The importance of rheological parameters in the therapy of microcirculatory disorders
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
19363239
DOI
10.3233/ch-2009-1184
PII: D252816064085570
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Hyperlipidemias therapy MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Macular Degeneration blood therapy MeSH
- Microcirculation physiology MeSH
- Hearing Loss, Sudden blood therapy MeSH
- Foot blood supply physiopathology MeSH
- Recovery of Function MeSH
- Peripheral Vascular Diseases blood therapy MeSH
- Plasmapheresis * MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Foot Ulcer therapy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
Rheological conditions basically influence tissue perfusion, oxygen and nutrient supply, tissue regeneration and in its consequence the course of pathological processes, especially in microcirculation and partially even in macrocirculation. Haemorheotherapy has shown to be successful in several indications (critical disorders in microcirculation) when other methods of therapy have failed. In this study we describe the changes of effectivity indicators in haemorheopheresis treatment and their clinical importance in cases of eye microcirculation, statoacoustic apparatus and disorders of the lower extremities. We treated with haemorheopheresis (separator Cobe.Spetra + Evaflux filter) 24 patients (16 patients with age related macular degeneration, 5 with critical peripheral arterial foot disease, and 3 with acute hearing loss). After the procedures alpha2-macroglobulin decreases by about 58%, fibrinogen by about 69%, IgM by about 61%, LDL-cholesterol by about 77%, apolipoprotein B by about 76% and lipoprotein(a) by about 63%. It corresponds with a decrease in blood and plasma viscosity and clinical improvement in the observed patients, i.e. visual improvement, acceleration of tissue defect healing and improvement in hearing. We noticed 7.1% clinically insignificant side-effects. The method of haemorheopheresis was safe. It led to improvement in patients' clinical condition in the above mentioned indications when other methods of treatment failed.
References provided by Crossref.org