Comparison of cryofixation and aldehyde fixation for plant actin immunocytochemistry: aldehydes do not destroy F-actin

. 2000 Aug ; 32 (8) : 457-66.

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid11095070

For walled plant cells, the immunolocalization of actin microfilaments, also known as F-actin, has proved to be much trickier than that of microtubules. These difficulties are commonly attributed to the high sensitivity of F-actin to aldehyde fixatives. Therefore, most plant studies have been accomplished using fluorescent phallotoxins in fresh tissues. Nevertheless, concerns regarding the questionable ability of phallotoxins to bind the whole complement of F-actin necessitate further optimization of actin immunofluorescence methods. We have compared two procedures: (1) formaldehyde fixation and (2) rapid freezing and freeze substitution (cryofixation), both followed by embedding in low-melting polyester wax. Actin immunofluorescence in sections of garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.) root gave similar results with both methods. The compatibility of aldehydes with actin immunodetection was further confirmed by the freeze-shattering technique that does not require embedding after aldehyde fixation. It appears that rather than aldehyde fixation, some further steps in the procedures used for actin visualization are critical for preserving F-actin. Wax embedding, combined with formaldehyde fixation, has proved to be also suitable for the detection of a wide range of other antigens.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Plant J. 1999 Aug;19(4):481-8 PubMed

Microsc Res Tech. 1999 Oct 1;47(1):3-17 PubMed

Plant Cell Physiol. 1996 Oct;37(7):1013-21 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1997 Apr;113(4):1447-55 PubMed

Planta. 1993;191:231-7 PubMed

Protoplasma. 1997;196(3-4):212-23 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1996 Oct;112(2):455-461 PubMed

Nature. 1957 Jun 29;179(4574):1345 PubMed

J Cell Sci. 1992 Apr;101 ( Pt 4):731-43 PubMed

Planta. 1992 Jun;187(3):405-13 PubMed

Planta. 1989 Jan;177(1):47-57 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):387-95 PubMed

Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1989;12(4):216-24 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5262-6 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1987 Apr;104(4):995-1004 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2157-66 PubMed

Am J Med Technol. 1967 Sep-Oct;33(5):394-6 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1981 Aug;90(2):459-66 PubMed

J Immunol Methods. 1981;43(3):349-50 PubMed

J Cell Sci. 1995 Nov;108 ( Pt 11):3397-403 PubMed

J Microsc. 1996 May;182(Pt 2):149-61 PubMed

Histochem J. 1996 May;28(5):353-60 PubMed

Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1997;36(1):55-67 PubMed

J Histochem Cytochem. 1997 Jan;45(1):89-95 PubMed

Eur J Cell Biol. 1997 Feb;72(2):113-21 PubMed

Cytobios. 1996;87(349):71-8 PubMed

J Microsc. 1997 Aug;187(Pt 2):77-84 PubMed

J Microsc. 1997 Oct;188(Pt 1):51-61 PubMed

Plant J. 1997 Nov;12(5):1035-43 PubMed

Planta. 1998 May;205(1):39-50 PubMed

Plant J. 1998 Nov;16(3):393-401 PubMed

Eur J Cell Biol. 1998 Dec;77(4):303-12 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...