A prospective comparison of bladder versus enteric drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
PubMed
15251375
DOI
10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.04.074
PII: S0041134504005068
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Anticoagulants therapeutic use MeSH
- Antilymphocyte Serum therapeutic use MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Drainage methods MeSH
- Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Urinary Bladder * MeSH
- Pancreas blood supply MeSH
- Graft Survival physiology MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Pancreas Transplantation methods physiology MeSH
- Thrombosis prevention & control MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Anticoagulants MeSH
- Antilymphocyte Serum MeSH
- Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight MeSH
In previous years, the number of pancreas transplants has increased significantly. Debate continues over the optimum technique for exocrine drainage. Enteric drainage (ED) has recently been increasingly popular owing to the long-term complications of bladder drainage (BD). We prospectively evaluated 40 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients undergoing either bladder (n = 20) or enteric (n = 20) drainage. After simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation 1-year patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 95%, 95%, 85% for the BD group, and 90%, 85%, 85%, for the ED group. Surgical complications were not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of acute rejection, major infections and cytomegalovirus disease were also similar. The length of the initial hospital stay was likewise comparable. However, the BD group was characterized by a slight increase in the number of urologic complications, metabolic acidosis, and dehydration. Our results suggest excellent patient and graft survival irrespective of the drainage technique.
References provided by Crossref.org
First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations