Multiplex PCR detection of the antibiotic resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from auricular infections
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky farmakologie MeSH
- bakteriální léková rezistence * MeSH
- bakteriální proteiny genetika metabolismus MeSH
- erythromycin farmakologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- membránové proteiny genetika metabolismus MeSH
- methyltransferasy genetika metabolismus MeSH
- oxacilin farmakologie MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce metody MeSH
- proteiny vázající penicilin MeSH
- stafylokokové infekce mikrobiologie MeSH
- Staphylococcus aureus účinky léků genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- ušní boltec mikrobiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antibakteriální látky MeSH
- bakteriální proteiny MeSH
- ErmA protein, Bacteria MeSH Prohlížeč
- erythromycin MeSH
- mecA protein, Staphylococcus aureus MeSH Prohlížeč
- MefA protein, Streptococcus MeSH Prohlížeč
- membránové proteiny MeSH
- methyltransferasy MeSH
- oxacilin MeSH
- proteiny vázající penicilin MeSH
Thirty-five Staphylococcus aureus strains from auricular infections were isolated. The identification of strains was confirmed by Api ID 32 Staph strips, the antibiotic susceptibility test was performed using ATB Staph kit. PCR assay was used to detect the oxacillin resistance gene (mecA) and the erythromycin genes (ermA, ermB, ermC, msrA and mef). The susceptibility profile of all strains revealed a low resistance level to oxacillin and erythromycin. The PCR results show that 60 % of the strains are mecA positive. The frequency of erythromycin genes was: ermA (+) 22.8 %, ermB (+) 45.7, ermC (+) 17.1, msrA (+) 28.6. The mef gene was not detected in any strain. No correlations between genotypic and phenotypic methods for the determination of oxacillin and erythromycin resistance was found. However, multiplex PCR technique was shown to be a fast, practical and economic technique for the detection of methicillin-and erythromycin-resistant staphylococci.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Mar;30(3):205-14 PubMed
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2004 Apr;57(2):74-7 PubMed
J Hosp Infect. 2002 May;51(1):33-42 PubMed
Gene. 1995 Feb 3;153(1):93-8 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2007;52(3):281-5 PubMed
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Jul;43(3):225-32 PubMed
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;16(1):12-7 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 May;43(5):1062-6 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Mar;39(3):577-85 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 1990 Jul;4(7):1207-14 PubMed
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Apr;33(4):283-97 PubMed
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Feb;31(2):211-7 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Sep;41(9):4089-94 PubMed
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1998 Apr;46(4):227-34 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Oct;14(4):836-71, table of contents PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(3):236-8 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Nov;40(11):2562-6 PubMed
Arch Med Res. 2006 Nov;37(8):953-60 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Mar;40(3):774-8 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Oct;10(4):781-91 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1768-72 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2007;52(6):593-9 PubMed
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Feb 15;34(4):482-92 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Feb;44(2):231-8 PubMed
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Mar;49(3):489-95 PubMed
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Sep;44(3):351-8 PubMed
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Sep;26(3):213-8 PubMed