• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparative Study Evaluating a New Dose Optimization Software for Gamma Knife Treatment Planning: Comparison of 80 Challenging Treatment Plans

L. Hamáčková, J. Novotný, M. Farníková, R. Liščák, G. Šimonová, D. Urgošík, M. Schmitt

. 2025 ; 103 (4) : 269-278. [pub] 20250528

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25022656

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, Elekta Instrument AB, Stockholm, released a new dose optimizer for Leksell GammaPlan, which includes the possibility of inverse planning. This study aimed to compare the new software with the previous manual version of treatment planning for stereotactic radiosurgery and evaluate its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four types of diagnoses - vestibular schwannomas, pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, and single brain metastasis - along with 80 clinically approved challenging cases, were selected for testing the new software. Key parameters, including coverage, selectivity, target volume, and doses to critical structures, were collected and statistically analysed using a t test. These parameters were compared based on the Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) Society standardization document for stereotactic radiosurgery, both for each diagnosis and for the entire dataset. RESULTS: The new software showed a clear advantage, particularly in sparing critical structures while maintaining or improving treatment plan conformity. Doses to critical structures such as the optic nerve, brainstem, cochlea, and pituitary gland decreased by an average of 13% (0.76 Gy), 7% (0.52 Gy), 7% (0.2 Gy), and 14% (1.04 Gy), respectively, reducing toxicity. Other plan parameters also showed significant improvements, except for the gradient index. Selectivity improved by 11% (0.03), the Shaw Conformity Index improved by 10% (0.1), and coverage improved by 0.01. Additionally, treatment time was reduced by 10% enhancing patient comfort. CONCLUSION: Overall, LGK Lightning is faster and produces treatment plans with superior parameters compared to manual planning.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25022656
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20251023080514.0
007      
ta
008      
251014s2025 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1159/000546214 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40435990
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Hamáčková, Lucie $u Department of Medical Physics, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia $u Department of Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
245    10
$a Comparative Study Evaluating a New Dose Optimization Software for Gamma Knife Treatment Planning: Comparison of 80 Challenging Treatment Plans / $c L. Hamáčková, J. Novotný, M. Farníková, R. Liščák, G. Šimonová, D. Urgošík, M. Schmitt
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: In 2020, Elekta Instrument AB, Stockholm, released a new dose optimizer for Leksell GammaPlan, which includes the possibility of inverse planning. This study aimed to compare the new software with the previous manual version of treatment planning for stereotactic radiosurgery and evaluate its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four types of diagnoses - vestibular schwannomas, pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, and single brain metastasis - along with 80 clinically approved challenging cases, were selected for testing the new software. Key parameters, including coverage, selectivity, target volume, and doses to critical structures, were collected and statistically analysed using a t test. These parameters were compared based on the Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) Society standardization document for stereotactic radiosurgery, both for each diagnosis and for the entire dataset. RESULTS: The new software showed a clear advantage, particularly in sparing critical structures while maintaining or improving treatment plan conformity. Doses to critical structures such as the optic nerve, brainstem, cochlea, and pituitary gland decreased by an average of 13% (0.76 Gy), 7% (0.52 Gy), 7% (0.2 Gy), and 14% (1.04 Gy), respectively, reducing toxicity. Other plan parameters also showed significant improvements, except for the gradient index. Selectivity improved by 11% (0.03), the Shaw Conformity Index improved by 10% (0.1), and coverage improved by 0.01. Additionally, treatment time was reduced by 10% enhancing patient comfort. CONCLUSION: Overall, LGK Lightning is faster and produces treatment plans with superior parameters compared to manual planning.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a radiochirurgie $x metody $7 D016634
650    12
$a software $7 D012984
650    12
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
650    _2
$a nádory hypofýzy $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D010911
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a vestibulární schwannom $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D009464
650    12
$a nádory mozku $x radioterapie $x sekundární $x chirurgie $7 D001932
650    _2
$a meningeom $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D008579
650    _2
$a meningeální nádory $x radioterapie $7 D008577
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Novotný, Josef $u Department of Medical Physics, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Farníková, Markéta $u Department of Medical Physics, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Liščák, Roman $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Šimonová, Gabriela $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Urgošík, Dušan $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Schmitt, Michal $u Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00004437 $t Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery $x 1423-0372 $g Roč. 103, č. 4 (2025), s. 269-278
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40435990 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20251014 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20251023080519 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2417427 $s 1260819
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 103 $c 4 $d 269-278 $e 20250528 $i 1423-0372 $m Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery $n Stereotact Funct Neurosurg $x MED00004437
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20251014

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...