Efficacy and safety of piascledine 300 versus chondroitin sulfate in a 6 months treatment plus 2 months observation in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- adherence pacienta MeSH
- artróza kolenních kloubů farmakoterapie MeSH
- chondroitinsulfáty škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- fixní kombinace léků MeSH
- fytosteroly škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- rostlinné extrakty škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- vitamin E škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- chondroitinsulfáty MeSH
- fixní kombinace léků MeSH
- fytosteroly MeSH
- piascledine MeSH Prohlížeč
- rostlinné extrakty MeSH
- vitamin E MeSH
To investigate that a 6-month treatment with avocado soybean unsaponifiable (Piascledine 300 mg) once daily is as effective as with chondroitin sulfate 400 mg three times daily in femorotibial gonarthrosis, and also the carry-over effect for two more months is comparable. Patients were randomized (1:1) to the treatment groups. They received for 6 months 3 capsules chondroitin sulfate per day or one capsule of avocado soybean unsaponifiable (ASU) in a double-dummy technique. A 2-month post-treatment period followed to determine the carry-over effect. Primary efficacy criterion was the change of the WOMAC-index from study begin to end of treatment. Secondary criteria were the changes in Lequesne-index, pain on active movement and at rest, global assessment of efficacy. Three hundred sixty-four patients have been taken up into the trial. Three hundred sixty one patients were eligible for evaluation. One hundred eighty three received ASU 300 mg once daily, one hundred seventy eight chondroitin sulfate three times daily. The WOMAC-index decreased in both groups for approx. 50% to the end of therapy. During the post-treatment observation there was a further slight improvement. There was no statistical significant difference between the treatment groups during the entire observation. All other observed parameters showed the same pattern. The daily intake of rescue medication was reduced continuously. Overall efficacy has been rated excellent and good in more than 80% of the patients in both groups. Both drugs were safe and well tolerated. The first direct comparison between avocado soybean unsaponifiable 300 mg once daily and chondroitin sulfate three times daily reveiled no difference in efficacy or safety aspects between 1 capsule ASU 300 mg per day and 3 capsules chondroitin sulfate per day. It can be assumed that the once daily intake of ASU will lead to a better compliance in routine therapy.
Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Jul;29(7):819-20 PubMed
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 Jan;7(1):95-109 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1997 Apr;24(4):799-802 PubMed
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Mar;43(3):381-4 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jan;42(1):148-56 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039-49 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Dec;62(12):1145-55 PubMed
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Dec 16;9:165 PubMed
Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Sep;22(3):181-8 PubMed
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Apr;16(4):399-408 PubMed
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1991 Apr;58(4):241-5 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 2006 Aug;33(8):1668-78 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 2000 Jan;27(1):205-11 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1997 Feb;24(2):358-64 PubMed
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1996 Dec;4(4):217-43 PubMed
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Feb;16(2):137-62 PubMed
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1989 Feb;56(2):207-11 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Feb;47(1):50-8 PubMed
Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1987;65:85-9 PubMed
Scand J Rheumatol. 2001;30(4):242-7 PubMed
Rev Rhum Ed Fr. 1994 Feb;61(2):75-9 PubMed
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Mar;16(3):373-84 PubMed
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14;162(18):2113-23 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 May;54(5):1529-35 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 1996 Aug;55(8):552-7 PubMed
Clin Rheumatol. 1998;17(1):31-9 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Dec;59(12):936-44 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1996 Aug;23(8):1385-91 PubMed
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(2):R41 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 2003 Aug;30(8):1825-34 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502 PubMed
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25;166(17):1899-906 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Jan;41(1):81-91 PubMed
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Feb;11(2):133-40 PubMed
Phys Ther. 2007 Dec;87(12):1716-27 PubMed
Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):29-33 PubMed
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008 Jul-Aug;26(4):554-60 PubMed
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 17;146(8):580-90 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 2001 Jan;28(1):173-81 PubMed
Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1997 Dec;64(12):825-34 PubMed