Characterization of Candida albicans colony-morphology mutants and their hybrids
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
12800504
DOI
10.1007/bf02930957
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Candida albicans genetika růst a vývoj MeSH
- DNA fungální genetika MeSH
- křížení genetické MeSH
- kultivační média MeSH
- methylnitronitrosoguanidin farmakologie MeSH
- mikroskopie elektronová rastrovací MeSH
- mutace * MeSH
- polyethylenglykoly farmakologie MeSH
- průtoková cytometrie MeSH
- testy genetické komplementace MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- DNA fungální MeSH
- kultivační média MeSH
- methylnitronitrosoguanidin MeSH
- polyethylenglykoly MeSH
The collection wild-type strain of Candida albicans was used to obtain auxotrophic and colony-morphology mutants by 'nitrosoguanidine' treatment. Intraspecific protoplast fusion induced by Ca(2+)-poly(ethyleneglycol) was carried out in various pairings between the auxotrophic strain producing smooth colonies and containing blastospores and the colony-morphology mutants containing a mixture of blastospores and pseudohyphae or only hyphae. Hybrids exhibiting full or partial complementation were obtained when mutants producing smooth colonies and colony-morphology variants of different origins were fused. The mutation responsible for the colony-morphology character (if various types of colony morphomutants were crossed) proved to be recessive or semidominant. Representative hybrids exhibited elevated DNA contents as measured by flow cytometry. To illustrate various cell types, and especially the intermediate one (never observed in natural isolates), a preparation method was further developed for scanning electron microscopic studies.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992 Apr;5(2):183-203 PubMed
Yeast. 1996 Dec;12(16):1677-702 PubMed
Med Mycol. 2000;38 Suppl 1:79-86 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1971 Apr;106(1):276-80 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1982 Jan;128(1):123-8 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 1994 Jun;40(6):416-23 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1981 Jun;146(3):833-40 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(2):179-81 PubMed
EMBO J. 1997 Apr 15;16(8):1982-91 PubMed
Crit Rev Microbiol. 1985;12(3):223-70 PubMed
Arch Microbiol. 1977 Nov 18;115(2):143-9 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1973 Jul;115(1):341-8 PubMed
Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung. 1978;25(3):209-12 PubMed
J Immunol Methods. 2001 Nov 1;257(1-2):185-202 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2001;46(5):443-6 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1987 Jan;169(1):189-97 PubMed
J Infect. 1998 Jan;36(1):57-62 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1991 Oct;173(20):6586-96 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 1999 Feb;48(2):167-72 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):13223-8 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(2):105-12 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1986 Jan;165(1):61-5 PubMed
Microbiol Rev. 1990 Sep;54(3):226-41 PubMed
Nature. 1977 Aug 11;268(5620):524-5 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1970 Nov;104(2):902-9 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1988 Jun;134(6):1587-95 PubMed
Crit Rev Microbiol. 1987;15(1):79-85 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(6):727-31 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1993 Nov;175(22):7189-99 PubMed
Trends Microbiol. 2001 Jul;9(7):327-35 PubMed
Curr Genet. 1990 Apr;17(4):293-6 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2001;46(5):453-7 PubMed
Acta Biol Hung. 2001;52(2-3):289-98 PubMed
Mol Gen Genet. 1985;200(1):162-8 PubMed
Science. 1997 Jul 4;277(5322):105-9 PubMed
Arch Microbiol. 1981 Mar;129(1):1-8 PubMed