• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The Current State of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Outcomes from the Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) Esophageal Registry

CD. Kooij, C. de Jongh, BF. Kingma, MI. van Berge Henegouwen, SS. Gisbertz, YK. Chao, PW. Chiu, P. Rouanet, A. Mourregot, A. Immanuel, T. Mala, GI. van Boxel, NC. Carter, H. Li, HF. Fuchs, CJ. Bruns, S. Giacopuzzi, JC. Kalff, JP. Hölzen, MA....

. 2025 ; 32 (2) : 823-833. [pub] 20241104

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25010108

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly adopted in centers worldwide, with ongoing refinements to enhance results. This study aims to assess the current state of RAMIE worldwide and to identify potential areas for improvement. METHODS: This descriptive study analyzed prospective data from esophageal cancer patients who underwent transthoracic RAMIE in Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) centers. Main endpoints included textbook outcome rate, surgical techniques, and perioperative outcomes. Analyses were performed separately for intrathoracic (Ivor-Lewis) and cervical anastomosis (McKeown), divided into three time cohorts (2016-2018, 2019-2020, 2021-2023). A sensitivity analysis was conducted with cases after the learning curve (> 70 cases). RESULTS: Across 28 UGIRA centers, 2012 Ivor-Lewis and 1180 McKeown procedures were performed. Over the time cohorts, textbook outcome rates were 39%, 48%, and 49% for Ivor-Lewis, and 49%, 63%, and 61% for McKeown procedures, respectively. Fully robotic procedures accounted for 66%, 51%, and 60% of Ivor-Lewis procedures, and 53%, 81%, and 66% of McKeown procedures. Lymph node yield showed 27, 30, and 30 nodes in Ivor-Lewis procedures, and 26, 26, and 34 nodes in McKeown procedures. Furthermore, high mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 65%, 43%, and 37%, and 70%, 48%, and 64% of Ivor-Lewis and McKeown procedures, respectively. Anastomotic leakage rates were 22%, 22%, and 16% in Ivor-Lewis cases, and 14%, 12%, and 11% in McKeown cases. Hospital stay was 13, 14, and 13 days for Ivor-Lewis procedures, and 12, 9, and 11 days for McKeown procedures. In Ivor-Lewis and McKeown, respectively, the sensitivity analysis revealed textbook outcome rates of 43%, 54%, and 51%, and 47%, 64%, and 64%; anastomotic leakage rates of 28%, 18%, and 15%, and 13%, 11%, and 10%; and hospital stay of 11, 12, and 12 days, and 10, 9, and 9 days. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates favorable outcomes over time in achieving textbook outcome after RAMIE. Areas for improvement include a reduction of anastomotic leakage and shortening of hospital stay.

Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linko Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway

Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China

Federico 2 University of Naples Naples Italy

Israelitisches Krankenhaus Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Montpellier Cancer Institute Montpellier France

Motol University Hospital 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan

National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust Portsmouth UK

Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle Upon Tyne Newcastle upon Tyne UK

Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China

Shanghai Chest Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai China

St Franziskus Hospital Münster Germany

Univ Lille CNRS Inserm CHU Lille UMR9020 U1277 CANTHER Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies Lille France

Universitätsklinikum Münster Münster Germany

University Digestive Healthcare Basel Switzerland

University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany

University Hospital of Bonn Bonn Germany

University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Germany

University Medical Center Utrecht University Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

University of Cologne Cologne Germany

University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA

University of Verona Verona Italy

University Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh PA USA

ZGT Almelo Almelo The Netherlands

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25010108
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429134507.0
007      
ta
008      
250415s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1245/s10434-024-16364-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39496901
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kooij, Cezanne D $u University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
245    14
$a The Current State of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Outcomes from the Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) Esophageal Registry / $c CD. Kooij, C. de Jongh, BF. Kingma, MI. van Berge Henegouwen, SS. Gisbertz, YK. Chao, PW. Chiu, P. Rouanet, A. Mourregot, A. Immanuel, T. Mala, GI. van Boxel, NC. Carter, H. Li, HF. Fuchs, CJ. Bruns, S. Giacopuzzi, JC. Kalff, JP. Hölzen, MA. Juratli, F. Benedix, E. Lorenz, JH. Egberts, JW. Haveman, B. van Etten, BP. Müller, PP. Grimminger, F. Berlth, G. Piessen, JW. van den Berg, M. Milone, JD. Luketich, IS. Sarkaria, RAA. Sallum, MJ. van Det, EA. Kouwenhoven, M. Brüwer, T. Harustiak, T. Kinoshita, T. Fujita, H. Daiko, Z. Li, JP. Ruurda, R. van Hillegersberg, UGIRA Study Group
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly adopted in centers worldwide, with ongoing refinements to enhance results. This study aims to assess the current state of RAMIE worldwide and to identify potential areas for improvement. METHODS: This descriptive study analyzed prospective data from esophageal cancer patients who underwent transthoracic RAMIE in Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) centers. Main endpoints included textbook outcome rate, surgical techniques, and perioperative outcomes. Analyses were performed separately for intrathoracic (Ivor-Lewis) and cervical anastomosis (McKeown), divided into three time cohorts (2016-2018, 2019-2020, 2021-2023). A sensitivity analysis was conducted with cases after the learning curve (> 70 cases). RESULTS: Across 28 UGIRA centers, 2012 Ivor-Lewis and 1180 McKeown procedures were performed. Over the time cohorts, textbook outcome rates were 39%, 48%, and 49% for Ivor-Lewis, and 49%, 63%, and 61% for McKeown procedures, respectively. Fully robotic procedures accounted for 66%, 51%, and 60% of Ivor-Lewis procedures, and 53%, 81%, and 66% of McKeown procedures. Lymph node yield showed 27, 30, and 30 nodes in Ivor-Lewis procedures, and 26, 26, and 34 nodes in McKeown procedures. Furthermore, high mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed in 65%, 43%, and 37%, and 70%, 48%, and 64% of Ivor-Lewis and McKeown procedures, respectively. Anastomotic leakage rates were 22%, 22%, and 16% in Ivor-Lewis cases, and 14%, 12%, and 11% in McKeown cases. Hospital stay was 13, 14, and 13 days for Ivor-Lewis procedures, and 12, 9, and 11 days for McKeown procedures. In Ivor-Lewis and McKeown, respectively, the sensitivity analysis revealed textbook outcome rates of 43%, 54%, and 51%, and 47%, 64%, and 64%; anastomotic leakage rates of 28%, 18%, and 15%, and 13%, 11%, and 10%; and hospital stay of 11, 12, and 12 days, and 10, 9, and 9 days. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates favorable outcomes over time in achieving textbook outcome after RAMIE. Areas for improvement include a reduction of anastomotic leakage and shortening of hospital stay.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a ezofagektomie $x metody $7 D016629
650    12
$a nádory jícnu $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D004938
650    12
$a roboticky asistované výkony $x metody $7 D065287
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a registrace $7 D012042
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony $x metody $7 D019060
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a de Jongh, Cas $u University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Kingma, B Feike $u University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I $u Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands $u Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Gisbertz, Suzanne S $u Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands $u Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Chao, Yin-Kai $u Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linko, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
700    1_
$a Chiu, Philip W $u Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
700    1_
$a Rouanet, Philippe $u Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
700    1_
$a Mourregot, Anne $u Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
700    1_
$a Immanuel, Arul $u Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
700    1_
$a Mala, Tom $u Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
700    1_
$a van Boxel, Gijs I $u Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
700    1_
$a Carter, Nicholas C $u Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
700    1_
$a Li, Hecheng $u Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
700    1_
$a Fuchs, Hans F $u University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
700    1_
$a Bruns, Christiane J $u University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
700    1_
$a Giacopuzzi, Simone $u University of Verona, Verona, Italy
700    1_
$a Kalff, Jörg C $u University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
700    1_
$a Hölzen, Jens-Peter $u Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
700    1_
$a Juratli, Mazen A $u Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
700    1_
$a Benedix, Frank $u University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Lorenz, Eric $u University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Egberts, Jan-Hendrik $u Israelitisches Krankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Haveman, Jan W $u University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a van Etten, Boudewijn $u University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Müller, Beat P $u University Digestive Healthcare, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Grimminger, Peter P $u University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
700    1_
$a Berlth, Felix $u University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
700    1_
$a Piessen, Guillaume $u Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Lille, France
700    1_
$a van den Berg, Jan W $u University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Milone, Marco $u "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
700    1_
$a Luketich, James D $u University Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
700    1_
$a Sarkaria, Inderpal S $u University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
700    1_
$a Sallum, Rubens A A $u University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
700    1_
$a van Det, Marc J $u ZGT Almelo, Almelo, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Kouwenhoven, Ewout A $u ZGT Almelo, Almelo, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Brüwer, Matthias $u St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
700    1_
$a Harustiak, Tomas $u Motol University Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kinoshita, Takahiro $u National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
700    1_
$a Fujita, Takeo $u National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
700    1_
$a Daiko, Hiroyuki $u National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
700    1_
$a Li, Zhigang $u Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
700    1_
$a Ruurda, Jelle P $u University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a van Hillegersberg, Richard $u University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. R.vanHillegersberg@umcutrecht.nl
710    2_
$a UGIRA Study Group
773    0_
$w MED00000441 $t Annals of surgical oncology $x 1534-4681 $g Roč. 32, č. 2 (2025), s. 823-833
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39496901 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429134503 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311465 $s 1247189
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 32 $c 2 $d 823-833 $e 20241104 $i 1534-4681 $m Annals of surgical oncology $n Ann Surg Oncol $x MED00000441
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...