Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Breadth of immune response, immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety for a pentavalent meningococcal ABCWY vaccine in healthy adolescents and young adults: results from a phase 3, randomised, controlled observer-blinded trial

T. Nolan, C. Bhusal, J. Beran, M. Bloch, BS. Cetin, EC. Dinleyici, D. Dražan, S. Kokko, S. Koski, O. Laajalahti, JM. Langley, M. Rämet, PC. Richmond, P. Silas, B. Tapiero, F. Tiong, M. Tipton, B. Ukkonen, B. Ulukol, M. Lattanzi, M. Trapani, A....

. 2025 ; 25 (5) : 560-573. [pub] 20241205

Language English Country United States

Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Equivalence Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2001-08-01 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2001-08-01 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2001-08-01 to 2 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 2001-08-01 to 2 months ago

BACKGROUND: A multicomponent meningococcal serogroups ABCWY vaccine (MenABCWY) could provide broad protection against disease-causing meningococcal strains and simplify the immunisation schedule. The aim of this trial was to confirm the effect of the licensed meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine, 4CMenB, against diverse MenB strains, and to assess the breadth of immune response against a panel of 110 MenB strains for MenABCWY containing the antigenic components of 4CMenB and licensed serogroups ACWY vaccine, MenACWY-CRM, the non-inferiority of the immune response with MenABCWY versus 4CMenB and MenACWY-CRM, safety, and MenABCWY lot-to-lot consistency. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3 randomised, controlled, observer-blinded trial of healthy adolescents and young adults (age 10-25 years) across 114 centres in Australia, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, Türkiye, and the USA. Exclusion criteria included previous vaccination with a MenB vaccine or (within the last 4 years) MenACWY vaccine. Participants were randomly allocated (5:5:3:3:3:1 ratio) via a central randomisation system using a minimisation procedure to receive 4CMenB at months 0, 2, and 6 (referred to as 4CMenB 0-2-6 hereafter); or 4CMenB at months 0 and 6 (referred to as 4CMenB 0-6 hereafter); or MenABCWY (three groups, each receiving one production lot of the MenACWY-CRM component) at months 0 and 6; or MenACWY-CRM at month 0. Demonstration in the per-protocol set of the consistency of three MenACWY-CRM component lots of the MenABCWY vaccine was a primary objective (demonstrated with two-sided 95% CIs for the ratio of human serum bactericidal antibody [hSBA] geometric mean titres against each serogroup within predefined criteria [0·5-2·0]). The primary endpoints (breadth of immune response) for the MenB component of MenABCWY and 4CMenB were measured using the endogenous complement hSBA (enc-hSBA) assay against a panel of 110 diverse MenB invasive disease strains. For each serum sample, 35 strains from the 110 MenB strain panel were randomly selected for testing. The 4CMenB breadth of immune response data have been published separately. For MenABCWY, breadth of immune response was assessed in two analyses: a test-based analysis of the percentage of samples (tests) without bactericidal serum activity against MenB strains 1 month after two MenABCWY doses versus the percentage after one MenACWY-CRM dose in the per-protocol set, and a responder-based analysis of the percentage of participants (responders) whose sera killed 70% or more strains at 1 month after two MenABCWY doses in the full analysis set. A lower limit of two-sided 95% CI above 65% would demonstrate breadth of immune response. Other primary outcomes included non-inferiority (5% margin) of two MenABCWY doses versus two 4CMenB doses by enc-hSBA assay in the per-protocol set, non-inferiority (10% margin) of two MenABCWY doses versus one MenACWY-CRM dose in MenACWY vaccine-naive participants by traditional hSBA assay in the per-protocol set, and safety in all vaccinated participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04502693, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Aug 14, 2020, and Sept 3, 2021, 3651 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated (900 in the 4CMenB 0-2-6 group and 908 in the 4CMenB 0-6 group, 1666 in the three MenABCWY groups combined, and 177 in the MenACWY-CRM group). All primary objectives for MenABCWY were met. Consistency of immune responses against the three production lots of the MenACWY component of MenABCWY was demonstrated since two-sided 95% CIs for the ratios of hSBA geometric mean titres against serogroups A, C, W, and Y for each pair of lots were within the predefined equivalence criteria. The lot data were pooled for the remainder of MenABCWY endpoints. By enc-hSBA assay, breadth of immune response against the MenB strain panel was 77·9% (95% CI 76·6 to 79·2) in the test-based analysis and 84·1% (81·4 to 86·5; 687 of 817 participants) in the responder-based analysis. Non-inferiority of MenABCWY to 4CMenB was demonstrated by enc-hSBA assay: the difference in percentage of samples with bactericidal serum activity between the MenABCWY group (82·5% [95% CI 82·1 to 83·0]; 21 222 of 25 715) and 4CMenB 0-2 group (83·1% [82·7 to 83·6]; 22 921 of 27 569) was -0·61% (-1·25 to 0·03). Non-inferiority of two-dose MenABCWY to one-dose MenACWY-CRM was demonstrated by traditional hSBA assay, with differences between the MenABCWY group and MenACWY group in percentages of participants with a four-fold rise in hSBA titres of 11·3% (5·9 to 19·0) for serogroup A, 47·2% (38·1 to 56·3) for serogroup C, 35·3% (26·9 to 44·5) for serogroup W, and 27·0% (19·4 to 35·8) for serogroup Y. MenABCWY reactogenicity was mostly of mild or moderate severity and transient, with similar frequencies of adverse events in the MenABCWY and 4CMenB groups and no safety concerns were identified. INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates breadth of immune response against a panel of 110 MenB strains for the MenB component of the investigational MenABCWY vaccine, when administered as a 0-6 months schedule to the target population of adolescents and young adults, with predefined criteria for success met for both breadth of immune response endpoints and for non-inferiority versus 4CMenB. This investigational vaccine could provide broad meningococcal serogroup coverage in a simplified immunisation schedule, thus aiding the public health attempt in preventing invasive meningococcal disease due to five Neisseria meningitidis serogroups in adolescents and young adults. FUNDING: GSK.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015988
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091420.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00667-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39647494
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Nolan, Terry $u Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group, Peter Doherty Institute and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
245    10
$a Breadth of immune response, immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety for a pentavalent meningococcal ABCWY vaccine in healthy adolescents and young adults: results from a phase 3, randomised, controlled observer-blinded trial / $c T. Nolan, C. Bhusal, J. Beran, M. Bloch, BS. Cetin, EC. Dinleyici, D. Dražan, S. Kokko, S. Koski, O. Laajalahti, JM. Langley, M. Rämet, PC. Richmond, P. Silas, B. Tapiero, F. Tiong, M. Tipton, B. Ukkonen, B. Ulukol, M. Lattanzi, M. Trapani, A. Willemsen, D. Toneatto, QUINTET study group
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: A multicomponent meningococcal serogroups ABCWY vaccine (MenABCWY) could provide broad protection against disease-causing meningococcal strains and simplify the immunisation schedule. The aim of this trial was to confirm the effect of the licensed meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine, 4CMenB, against diverse MenB strains, and to assess the breadth of immune response against a panel of 110 MenB strains for MenABCWY containing the antigenic components of 4CMenB and licensed serogroups ACWY vaccine, MenACWY-CRM, the non-inferiority of the immune response with MenABCWY versus 4CMenB and MenACWY-CRM, safety, and MenABCWY lot-to-lot consistency. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3 randomised, controlled, observer-blinded trial of healthy adolescents and young adults (age 10-25 years) across 114 centres in Australia, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, Türkiye, and the USA. Exclusion criteria included previous vaccination with a MenB vaccine or (within the last 4 years) MenACWY vaccine. Participants were randomly allocated (5:5:3:3:3:1 ratio) via a central randomisation system using a minimisation procedure to receive 4CMenB at months 0, 2, and 6 (referred to as 4CMenB 0-2-6 hereafter); or 4CMenB at months 0 and 6 (referred to as 4CMenB 0-6 hereafter); or MenABCWY (three groups, each receiving one production lot of the MenACWY-CRM component) at months 0 and 6; or MenACWY-CRM at month 0. Demonstration in the per-protocol set of the consistency of three MenACWY-CRM component lots of the MenABCWY vaccine was a primary objective (demonstrated with two-sided 95% CIs for the ratio of human serum bactericidal antibody [hSBA] geometric mean titres against each serogroup within predefined criteria [0·5-2·0]). The primary endpoints (breadth of immune response) for the MenB component of MenABCWY and 4CMenB were measured using the endogenous complement hSBA (enc-hSBA) assay against a panel of 110 diverse MenB invasive disease strains. For each serum sample, 35 strains from the 110 MenB strain panel were randomly selected for testing. The 4CMenB breadth of immune response data have been published separately. For MenABCWY, breadth of immune response was assessed in two analyses: a test-based analysis of the percentage of samples (tests) without bactericidal serum activity against MenB strains 1 month after two MenABCWY doses versus the percentage after one MenACWY-CRM dose in the per-protocol set, and a responder-based analysis of the percentage of participants (responders) whose sera killed 70% or more strains at 1 month after two MenABCWY doses in the full analysis set. A lower limit of two-sided 95% CI above 65% would demonstrate breadth of immune response. Other primary outcomes included non-inferiority (5% margin) of two MenABCWY doses versus two 4CMenB doses by enc-hSBA assay in the per-protocol set, non-inferiority (10% margin) of two MenABCWY doses versus one MenACWY-CRM dose in MenACWY vaccine-naive participants by traditional hSBA assay in the per-protocol set, and safety in all vaccinated participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04502693, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Aug 14, 2020, and Sept 3, 2021, 3651 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated (900 in the 4CMenB 0-2-6 group and 908 in the 4CMenB 0-6 group, 1666 in the three MenABCWY groups combined, and 177 in the MenACWY-CRM group). All primary objectives for MenABCWY were met. Consistency of immune responses against the three production lots of the MenACWY component of MenABCWY was demonstrated since two-sided 95% CIs for the ratios of hSBA geometric mean titres against serogroups A, C, W, and Y for each pair of lots were within the predefined equivalence criteria. The lot data were pooled for the remainder of MenABCWY endpoints. By enc-hSBA assay, breadth of immune response against the MenB strain panel was 77·9% (95% CI 76·6 to 79·2) in the test-based analysis and 84·1% (81·4 to 86·5; 687 of 817 participants) in the responder-based analysis. Non-inferiority of MenABCWY to 4CMenB was demonstrated by enc-hSBA assay: the difference in percentage of samples with bactericidal serum activity between the MenABCWY group (82·5% [95% CI 82·1 to 83·0]; 21 222 of 25 715) and 4CMenB 0-2 group (83·1% [82·7 to 83·6]; 22 921 of 27 569) was -0·61% (-1·25 to 0·03). Non-inferiority of two-dose MenABCWY to one-dose MenACWY-CRM was demonstrated by traditional hSBA assay, with differences between the MenABCWY group and MenACWY group in percentages of participants with a four-fold rise in hSBA titres of 11·3% (5·9 to 19·0) for serogroup A, 47·2% (38·1 to 56·3) for serogroup C, 35·3% (26·9 to 44·5) for serogroup W, and 27·0% (19·4 to 35·8) for serogroup Y. MenABCWY reactogenicity was mostly of mild or moderate severity and transient, with similar frequencies of adverse events in the MenABCWY and 4CMenB groups and no safety concerns were identified. INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates breadth of immune response against a panel of 110 MenB strains for the MenB component of the investigational MenABCWY vaccine, when administered as a 0-6 months schedule to the target population of adolescents and young adults, with predefined criteria for success met for both breadth of immune response endpoints and for non-inferiority versus 4CMenB. This investigational vaccine could provide broad meningococcal serogroup coverage in a simplified immunisation schedule, thus aiding the public health attempt in preventing invasive meningococcal disease due to five Neisseria meningitidis serogroups in adolescents and young adults. FUNDING: GSK.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    _2
$a protilátky bakteriální $x krev $7 D000907
650    _2
$a zdraví dobrovolníci pro lékařské studie $7 D064368
650    12
$a imunogenicita vakcíny $7 D000071497
650    12
$a meningokokové infekce $x prevence a kontrola $x imunologie $7 D008589
650    12
$a meningokokové vakcíny $x imunologie $x škodlivé účinky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D022401
650    _2
$a Neisseria meningitidis $x imunologie $7 D009345
650    _2
$a Neisseria meningitidis séroskupiny B $x imunologie $7 D038541
650    _2
$a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
655    _2
$a hodnocení ekvivalence $7 D000073843
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Bhusal, Chiranjiwi $u GSK, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: chiranjiwi.x.bhusal@gsk.com
700    1_
$a Beran, Jiří $u Vaccination and Travel Medicine Centre, Hradec Králové, Czechia
700    1_
$a Bloch, Mark $u Holdsworth House Medical Practice, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
700    1_
$a Cetin, Benhur Sirvan $u Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Türkiye
700    1_
$a Dinleyici, Ener Cagri $u Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir, Türkiye
700    1_
$a Dražan, Daniel $u General Practice for Children and Adolescents, Jindřichův Hradec, Czechia
700    1_
$a Kokko, Satu $u Tampereen yliopisto Oulun rokotetutkimusklinikka, Oulu, Finland
700    1_
$a Koski, Susanna $u Tampereen yliopisto Etelä-Helsingin rokotetutkimusklinikka, Helsinki, Finland
700    1_
$a Laajalahti, Outi $u Tampereen yliopisto, Seinajoen rokotetutkimusklinikka, Seinajoki, Finland
700    1_
$a Langley, Joanne M $u Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health and NS Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
700    1_
$a Rämet, Mika $u Finnish Vaccine Research, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
700    1_
$a Richmond, Peter C $u School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, and Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia
700    1_
$a Silas, Peter $u Wee Care Pediatrics, Syracuse, UT, USA
700    1_
$a Tapiero, Bruce $u CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
700    1_
$a Tiong, Florence $u AusTrials (Wellers Hill), Tarragindi, QLD, Australia
700    1_
$a Tipton, Mary $u Copperview Medical Center, South Jordan, UT, USA
700    1_
$a Ukkonen, Benita $u Tampereen yliopisto, Espoon rokotetutkimusklinikka, Espoo, Finland
700    1_
$a Ulukol, Betul $u Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
700    1_
$a Lattanzi, Maria $u GSK, Siena, Italy
700    1_
$a Trapani, Mauro $u GSK, Siena, Italy
700    1_
$a Willemsen, Arnold $u GSK, Amsterdam, Netherlands
700    1_
$a Toneatto, Daniela $u GSK, Siena, Italy
710    2_
$a QUINTET study group
773    0_
$w MED00006437 $t Lancet. Infectious diseases $x 1474-4457 $g Roč. 25, č. 5 (2025), s. 560-573
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39647494 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091415 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366679 $s 1253113
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 25 $c 5 $d 560-573 $e 20241205 $i 1474-4457 $m Lancet. Infectious diseases $n Lancet Infect Dis $x MED00006437
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...