-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparative Study Evaluating a New Dose Optimization Software for Gamma Knife Treatment Planning: Comparison of 80 Challenging Treatment Plans
L. Hamáčková, J. Novotný, M. Farníková, R. Liščák, G. Šimonová, D. Urgošík, M. Schmitt
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie
PubMed
40435990
DOI
10.1159/000546214
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- celková dávka radioterapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- meningeální nádory radioterapie MeSH
- meningeom radioterapie chirurgie MeSH
- nádory hypofýzy radioterapie chirurgie MeSH
- nádory mozku * radioterapie sekundární chirurgie MeSH
- plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače * metody MeSH
- radiochirurgie * metody MeSH
- software * MeSH
- vestibulární schwannom radioterapie chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
INTRODUCTION: In 2020, Elekta Instrument AB, Stockholm, released a new dose optimizer for Leksell GammaPlan, which includes the possibility of inverse planning. This study aimed to compare the new software with the previous manual version of treatment planning for stereotactic radiosurgery and evaluate its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four types of diagnoses - vestibular schwannomas, pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, and single brain metastasis - along with 80 clinically approved challenging cases, were selected for testing the new software. Key parameters, including coverage, selectivity, target volume, and doses to critical structures, were collected and statistically analysed using a t test. These parameters were compared based on the Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) Society standardization document for stereotactic radiosurgery, both for each diagnosis and for the entire dataset. RESULTS: The new software showed a clear advantage, particularly in sparing critical structures while maintaining or improving treatment plan conformity. Doses to critical structures such as the optic nerve, brainstem, cochlea, and pituitary gland decreased by an average of 13% (0.76 Gy), 7% (0.52 Gy), 7% (0.2 Gy), and 14% (1.04 Gy), respectively, reducing toxicity. Other plan parameters also showed significant improvements, except for the gradient index. Selectivity improved by 11% (0.03), the Shaw Conformity Index improved by 10% (0.1), and coverage improved by 0.01. Additionally, treatment time was reduced by 10% enhancing patient comfort. CONCLUSION: Overall, LGK Lightning is faster and produces treatment plans with superior parameters compared to manual planning.
Department of Medical Physics Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czechia
Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czechia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25022656
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20251023080514.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 251014s2025 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1159/000546214 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40435990
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Hamáčková, Lucie $u Department of Medical Physics, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia $u Department of Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Comparative Study Evaluating a New Dose Optimization Software for Gamma Knife Treatment Planning: Comparison of 80 Challenging Treatment Plans / $c L. Hamáčková, J. Novotný, M. Farníková, R. Liščák, G. Šimonová, D. Urgošík, M. Schmitt
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: In 2020, Elekta Instrument AB, Stockholm, released a new dose optimizer for Leksell GammaPlan, which includes the possibility of inverse planning. This study aimed to compare the new software with the previous manual version of treatment planning for stereotactic radiosurgery and evaluate its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four types of diagnoses - vestibular schwannomas, pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, and single brain metastasis - along with 80 clinically approved challenging cases, were selected for testing the new software. Key parameters, including coverage, selectivity, target volume, and doses to critical structures, were collected and statistically analysed using a t test. These parameters were compared based on the Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) Society standardization document for stereotactic radiosurgery, both for each diagnosis and for the entire dataset. RESULTS: The new software showed a clear advantage, particularly in sparing critical structures while maintaining or improving treatment plan conformity. Doses to critical structures such as the optic nerve, brainstem, cochlea, and pituitary gland decreased by an average of 13% (0.76 Gy), 7% (0.52 Gy), 7% (0.2 Gy), and 14% (1.04 Gy), respectively, reducing toxicity. Other plan parameters also showed significant improvements, except for the gradient index. Selectivity improved by 11% (0.03), the Shaw Conformity Index improved by 10% (0.1), and coverage improved by 0.01. Additionally, treatment time was reduced by 10% enhancing patient comfort. CONCLUSION: Overall, LGK Lightning is faster and produces treatment plans with superior parameters compared to manual planning.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a radiochirurgie $x metody $7 D016634
- 650 12
- $a software $7 D012984
- 650 12
- $a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
- 650 _2
- $a nádory hypofýzy $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D010911
- 650 _2
- $a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
- 650 _2
- $a vestibulární schwannom $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D009464
- 650 12
- $a nádory mozku $x radioterapie $x sekundární $x chirurgie $7 D001932
- 650 _2
- $a meningeom $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D008579
- 650 _2
- $a meningeální nádory $x radioterapie $7 D008577
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Novotný, Josef $u Department of Medical Physics, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Farníková, Markéta $u Department of Medical Physics, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Liščák, Roman $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Šimonová, Gabriela $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Urgošík, Dušan $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Schmitt, Michal $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004437 $t Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery $x 1423-0372 $g Roč. 103, č. 4 (2025), s. 269-278
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40435990 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20251014 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20251023080519 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2417427 $s 1260819
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 103 $c 4 $d 269-278 $e 20250528 $i 1423-0372 $m Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery $n Stereotact Funct Neurosurg $x MED00004437
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20251014