-
Something wrong with this record ?
Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound examination in preoperative pelvic staging of early-stage cervical cancer: post-hoc analysis of SENTIX study
D. Cibula, C. Köhler, J. Jarkovský, R. Kocián, P. Dundr, J. Klát, I. Zapardiel, F. Landoni, F. Frühauf, R. Fischbach, M. Borčinová, D. Fischerová
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
BBM LM2023033
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
EF16_013/0001674
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
CZ-DRO-VFN64165
Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
NV19-03-00023
Czech Health Research Council
UNCE/24/MED/018
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Cooperatio - Maternal and Childhood Care; Neonat
PubMed
40130299
DOI
10.1002/uog.29205
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lymphatic Metastasis diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Lymph Nodes pathology diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging * methods MeSH
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms * pathology diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Pelvis diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Preoperative Care methods MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging methods MeSH
- Ultrasonography methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVES: SENTIX was a prospective, single-arm, international multicenter study that evaluated sentinel lymph node biopsy without pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. We aimed to evaluate the concordance between preoperative imaging modalities (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound) and final pathology in the clinical staging of early-stage cervical cancer by post-hoc analysis of the SENTIX study data. METHODS: In total, 47 sites across 18 countries participated in the SENTIX study. Patients with Stage IA1/lymphovascular space invasion-positive to IB2 (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification (2018)) cervical cancer, with usual histological types and no suspicious lymph nodes on imaging, were prospectively enrolled between May 2016 and October 2020. Preoperative pelvic clinical staging on either pelvic MRI or ultrasound examination was mandatory. Tumor size discrepancy (< 10 mm vs ≥ 10 mm) between imaging and pathology, as well as the negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI and ultrasound for parametrial involvement and lymph node macrometastasis, were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 690 eligible prospectively enrolled patients, MRI and ultrasound were used as the staging imaging modality in 322 (46.7%) and 298 (43.2%) patients, respectively. A discrepancy of tumor size ≥ 10 mm was reported between ultrasound and final pathology in 39/298 (13.1%) patients and between MRI and pathology in 53/322 (16.5%), with no significant difference in the accuracy of tumor measurement between the two imaging modalities. The NPV of ultrasound in assessing parametrial infiltration and lymph node involvement was 97.0% (95% CI, 0.95-0.99%) and 94.0% (95% CI, 0.91-0.97%), respectively, and that of MRI was 95.3% (95% CI, 0.93-0.98%) and 94.1% (95% CI, 0.92-0.97%), respectively, with no significant differences between the parameters. Ultrasound and MRI were comparable regarding the tumor size measurement (P = 0.452), failure to detect parametrial involvement (P = 0.624) and failure to detect macrometastases in sentinel lymph node (P = 0.876). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic ultrasound examination and MRI had similar concordance with histology in the assessment of tumor size and of parametrial and lymph node invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. Ultrasound examination should be considered part of preoperative pelvic clinical staging in early-stage cervical cancer, especially in limited-resource regions where MRI is unavailable. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Department of Gynecology Asklepios Clinic Hamburg Altona Berlin Germany
Department of Gynecology DRK Klinik Berlin Westend Berlin Germany
Department of Radiology Asklepios Clinic Hamburg Altona Berlin Germany
Gynecologic Oncology Unit La Paz University Hospital Madrid Spain
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
UNIMIB IRCCS San Gerardo Monza Italy
University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25016234
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250731091627.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250708s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/uog.29205 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40130299
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Cibula, D $u Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000163879356 $7 jo20000074072
- 245 10
- $a Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound examination in preoperative pelvic staging of early-stage cervical cancer: post-hoc analysis of SENTIX study / $c D. Cibula, C. Köhler, J. Jarkovský, R. Kocián, P. Dundr, J. Klát, I. Zapardiel, F. Landoni, F. Frühauf, R. Fischbach, M. Borčinová, D. Fischerová
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: SENTIX was a prospective, single-arm, international multicenter study that evaluated sentinel lymph node biopsy without pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. We aimed to evaluate the concordance between preoperative imaging modalities (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound) and final pathology in the clinical staging of early-stage cervical cancer by post-hoc analysis of the SENTIX study data. METHODS: In total, 47 sites across 18 countries participated in the SENTIX study. Patients with Stage IA1/lymphovascular space invasion-positive to IB2 (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification (2018)) cervical cancer, with usual histological types and no suspicious lymph nodes on imaging, were prospectively enrolled between May 2016 and October 2020. Preoperative pelvic clinical staging on either pelvic MRI or ultrasound examination was mandatory. Tumor size discrepancy (< 10 mm vs ≥ 10 mm) between imaging and pathology, as well as the negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI and ultrasound for parametrial involvement and lymph node macrometastasis, were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 690 eligible prospectively enrolled patients, MRI and ultrasound were used as the staging imaging modality in 322 (46.7%) and 298 (43.2%) patients, respectively. A discrepancy of tumor size ≥ 10 mm was reported between ultrasound and final pathology in 39/298 (13.1%) patients and between MRI and pathology in 53/322 (16.5%), with no significant difference in the accuracy of tumor measurement between the two imaging modalities. The NPV of ultrasound in assessing parametrial infiltration and lymph node involvement was 97.0% (95% CI, 0.95-0.99%) and 94.0% (95% CI, 0.91-0.97%), respectively, and that of MRI was 95.3% (95% CI, 0.93-0.98%) and 94.1% (95% CI, 0.92-0.97%), respectively, with no significant differences between the parameters. Ultrasound and MRI were comparable regarding the tumor size measurement (P = 0.452), failure to detect parametrial involvement (P = 0.624) and failure to detect macrometastases in sentinel lymph node (P = 0.876). CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic ultrasound examination and MRI had similar concordance with histology in the assessment of tumor size and of parametrial and lymph node invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. Ultrasound examination should be considered part of preoperative pelvic clinical staging in early-stage cervical cancer, especially in limited-resource regions where MRI is unavailable. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a nádory děložního čípku $x patologie $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D002583
- 650 12
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $x metody $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie $x metody $7 D014463
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a pánev $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D010388
- 650 _2
- $a předoperační péče $x metody $7 D011300
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické metastázy $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D008207
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny $7 D021701
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické uzliny $x patologie $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D008198
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Köhler, C $u Department of Gynecology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg Altona, Berlin, Germany $u Department of Gynecology, DRK Klinik Berlin Westend, Berlin, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Jarkovský, J $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kocián, R $u Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dundr, P $u Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Klát, J $u University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zapardiel, I $u Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Landoni, F $u UNIMIB-IRCCS-San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Frühauf, F $u Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fischbach, R $u Department of Radiology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg Altona, Berlin, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Borčinová, M $u Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fischerová, D $u Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010717 $t Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $x 1469-0705 $g Roč. 65, č. 4 (2025), s. 495-502
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40130299 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250708 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250731091621 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2366818 $s 1253359
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 65 $c 4 $d 495-502 $e 20250325 $i 1469-0705 $m Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $n Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $x MED00010717
- GRA __
- $a BBM LM2023033 $p Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
- GRA __
- $a EF16_013/0001674 $p Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
- GRA __
- $a CZ-DRO-VFN64165 $p Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
- GRA __
- $a NV19-03-00023 $p Czech Health Research Council
- GRA __
- $a UNCE/24/MED/018 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Cooperatio - Maternal and Childhood Care; Neonat
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250708