Correct information on genome size is important in many areas of research. For a long time, scientists have been struggling to understand the reason for the huge variation in eukaryotic genome size and its biological significance. More recently, the knowledge on genome size has become important to structure genome sequencing projects as their scale and cost depend on genome size. Despite the fact that the first estimates of genome size in eukaryotes were made more than 50 years ago, we are still not quite sure about the exact genome size in practically all animal and plant species. Moreover, different estimates continue to be published for the same species. These discrepancies compromise data comparison and interpretation and point to methodological problems, which include standardization. This article assesses the current state of DNA reference standards for flow cytometry and the issues related to their calibration.

Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cytometry Institute of Experimental Botany Sokolovská 6 CZ 77200 Olomouc Czech Republic

References provided by Crossref.org

New estimates of genome size in Orthoptera and their evolutionary implications

Reference standards for flow cytometric estimation of absolute nuclear DNA content in plants

Prospects of telomere-to-telomere assembly in barley: Analysis of sequence gaps in the MorexV3 reference genome

Unravelling hybridization in Phytophthora using phylogenomics and genome size estimation

One Major Challenge of Sequencing Large Plant Genomes Is to Know How Big They Really Are

New chromosome counts and genome size estimates for 28 species of Taraxacum sect. Taraxacum

Patterns of Genetic Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium in a Large Collection of Pea Germplasm

Nutrient reserves may allow for genome size increase: evidence from comparison of geophytes and their sister non-geophytic relatives

Evolution of genome size in Carex (Cyperaceae) in relation to chromosome number and genomic base composition

Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology?