Various stages in the life cycle of syrphid flies (Eristalis tenax; Diptera: Syrphidae) as potential mechanical vectors of pathogens causing mycobacterial infections in pig herds
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
16821726
DOI
10.1007/bf02932171
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Diptera mikrobiologie MeSH
- hmyz - vektory mikrobiologie MeSH
- larva mikrobiologie MeSH
- Mycobacterium avium izolace a purifikace patogenita MeSH
- Mycobacterium izolace a purifikace MeSH
- mykobakteriózy mikrobiologie veterinární MeSH
- nemoci prasat mikrobiologie MeSH
- netuberkulózní mykobakterie izolace a purifikace MeSH
- rozdělení chí kvadrát MeSH
- Sus scrofa mikrobiologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
We defined the role of the syrphid fly Eristalis tenax in the survival and transmission of mycobacteria in pigs. The conditionally pathogenic mycobacterial (CPM) species Mycobacterium chelonae was isolated from 10 % of liquid dung samples, and both M. chelonae and another CPM species M. fortuitum were isolated from 7 (78 %) of the examined E. tenax larvae collected from the same location. Mycobacteriosis of the lymph nodes of pigs from 3 infected farms was caused by M. avium subsp. avium, M. avium subsp. hominissuis, and M. fortuitum. M. avium subsp. avium and M. avium subsp. hominissuis of identical genotype and serotypes and M. fortuitum were isolated from 7 (1.9 %) larvae, 2 (7.4 %) puparia, and one (1.6 %) imago. The count of colony forming units isolated from larval skin covering (pouch) was higher (p < or = 0.01) than that isolated from the internal organs of larvae. These results showed the potential for E. tenax larvae to spread mycobacteria throughout pig herds and the surrounding environment.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Aug 6;101(4):225-34 PubMed
Vet Rec. 2001 Mar 3;148(9):261-3 PubMed
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1969;211(1):58-69 PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Sep 8;102(3-4):227-36 PubMed
Med Vet Entomol. 2004 Jun;18(2):116-22 PubMed
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998 Mar;2(3):242-51 PubMed
Prax Pneumol. 1976 Jun;30(6):374-7 PubMed
Med Vet Entomol. 2003 Jun;17(2):145-50 PubMed
Rinsho Byori. 1990 Nov;38(11):1247-53 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Mar;43(3):1261-8 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):304-7 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Sep;30(9):2366-72 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 May;70(5):2989-3004 PubMed
Nord Vet Med. 1977 Jun;29(6):267-70 PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Sep 8;102(3-4):247-55 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Nov;14(5):587-8 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Oct;40(10):3712-9 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2000;45(2):147-52 PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2003 Feb 25;91(4):325-38 PubMed
Med Vet Entomol. 2001 Jun;15(2):208-11 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 Sep;52(Pt 5):1505-1518 PubMed
Vet Res. 1997 Sep-Oct;28(5):439-47 PubMed
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1979 Jun;244(1):50-7 PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2000 Dec 20;77(3-4):309-24 PubMed
