Characterization of Candida albicans colony morphological mutants and their hybrids by means of RAPD-PCR, isoenzyme analysis and pathogenicity analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
15702540
DOI
10.1007/bf02931528
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Candida albicans enzymologie genetika růst a vývoj patogenita MeSH
- DNA fungální genetika MeSH
- fenotyp MeSH
- geny hub MeSH
- hybridizace genetická MeSH
- izoenzymy genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- mutace * MeSH
- myši MeSH
- sekvence nukleotidů MeSH
- technika náhodné amplifikace polymorfní DNA MeSH
- virulence genetika MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- myši MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- DNA fungální MeSH
- izoenzymy MeSH
A wild-type strain of Candida albicans (S1, ATCC 10261) was used to obtain stable auxotrophic colony morphological mutants (mutant M5 producing only true hyphae and mutant M2 containing 90 % blastospores and 10 % pseudohyphae) by induced mutagenesis. A hybrid was produced by somatic hybridization between these 2 mutants. Out of the isolated 10 clones, 2 stable hybrid clones were chosen and characterized: clone VI. 1M produced rough colonies containing a new, extended cell type (never observed in natural isolates), exhibited unipolar budding, did not form a germ tube, and possessed 12 chromosomal bands. All other features (antifungal and stress sensitivity, adhesion ability, pathogenicity, and isoenzyme and RAPD patterns) were similar to those of mycelial mutant M5. In contrast, the characteristics of clone VI.9S were similar to those of morphological mutant M2.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Cytobios. 1988;55(222-223):171-84 PubMed
Trends Microbiol. 2001 Dec;9(12):591-6 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003;48(2):203-9 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1999 Jul;67(7):3649-52 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1992 Oct;138(10):2243-51 PubMed
Arch Oral Biol. 1998 Dec;43(12):999-1007 PubMed
Genetics. 2001 Jun;158(2):919-24 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(2):179-81 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995 Feb 15;126(2):177-80 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1988 Aug;56(8):1987-93 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jun;38(6):2317-23 PubMed
Microbiol Rev. 1990 Sep;54(3):226-41 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Dec 25;18(24):7213-8 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1985 Nov;50(2):541-4 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1989 Feb;135(Pt 2):425-34 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1990 Mar;172(3):1276-83 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994 Jan 1;115(1):77-82 PubMed
J Med Vet Mycol. 1994;32(3):151-62 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1990 May;172(5):2384-91 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1990 Dec;136(12):2433-42 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1991 Sep;59(9):3297-300 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1990 Jul;58(7):2228-36 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996 Apr 1;137(2-3):269-73 PubMed
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 May;77(5):535-9 PubMed
Trends Microbiol. 2001 Jul;9(7):327-35 PubMed
J Infect. 1998 Jan;36(1):57-62 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3249-54 PubMed
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1997 Oct;72(3):167-73 PubMed
Crit Rev Microbiol. 1987;15(1):79-85 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 25;18(22):6531-5 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1994 Feb;176(3):756-63 PubMed
Trends Microbiol. 1998 Mar;6(3):92-4 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1986 Jan;165(1):61-5 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(2):105-12 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Feb;31(2):215-20 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1998 Jun;66(6):2713-21 PubMed
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Nov;41(3):113-9 PubMed
J Dent. 1998 Sep;26(7):577-83 PubMed
APMIS. 1998 Nov;106(11):1049-55 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1999 Dec;67(12):6637-42 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1988 Jun;134(6):1587-95 PubMed
Acta Biol Hung. 2001;52(2-3):289-98 PubMed
Yeast. 1996 Dec;12(16):1677-702 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1991 Oct;173(20):6586-96 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999 Jul 15;176(2):311-9 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 1999 Feb;48(2):167-172 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1982 Jan;128(1):123-8 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 1994 Dec;140 ( Pt 12):3319-28 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 1994 Jun;40(6):416-23 PubMed
Arch Oral Biol. 1980;25(8-9):603-9 PubMed