The importance of rheological parameters in the therapy of microcirculatory disorders
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
19363239
DOI
10.3233/ch-2009-1184
PII: D252816064085570
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- hyperlipidemie terapie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- makulární degenerace krev terapie MeSH
- mikrocirkulace fyziologie MeSH
- náhlá nedoslýchavost krev terapie MeSH
- noha (od hlezna dolů) krevní zásobení patofyziologie MeSH
- obnova funkce MeSH
- onemocnění periferních cév krev terapie MeSH
- plazmaferéza * MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vředy na noze (od hlezna dolů) terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
Rheological conditions basically influence tissue perfusion, oxygen and nutrient supply, tissue regeneration and in its consequence the course of pathological processes, especially in microcirculation and partially even in macrocirculation. Haemorheotherapy has shown to be successful in several indications (critical disorders in microcirculation) when other methods of therapy have failed. In this study we describe the changes of effectivity indicators in haemorheopheresis treatment and their clinical importance in cases of eye microcirculation, statoacoustic apparatus and disorders of the lower extremities. We treated with haemorheopheresis (separator Cobe.Spetra + Evaflux filter) 24 patients (16 patients with age related macular degeneration, 5 with critical peripheral arterial foot disease, and 3 with acute hearing loss). After the procedures alpha2-macroglobulin decreases by about 58%, fibrinogen by about 69%, IgM by about 61%, LDL-cholesterol by about 77%, apolipoprotein B by about 76% and lipoprotein(a) by about 63%. It corresponds with a decrease in blood and plasma viscosity and clinical improvement in the observed patients, i.e. visual improvement, acceleration of tissue defect healing and improvement in hearing. We noticed 7.1% clinically insignificant side-effects. The method of haemorheopheresis was safe. It led to improvement in patients' clinical condition in the above mentioned indications when other methods of treatment failed.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org