• This record comes from PubMed

Assaying the antioxidant and radical scavenging properties of aliphatic mono- and di-N-oxides in superoxide dismutase-deficient yeast and in a chemiluminescence test

. 2007 ; 52 (1) : 45-51.

Language English Country United States Media print

Document type Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The antioxidative action of amphiphilic mono-(alkanoylamino) ethyldimethylamine-N-oxides (EDA), di-N-oxides 1,1-bis {[2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl]amido}alkane-di-N-oxides (MEDA) and 1,1-bis {[3-(N,N-dimethylamino)propyl]amido}alkane-di-N-oxides (MPDA) with a 12- and 14-membered acyl chain against tert-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP)-produced peroxyl and paraquat (PQ)-generated superoxide radicals was determined in superoxide dismutase-deficient mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and, in parallel, in a chemical assay based on chemiluminescence changes caused in a luminol system by peroxyl radicals generated from the azo-compound 2,2'-azobis(2-amidinopropane dihydrochloride) (AAPH). At 30 micromol/L, the shorter-chain compounds did not affect strain survival while longer-chain ones, in some cases, lowered the survival of sod2 and sod1 sod2 cells. Whether nontoxic or medium-toxic, all N-oxides protected the sod strains against the toxic effect of PQ and TBHP, the protection being stronger with the di-N-oxides. The survival was lowered only by 14-MPDA in the TBHP-exposed sod2 mutant. Membrane lipids isolated from all strains were protected against TBHP-induced peroxidation by both mono- and di-N-oxides, the protection being dependent on the alkyl chain length. Mono-N-oxides were again less active than di-N-oxides with the same alkyl chains, the antiperoxidative activity being also dependent on lipids isolated from the individual mutants. In the chemiluminescence assay, the IC50 value of the N-oxides for scavenging of radicals generated from AAPH generally decreased (i.e. the scavenging efficiency increased) with increasing chain length and was the highest in MEDA.

See more in PubMed

Environ Sci Technol. 1988 Jan 1;22(1):77-82 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(2):145-51 PubMed

Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2001 Jul;226(7):620-1 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1989 Jul 5;264(19):11131-5 PubMed

FASEB J. 2000 Jun;14(9):1215-23 PubMed

Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2001;6(1):71-81 PubMed

Anticancer Res. 2000 Jul-Aug;20(4):2421-6 PubMed

Methods Enzymol. 1994;234:580-9 PubMed

Biochem Pharmacol. 2005 May 1;69(9):1351-61 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003;48(6):754-60 PubMed

Free Radic Res. 2005 Mar;39(3):325-36 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(2):99-107 PubMed

Free Radic Res. 2006 May;40(5):485-94 PubMed

Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 2005 Jul-Aug;60(7-8):567-71 PubMed

Indian J Exp Biol. 2006 Feb;44(2):93-114 PubMed

J Am Chem Soc. 2006 Jan 11;128(1):245-9 PubMed

Methods Enzymol. 1988;157:513-28 PubMed

Chem Phys Lipids. 1996 Jan 25;79(1):55-63 PubMed

J Phys Chem A. 2006 Mar 16;110(10):3679-85 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1987 Dec 15;262(35):16871-9 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...