Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Predictors of response to intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with dermatomyositis: the ProDERM study

C. Charles-Schoeman, J. Schessl, Z. Bata-Csörgő, MM. Dimachkie, Z. Griger, S. Moiseev, CV. Oddis, E. Schiopu, J. Vencovský, E. Clodi, T. Levine, R. Aggarwal

. 2025 ; 64 (6) : 3767-3776. [pub] 20250601

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Multicenter Study

Grant support
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.H.
Portland Medical Communications Ltd
Octapharma
AstraZeneca

OBJECTIVES: The phase 3 ProDERM study demonstrated intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) was safe and effective in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). This analysis assessed clinical and serological predictors of IVIg response in DM patients from ProDERM. METHODS: ProDERM was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study of DM patients. For weeks 0-16, patients received 2.0 g/kg IVIg (Octagam, 10%) or placebo every 4 weeks. Eligible patients entered the open-label extension phase, where all received IVIg to week 40. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined associations between baseline variables and total improvement score (TIS), including myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT; assessing different organ involvement), and myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled. Univariate analyses found no significant association between TIS at week 16 or 40 and age; sex; ethnicity; disease duration/activity; cutaneous, skeletal, gastrointestinal or muscle disease activity; or previous failed or concomitant medications. Multivariate analysis found patients with higher MDAAT cutaneous scores had a better chance of at least minimal TIS improvement. Higher MDAAT pulmonary scores were associated with a lower, but still considerable, chance of improvement. Patients with TIF1-γ antibodies had a better TIS response; however, after controlling for cutaneous disease activity, there was no significant association between antibody classification (including anti-TIF1-γ) and efficacy outcome. CONCLUSION: IVIg was effective in treating DM patients regardless of demographic features and autoantibody status (for most autoantibodies). Patients with higher cutaneous disease activity and/or anti-TIF1-γ responded best to IVIg, while pulmonary disease activity predicted a lower, but still effective, IVIg response, warranting further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02728752.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015561
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091056.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf070 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39918968
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Charles-Schoeman, Christina $u Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
245    10
$a Predictors of response to intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with dermatomyositis: the ProDERM study / $c C. Charles-Schoeman, J. Schessl, Z. Bata-Csörgő, MM. Dimachkie, Z. Griger, S. Moiseev, CV. Oddis, E. Schiopu, J. Vencovský, E. Clodi, T. Levine, R. Aggarwal
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: The phase 3 ProDERM study demonstrated intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) was safe and effective in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). This analysis assessed clinical and serological predictors of IVIg response in DM patients from ProDERM. METHODS: ProDERM was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study of DM patients. For weeks 0-16, patients received 2.0 g/kg IVIg (Octagam, 10%) or placebo every 4 weeks. Eligible patients entered the open-label extension phase, where all received IVIg to week 40. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined associations between baseline variables and total improvement score (TIS), including myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT; assessing different organ involvement), and myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled. Univariate analyses found no significant association between TIS at week 16 or 40 and age; sex; ethnicity; disease duration/activity; cutaneous, skeletal, gastrointestinal or muscle disease activity; or previous failed or concomitant medications. Multivariate analysis found patients with higher MDAAT cutaneous scores had a better chance of at least minimal TIS improvement. Higher MDAAT pulmonary scores were associated with a lower, but still considerable, chance of improvement. Patients with TIF1-γ antibodies had a better TIS response; however, after controlling for cutaneous disease activity, there was no significant association between antibody classification (including anti-TIF1-γ) and efficacy outcome. CONCLUSION: IVIg was effective in treating DM patients regardless of demographic features and autoantibody status (for most autoantibodies). Patients with higher cutaneous disease activity and/or anti-TIF1-γ responded best to IVIg, while pulmonary disease activity predicted a lower, but still effective, IVIg response, warranting further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02728752.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a dermatomyozitida $x farmakoterapie $x imunologie $7 D003882
650    12
$a intravenózní imunoglobuliny $x terapeutické užití $7 D016756
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a autoprotilátky $x krev $x imunologie $7 D001323
650    12
$a imunologické faktory $x terapeutické užití $7 D007155
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Schessl, Joachim $u Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
700    1_
$a Bata-Csörgő, Zsuzsanna $u Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
700    1_
$a Dimachkie, Mazen M $u Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
700    1_
$a Griger, Zoltan $u Division of Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
700    1_
$a Moiseev, Sergey $u Tareev Clinic of Internal Diseases, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
700    1_
$a Oddis, Chester V $u Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
700    1_
$a Schiopu, Elena $u Division of Rheumatology, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
700    1_
$a Vencovský, Jiri $u Institute of Rheumatology, Research Department, and Department of Rheumatology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000208510713 $7 jo20000080529
700    1_
$a Clodi, Elisabeth $u Global Medical and Scientific Affairs, Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges m.b.H., Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Levine, Todd $u Phoenix Neurological Associates, Ltd, Phoenix, AZ, USA
700    1_
$a Aggarwal, Rohit $u Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000175318038
773    0_
$w MED00011379 $t Rheumatology $x 1462-0332 $g Roč. 64, č. 6 (2025), s. 3767-3776
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39918968 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091051 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366419 $s 1252686
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 64 $c 6 $d 3767-3776 $e 20250601 $i 1462-0332 $m Rheumatology $n Rheumatology (Oxford) $x MED00011379
GRA    __
$p Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.H.
GRA    __
$p Portland Medical Communications Ltd
GRA    __
$p Octapharma
GRA    __
$p AstraZeneca
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...