• This record comes from PubMed

Dependence of the kinetics of secondary active transports in yeast on H(+)-ATPase acidification

. 1994 Feb ; 138 (1) : 29-35.

Language English Country United States Media print

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Acidification of the external medium of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mainly caused by proton extrusion by plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase, was inhibited to different degrees by D2O, diethylstilbestrol, suloctidil, vanadate, erythrosin B, cupric sulfate and dicyclohexylcarbodiimide. The same pattern of inhibition was found with the uptake of amino acids, adenine, uracil, and phosphate and sulfate anions. An increase of the acidification rate by dioctanoylglycerol also increased the rates of uptake of adenine and of glutamic acid. In contrast, a decrease of the membrane potential at pH 4.5 from a mean of -40 to -20 mV caused by 20 mM KCl had no effect on the transport rates. The ATPase-deficient mutant S. cerevisiae pmal-105 showed a markedly lower uptake of all the above solutes as compared with the wild type, while its membrane potential and delta pH were unchanged. Other types of acidification (spontaneous upon suspension; K+ stimulated) did not affect the secondary uptake systems. A partially competitive inhibition between some individual transport systems was observed, most pronouncedly with adenine as the most avidly transported solute. These observations, together with the earlier results that inhibition of H(+)-ATPase activity affects more the acidic than the basic amino acids and that it is more pronounced at higher pH values and at greater solute concentrations, support the view that it is the protons in or at the membrane, as they are extruded by the ATPase, that govern the rates of uptake by secondary active transport systems in yeast.

See more in PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Jul 3;549(1):55-99 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Sep 27;766(3):679-84 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Jul 22;1136(1):57-67 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Nov 2;513(2):296-300 PubMed

Biochem J. 1975 Mar;146(3):705-12 PubMed

Adv Microb Physiol. 1982;23:1-78, 269-70 PubMed

Cell Mol Biol. 1985;31(3):195-200 PubMed

FEBS Lett. 1983 May 30;156(1):11-4 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Mar 2;1104(2):293-8 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Sep 27;698(3):243-51 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1988 Dec 5;263(34):18118-22 PubMed

J Membr Biol. 1984;77(2):123-52 PubMed

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1966 Aug;41(3):445-502 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Feb 20;551(1):197-206 PubMed

Trends Biochem Sci. 1993 Jul;18(7):243-6 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Dec 17;768(3-4):257-92 PubMed

Biochem Int. 1992 Dec;28(6):1089-96 PubMed

Trends Biochem Sci. 1988 Jan;13(1):5-7 PubMed

Science. 1969 Dec 12;166(3911):1359-64 PubMed

Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:71-97 PubMed

Yeast. 1987 Dec;3(4):263-70 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 May 20;643(3):572-82 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1993;38(6):467-72 PubMed

J Gen Microbiol. 1979 Feb;110(2):323-32 PubMed

FEBS Lett. 1992 Apr 6;300(3):271-4 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1975;20(6):496-503 PubMed

FEBS Lett. 1982 Apr 5;140(1):22-6 PubMed

FEBS Lett. 1975 Mar 15;52(1):100-2 PubMed

FEBS Lett. 1990 May 21;264(2):203-5 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1980 Jun 25;255(12):5735-41 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Sep 21;505(1):1-44 PubMed

Science. 1973 Dec 21;182(4118):1258-61 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...