decentration direction are similar for both devices. The values of IOL tilt and decentration magnitude measured by Purkinje-meter are higher than those from CASIA2, but overall, they correspond to the values presented in other published studies.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a nitrooční čočky $7 D007910
650    _2
$a optická koherentní tomografie $7 D041623
650    12
$a optické zobrazování $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D061848
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Cendelín, Jiří $u Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic $u Department of Ophthalmology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0073752
700    1_
$a Novák, Jiří $u Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic $u Department of Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $7 _AN060799
773    0_
$w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia $x 1804-7521 $g Roč. 169, č. 1 (2025), s. 56-65
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38868995 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20250411 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250521143017 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2324856 $s 1246058
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 169 $c 1 $d 56-65 $e 20240611 $i 1804-7521 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia $n Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub $x MED00012606
LZP    __
$b NLK124 $a Pubmed-20250411

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace