Advances in fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
PubMed
20645699
DOI
10.1586/era.10.61
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant MeSH
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy MeSH
- Diagnostic Imaging MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Gynecologic Surgical Procedures methods MeSH
- Hysterectomy adverse effects methods MeSH
- Colposcopy MeSH
- Combined Modality Therapy MeSH
- Laparoscopy methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local prevention & control MeSH
- Lymphatic Metastasis MeSH
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms drug therapy surgery MeSH
- Postoperative Complications prevention & control MeSH
- Postoperative Care MeSH
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell secondary surgery MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Pregnancy Rate MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Infertility, Female etiology prevention & control MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
This article reviews the literature on fertility-sparing surgery in early cervical cancer. The article evaluates selection criteria, preoperative management and the most frequent surgical procedures used for preservation of fertility in cervical cancer. The article also analyzes oncological, fertility and pregnancy results. Oncological outcomes are not statistically different among single groups (vaginal radical trachelectomy, abdominal radical trachelectomy, simple trachelectomy or cone with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy). Oncological results after fertility-sparing procedures in women with tumors smaller than 2 cm are comparable with women with the same risk factors after radical hysterectomy. Pregnancy following fertility-sparing surgery is associated with a variety of adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially second-trimester loss and preterm delivery. Less radical procedures (simple trachelectomy or cone with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy) show statistically significant better pregnancy results. The pregnancy rate after abdominal radical trachelectomy was dramatically lower than in women treated with other types of fertility-sparing surgery. In the future, it will be necessary to optimize the technique and management of fertility-sparing surgery in order to attain good oncological results. Pregnancy outcomes should be given high priority. Fertility-sparing surgery is valuable for women who want to preserve their reproductive capability.
References provided by Crossref.org