Biofilm detection and the clinical significance of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
15702552
DOI
10.1007/bf02931540
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Genes, Bacterial MeSH
- Bacteremia microbiology MeSH
- Biofilms * growth & development MeSH
- Skin microbiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Operon MeSH
- Staphylococcal Infections microbiology MeSH
- Staphylococcus epidermidis genetics isolation & purification pathogenicity physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
The ability of Staphylococcus epidermidis to produce biofilm was compared in 147 clinically significant strains repeatedly isolated from blood cultures of patients with bloodstream infection and in 147 strains isolated from skin. The strains were examined for the presence of ica operone, for the ability to form biofilm by Christensen's test-tube method and for the production of slime by Congo Red agar method. The ica operone was found in 92 (62.6 %) blood isolates and in 44 (29.9) isolates from skin. Christensen's test-tube method was positive in 79 (53.7) and 33 (22.4), Congo Red agar method in 64 (43.5) and 31 (21.1) of blood and skin isolates, respectively. All three methods were more frequently positive in clinically significant isolates from blood than in strains isolated from skin. The detection of ica operone and the Christensen's test-tube method showed better correlation with the clinical significance than the Congo Red agar method.
See more in PubMed
Lancet. 1998 Mar 21;351(9106):893-8 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Infect. 1998 Feb;4(12):689-694 PubMed
Microbiology. 2000 Mar;146 ( Pt 3):547-9 PubMed
Science. 1999 May 21;284(5418):1318-22 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Feb;38(2):877-80 PubMed
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Nov;12(11):866-8 PubMed
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2000 Jun;45(3):178-82 PubMed
Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 1993 Jun;42(2):51-3 PubMed
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;36(2):139-41 PubMed
J Clin Pathol. 1989 Aug;42(8):872-4 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Apr;45(4):999-1007 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1982 Jul;37(1):318-26 PubMed
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2002 Oct;191(2):101-6 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Feb;9(2):114-9 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Dec;34(12):2888-93 PubMed
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Dec;18(12):843-6 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1996 Jan;178(1):175-83 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 2001 Jul;50(7):582-7 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jan;28(1):76-82 PubMed
Following the mechanisms of bacteriostatic versus bactericidal action using Raman spectroscopy
Effect of pH on production of virulence factors by biofilm cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa