Vascular access quality monitoring
Language English Country Belgium Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
- MeSH
- Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical adverse effects standards MeSH
- Renal Dialysis instrumentation standards MeSH
- Risk Assessment methods MeSH
- Blood Pressure MeSH
- Laser-Doppler Flowmetry MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Monitoring, Physiologic methods standards MeSH
- Graft Occlusion, Vascular MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Blood Flow Velocity MeSH
- Equipment Failure MeSH
- Quality Indicators, Health Care MeSH
- Quality Assurance, Health Care methods standards MeSH
- Catheters, Indwelling adverse effects standards MeSH
- Health Services Needs and Demand MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
Access dysfunction presents a risk for haemodialysis patients and is costly for health care providers. Regular vascular access quality (VAQ) monitoring enables the detection of adverse access conditions early allowing timely interventions, which will presumably be less invasive, more successful and cheaper. This paper reviews all currently used assessment parameters: dynamic and static pressures, recirculation and blood flow through the access--and analyses pros and cons of each of them. Based on this overview it is concluded that access flow monitoring should be the method of choice, possibly combined with monitoring of another parameter to further enlarge diagnostic possibilities of the monitoring. The VAQ monitoring system developed and used currently in the author's dialysis centre is briefly described as an example. The issue of access flow related to haemodynamics is briefly mentioned. With the introduction of any VAQ monitoring system, one has to acknowledge a change in structure of interventions and that the demand for surgical procedures decreases with a concurrent increase in percutaneous interventions.
References provided by Crossref.org