Effects of the Fenton reagent on transport in yeast
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
11501417
DOI
10.1007/bf02818720
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- aktivní transport účinky léků MeSH
- aminokyseliny metabolismus MeSH
- fungální proteiny metabolismus MeSH
- kinetika MeSH
- koncentrace vodíkových iontů MeSH
- metabolismus sacharidů MeSH
- peroxid vodíku farmakologie MeSH
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- Saccharomycetales účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- transportní proteiny metabolismus MeSH
- železo farmakologie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- aminokyseliny MeSH
- Fenton's reagent MeSH Prohlížeč
- fungální proteiny MeSH
- peroxid vodíku MeSH
- transportní proteiny MeSH
- železo MeSH
In the facultatively anaerobic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae the uptake rate and the accumulation ratio of 2-aminoisobutyric acid was decreased by some 30% by Fenton's reagent (FR), a powerful source of OH. radicals. Likewise, the uptake of glutamic acid, leucine and arginine was diminished. The mediated diffusion of 6-deoxy-D-glucose was not affected. The H+ symport of maltose and trehalose was inhibited by some 40% both in the initial rate and in the accumulation ratio. FR had a dramatic inhibitory effect when present during preincubation with 50 mmol/L glucose. In the obligately aerobic Lodderomyces elongisporus the uptake of all amino acids tested was decreased by 15-30%, that of 6-deoxy-D-glucose by about 10%. The initial rates of uptake of maltose and trehalose were depressed by FR by 40% and the acceleration of uptake observed after 8 min of incubation, was abolished by FR completely. Acidification rate of the external medium by S. cerevisiae in the presence of glucose or galactose was enhanced three-fold, that after subsequently added K+ was substantially decreased. FR appears to have a dual effect on sugar and amino acid transport processes in yeast: (1) it blocks carrier protein synthesis; (2) it inhibits the source of energy for transport. It does not appreciably affect the carrier proteins themselves.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Theor Biol. 1972 Apr;35(1):113-8 PubMed
Cell Biol Int. 1994 Aug;18(8):813-7 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Sep 27;698(3):243-51 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Mar 10;1469(1):1-30 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1999;44(6):587-624 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1993;38(2):135-40 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1971;16(6):432-44 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Nov 2;288(2):380-9 PubMed
Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1998 Dec;46(5):973-8 PubMed
J Membr Biol. 1994 Feb;138(1):29-35 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1998;43(4):361-7 PubMed
Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1998 Feb;44(2):371-80 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1993;38(6):467-72 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1979 Feb;110(2):323-32 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1975;20(6):496-503 PubMed
Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1997 Apr;41(5):933-40 PubMed