• This record comes from PubMed

Left atrial flow propagation velocity: a new approach for assessment of left atrial reservoir function

. 2011 Jan ; 27 (1) : 75-82. [epub] 20100623

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

To assess the feasibility of left atrial flow propagation velocity (LAFPV) measurement and to evaluate the influence of preload alterations on this new parameter of left atrial (LA) reservoir function as compared to conventional echocardiographic indices. 30 healthy volunteers (26 ± 5 years, 20 males) underwent echocardiographic examination at rest, during passive leg lifting and after sublingual administration of nitroglycerine with subsequent Valsalva maneuver. LA reservoir function was assessed by conventional indices including LA expansion index, peak velocity and velocity-time integral of pulmonary venous systolic flow. As well, LAFPV was measured by color M-mode in an apical 4-chamber view as the slope of the transatrial flow wave during LA reservoir phase. LAFPV measurement was feasible in 25 subjects (83%). All conventional parameters of LA reservoir function were significantly altered from resting values by both load-modifying conditions. However, LAPFV was not significantly altered by such maneuvers (228 ± 28 cm s⁻¹ at rest vs. 238 ± 3 cm s⁻¹ during leg lifting, P = NS, vs. 218 ± 38 cm s(-1) after nitroglycerin with Valsalva maneuver, P = NS vs. rest, P < 0.01 vs. leg lifting). LAFPV can be measured in a majority of subjects and represents a new, less load-dependent index of LA reservoir function that may more appropriately reflect LA compliance.

See more in PubMed

Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jun 1;101(11):1626-9 PubMed

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 Apr;17(4):353-60 PubMed

Eur Heart J. 2001 Jan;22(1):22-36 PubMed

Circ Res. 1988 Mar;62(3):543-53 PubMed

Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006 Mar;7(2):79-108 PubMed

Anesthesiology. 2003 Apr;98(4):975-94 PubMed

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Sep;18(9):991-7 PubMed

Med Sci Monit. 2000 Jul-Aug;6(4):827-39 PubMed

Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Mar;10(2):256-9 PubMed

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997 Apr;10(3):271-92 PubMed

Circulation. 1992 Aug;86(2):651-9 PubMed

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Sep 15;82(6):756-61 PubMed

Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006 Jun;7(3):199-208 PubMed

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Nov 15;30(6):1562-74 PubMed

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999 Feb;12(2):129-37 PubMed

Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Aug;10(6):753-9 PubMed

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Nov 1;36(5):1664-9 PubMed

Circulation. 1999 Jul 27;100(4):427-36 PubMed

Eur J Echocardiogr. 2003 Jun;4(2):92-100 PubMed

Echocardiography. 1999 Jan;16(1):117-125 PubMed

Am J Cardiol. 1969 Apr;23(4):556-67 PubMed

Circ Res. 1974 Jul;35(1):39-43 PubMed

Circulation. 1992 Oct;86(4):1317-22 PubMed

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Aug;20(2):420-32 PubMed

Am Heart J. 1994 Aug;128(2):308-15 PubMed

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999 Aug;12(8):618-28 PubMed

Int J Cardiol. 1994 Dec;47(2):139-43 PubMed

Clin Cardiol. 1994 May;17(5):258-62 PubMed

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Mar;22(3):299-305 PubMed

Am J Cardiol. 1991 Oct 15;68(10):1049-54 PubMed

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jan;37(1):278-85 PubMed

Heart. 2007 Nov;93(11):1461-70 PubMed

Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1376-83 PubMed

Echocardiography. 2009 Aug;26(7):772-8 PubMed

Am J Cardiol. 1998 May 1;81(9):1138-43 PubMed

Hypertension. 1986 Sep;8(9):779-85 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...