• This record comes from PubMed

Ultracytochemical localization of the vacuolar marker enzymes alkaline phosphatase, adenosine triphosphatase, carboxypeptidase Y and aminopeptidase reveal new concept of vacuole biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

. 1989 ; 92 (5) : 421-32.

Language English Country Germany Media print

Document type Journal Article

Logarithmic cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains LBG H 1022, FL-100, X 2180 1A and 1B were studied together with the mutants pep4-3, sec18-1 and sec7-1. The necessary ultrastructural observations showed that, as a rule, juvenile vacuoles were formed de novo from perinuclear endoplasmic reticulum cisternae (ER) packed and inflated with electron-dense (polyanionic) matrix material. This process was disturbed solely in the sec18-1 mutant under non-permissive conditions. The vacuolar marker enzymes adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) and alkaline phosphohydrolase (ALPase) were assayed by the ultracytochemical cerium precipitation technique. The neutral ATPase was active in vacuolar membranes and in the previously shown (coated) microglobules nearby. ALPase activity was detected in microglobules inside juvenile vacuoles, inside nucleus and in the cytoplasm as well as in the membrane vesicles and in the periplasm. The sites of vacuolar protease carboxypeptidase Y (CPY) activity were assayed using N-CBZ-L-tyrosine-4-methoxy-2-naphthyl-amide (CBZ-Tyr-MNA) as substrate and sites of the amino-peptidase M activity using Leu-MNA as substrate. Hexazotized p-rosaniline served as a coupler for the primary reaction product of both the above proteases (MNA) and the resulting azo-dye was osmicated during postfixation. The CPY reaction product was found in both polar layers of vacuolar membranes (homologous to ER) and in ER membranes enclosing condensed lipoprotein bodies which were taken up by the vacuoles of late logarithmic yeast. Both before and after the uptake into the vacuoles the bodies contained the CPY reaction product in concentric layers or in cavities. Microglobules with CPY activity were also observed. Aminopeptidase was localized in microglobules inside the juvenile vacuoles. These findings combined with the previous cytochemical localizations of polyphosphates and X-prolyl-dipeptidyl (amino)peptidase in S. cerevisiae suggest the following cytologic mechanism for the biosynthetic protein transport: coated microglobules convey metabolites and enzymes either to the cell surface for secretion or enter the vacuoles in all phases of the cell cycle. The membrane vesicles represent an alternative secretory mechanism present in yeast cells only during budding. The homology of the ER with the vacuolar membranes and with the surface membranes of the lipoprotein condensates (bodies) indicates a cotranslational entry of the CPY into these membranes. The secondary transfer of a portion of CPY into vacuoles is probably mediated by the lipoprotein uptake process.

See more in PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1972 Jan;109(1):196-202 PubMed

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 Oct 18;72(4):1430-6 PubMed

Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Feb;6(2):723-9 PubMed

Histochem J. 1985 May;17(5):535-7 PubMed

Mikrobiologiia. 1986 Jan-Feb;55(1):116-9 PubMed

J Histochem Cytochem. 1981 Mar;29(3A Suppl):481-93 PubMed

Arch Mikrobiol. 1970;70(2):89-103 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1981 Nov 10;256(21):10859-63 PubMed

Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):439-48 PubMed

EMBO J. 1987 Jul;6(7):2157-63 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1977 Aug;131(2):638-44 PubMed

J Ultrastruct Res. 1985 Jul-Aug;92(1-2):1-27 PubMed

Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):451-60 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;105(4):1539-47 PubMed

J Membr Biol. 1986;94(2):83-97 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Mar;68(3):636-40 PubMed

Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1986;2:179-99 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Nov 10;527(1):31-41 PubMed

J Histochem Cytochem. 1983 Oct;31(10 ):1197-208 PubMed

Histochem J. 1980 Jan;12(1):57-69 PubMed

J Biochem. 1975 Jan 1;77(1?):69-79 PubMed

Genetics. 1982 Dec;102(4):665-77 PubMed

J Ultrastruct Res. 1979 Jul;68(1):38-45 PubMed

J Ultrastruct Res. 1975 Apr;51(1):32-9 PubMed

Zentralbl Mikrobiol. 1982;137(5):421-32 PubMed

Cell Mol Biol. 1988;34(6):629-37 PubMed

Eur J Cell Biol. 1987 Apr;43(2):189-94 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Oct 13;741(1):128-35 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208-12 PubMed

Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:115-43 PubMed

Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):461-9 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1982 Nov;152(2):865-73 PubMed

Eur J Biochem. 1974 Oct 1;48(1):117-7 PubMed

Annu Rev Genet. 1984;18:233-70 PubMed

Adv Microb Physiol. 1980;21:267-338 PubMed

J Histochem Cytochem. 1987 Mar;35(3):327-33 PubMed

Histochemistry. 1986;84(1):87-96 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 May 20;643(3):572-82 PubMed

Cell Mol Biol. 1982;28(2):221-33 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1984 Jan;98(1):341-6 PubMed

Cell. 1980 Aug;21(1):205-15 PubMed

Planta. 1971 Mar;96(1):43-53 PubMed

Nature. 1962 Sep 22;195:1225-7 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1988 Jun;170(6):2775-83 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1369-83 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1974 Jun;61(3):599-612 PubMed

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982 Feb 11;104(3):950-6 PubMed

Exp Cell Res. 1967 Jan;45(1):133-47 PubMed

Acta Histochem Suppl. 1984;30:9-28 PubMed

Arch Mikrobiol. 1967 Jun 6;57(2):135-46 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(23):9075-9 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):1971-9 PubMed

J Ultrastruct Res. 1979 Jul;68(1):28-37 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options

Loading data ...