The large-scale change of Czech society since 1989 has involved the democratic transformation of the health system. To empower the patient was one important goal of the healthcare reform launched immediately after the Velvet Revolution. The process has been enhanced by the accession of the Czech Republic to the European Union and the adoption of important European conventions regulating the area. The concept of informed consent and a culture of negotiation are being inserted into a traditionally paternalistic culture. Our article describes the current situation on the issue of the communication of information on state of health and treatment, and on the question of the participation of the patient in decisions on treatment. We present empirical results of a public opinion survey on this issue. The results show a still prevailing submissive attitude towards the physicians, despite the fact that the concept of informed consent has become more and more publicly familiar (42% of respondents gave the completely correct answer regarding informed consent). The impact of age, education and sex on answers to the questionnaire was analysed. Men, younger and more educated respondents were more likely to show the autonomous attitude, whereas women, older and less educated people tended to show the traditional submissive attitude. Further, our article raises the question of the cultural and historical background within which the current ethically and legally binding norms (products of western democracies, in fact) are interpreted. The question is how far cultural modifications are tolerable in the practical implementation of universal ethical constructs (informed consent).

Institute for Medical Ethics and Nursing 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Haskovcova H.Práva pacientů (The rights of patients). Havířov: Nakladatelství A, Krtilové 1996167–168.

Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine. Oviedo: Council of Europe, 1997, http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm (accessed 16 Feb 2007) PubMed

Elger B S, Harding T W. Should cancer patients be informed about their diagnosis and prognosis? Future doctors and lawyers differ. J Med Ethics 200228258–265. PubMed PMC

Oken D. What to tell cancer patients. A study of medical attitudes. JAMA 19611751120–1128. PubMed

Fried T R, Stein M D, O'Sullivan P S.et al Limits of patient autonomy. Physician attitudes and practices regarding life‐sustaining treatments and euthanasia. Arch Intern Med 1993153722–728. PubMed

Krizova E. Czech physicians remain hesitant communicators. Bull Med Ethics 200318713–15.

Griffith J. The social working of legal rules. J Legal Pluralism 2003481–84.

Beauchamp T L, Childress J F.Principles of medical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 198974–82.

Immacolato M. Informed consent in Italy: a Mediterranean country towards an autonomy‐based model. J Int Bioethique 200415187–196. PubMed

McCabe M, Morgan F, Curley H.et al The informed consent process in a cross‐cultural setting: is the process achieving the intended results? Ethn Dis 200515300–304. PubMed

Innovative communication approaches for initializing pediatric palliative care: perspectives of family caregivers and treating specialists

Limited family members/staff communication in intensive care units in the Czech and Slovak Republics considerably increases anxiety in patients' relatives--the DEPRESS study