Antiemetic efficacy of three serotonin antagonists during high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in malignant lymphoma
Jazyk angličtina Země Slovensko Médium print
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
11130251
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antagonisté serotoninu terapeutické užití MeSH
- antiemetika terapeutické užití MeSH
- autologní transplantace MeSH
- cytarabin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- etoposid aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- granisetron terapeutické užití MeSH
- indoly terapeutické užití MeSH
- karmustin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- kombinovaná terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfom farmakoterapie terapie MeSH
- melfalan aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- nauzea prevence a kontrola MeSH
- ondansetron terapeutické užití MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk škodlivé účinky MeSH
- tropisetron MeSH
- zvracení prevence a kontrola MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antagonisté serotoninu MeSH
- antiemetika MeSH
- cytarabin MeSH
- etoposid MeSH
- granisetron MeSH
- indoly MeSH
- karmustin MeSH
- melfalan MeSH
- ondansetron MeSH
- tropisetron MeSH
The aim of this study was to compare antiemetic efficacy of three serotonin antagonists, granisetron, tropisetron and ondansetron, during conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Forty-five malignant lymphoma patients (mean age 38 years, M:F 30:15), undergoing the highly emetogenic regimen BEAM prior to ASCT, were randomized to receive IV granisetron (G) 3 mg once a day, IV tropisetron (T) 5 mg once a day, or IV ondansetron (0) 8 mg twice daily, for six days. The treatment groups were comparable with respect to age, sex and previous experience of nausea and/or vomiting. Nausea and/or emesis control failure was defined as a nausea lasting > or = 4 hours and/or > or = 3 episodes of vomiting/24 h, emesis control failure as > or = 3 episodes of vomiting/24 h. Both the period of chemotherapy (6 days) and the whole period of observation (10 days) were evaluated. Nausea and/or emesis control failure occurred in 24% of patients during the period of chemotherapy and in 51% of patients throughout the whole period of observation, while emesis control failed in 2% and 27% of patients, respectively. The efficacy of three serotonin antagonists was comparable during the chemotherapy period (5 patients with nausea and/or emesis control failure in the granisetron group, 2 in the tropisetron group and 4 in the ondansetron group,p = 0.40). When evaluating the whole period of observation, the antiemetic response to G and T was significantly better than to O, nausea and/or emesis control failure having occurred in 7 (47%) patients treated with G, 5 (33%) patients treated with T, and 12 (80%) patients treated with O, p = 0.03. The results concerning emesis control failures were similar, G 4 (27%), T 1 (7%), O 7 (47%), p = 0.04. Headache was the only frequent side effect of serotonin antagonists (30% incidence). All three serotonin antagonists sufficiently controlled nausea and vomiting during high-dose chemotherapy (BEAM) administration in 67-87% of patients. In comparison with ondansetron, both tropisetron and granisetron proved to be more effective after ASCT, when emetogenic factors other than chemotherapy alone participated.