Inhibition of SAH-hydrolase activity during seed germination leads to deregulation of flowering genes and altered flower morphology in tobacco
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- adenin analogy a deriváty toxicita MeSH
- adenosylhomocysteinasa antagonisté a inhibitory metabolismus MeSH
- DNA primery genetika MeSH
- epigeneze genetická účinky léků fyziologie MeSH
- klíčení účinky léků fyziologie MeSH
- komplementární DNA genetika MeSH
- květy anatomie a histologie fyziologie MeSH
- metylace DNA MeSH
- neparametrická statistika MeSH
- pyl fyziologie MeSH
- regulace genové exprese u rostlin účinky léků genetika fyziologie MeSH
- rostlinné proteiny metabolismus MeSH
- Southernův blotting MeSH
- tabák enzymologie fyziologie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- 9-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)adenine MeSH Prohlížeč
- adenin MeSH
- adenosylhomocysteinasa MeSH
- DNA primery MeSH
- GLO protein, Nicotiana tabacum MeSH Prohlížeč
- komplementární DNA MeSH
- rostlinné proteiny MeSH
Developmental processes are closely connected to certain states of epigenetic information which, among others, rely on methylation of chromatin. S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) are key cofactors of enzymes catalyzing DNA and histone methylation. To study the consequences of altered SAH/SAM levels on plant development we applied 9-(S)-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)-adenine (DHPA), an inhibitor of SAH-hydrolase, on tobacco seeds during a short phase of germination period (6 days). The transient drug treatment induced: (1) dosage-dependent global DNA hypomethylation mitotically transmitted to adult plants; (2) pleiotropic developmental defects including decreased apical dominance, altered leaf and flower symmetry, flower whorl malformations and reduced fertility; (3) dramatic upregulation of floral organ identity genes NTDEF, NTGLO and NAG1 in leaves. We conclude that temporal SAH-hydrolase inhibition deregulated floral genes expression probably via chromatin methylation changes. The data further show that plants might be particularly sensitive to accurate setting of SAH/SAM levels during critical developmental periods.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):307-18 PubMed
Mol Gen Genet. 1998 Aug;259(2):133-41 PubMed
Nature. 2004 Jan 8;427(6970):164-7 PubMed
Acta Virol. 1983 May;27(3):273-6 PubMed
Nat Genet. 2003 Jan;33(1):102-6 PubMed
Plant J. 2001 Oct;28(2):159-68 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 25;97(9):4979-84 PubMed
Plant Cell. 1990 Dec;2(12):1201-1224 PubMed
Plant Sci. 2001 Mar;160(4):585-593 PubMed
Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Oct;105(5):796-801 PubMed
Plant J. 2008 Jun;54(6):1049-62 PubMed
Plant Cell. 1995 Feb;7(2):225-34 PubMed
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Jun;111(1):136-49 PubMed
FEBS Lett. 1994 Oct 24;353(3):309-11 PubMed
Plant Cell. 2010 Jan;22(1):34-47 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):8014-8 PubMed
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Mar;11(3):204-20 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990 Jun 1;57(3):239-43 PubMed
Curr Biol. 2000 Feb 24;10(4):179-86 PubMed
Plant Cell. 2005 Feb;17(2):404-17 PubMed
Physiol Plant. 2002 Oct;116(2):238-247 PubMed
EMBO J. 2004 Oct 27;23(21):4286-96 PubMed
Plant J. 1996 Oct;10(4):663-77 PubMed
Heredity (Edinb). 2002 Jan;88(1):19-25 PubMed
Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jun;43(2-3):189-201 PubMed
Mol Genet Genomics. 2007 Nov;278(5):565-73 PubMed
Nature. 2002 Apr 4;416(6880):556-60 PubMed
Plant J. 1993 Aug;4(2):379-84 PubMed
Plant Physiol. 2002 Jun;129(2):733-46 PubMed
Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Sep;91(4):659-64 PubMed
Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2008 Jul 1;64(Pt 7):671-3 PubMed
FEBS Lett. 2000 Feb 4;467(1):47-51 PubMed
Acta Virol. 1983 Mar;27(2):119-29 PubMed
Cell. 1993 Jan 15;72(1):85-95 PubMed
Science. 1997 Aug 22;277(5329):1100-3 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jun 20;92(13):6117-21 PubMed
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009 Jun;21(3):367-76 PubMed
Eur J Biochem. 1998 Mar 15;252(3):347-52 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2000;8(6):527-41 PubMed
Plant Cell. 2001 Aug;13(8):1919-28 PubMed
Theor Appl Genet. 1989 Jul;78(1):77-80 PubMed
Science. 2001 Jun 15;292(5524):2077-80 PubMed
Genetics. 2006 Nov;174(3):1161-71 PubMed
Nature. 2009 Sep 17;461(7262):427-30 PubMed
Genes Dev. 1991 Mar;5(3):484-95 PubMed
New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(1):135-47 PubMed
EMBO J. 2002 Dec 16;21(24):6842-52 PubMed
Mol Gen Genet. 1993 May;239(1-2):310-2 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8449-54 PubMed
Plant Physiol. 2009 Mar;149(3):1493-504 PubMed
Science. 1996 Aug 2;273(5275):654-7 PubMed
Cell. 2007 Sep 7;130(5):851-62 PubMed
Planta. 2003 Jan;216(3):461-6 PubMed
Plant Cell. 2003 Jul;15(7):1538-51 PubMed
Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jun;43(2-3):387-99 PubMed
Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Dec;35(6):981-6 PubMed
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 25;9:53 PubMed
Physiol Plant. 2010 May;139(1):118-27 PubMed
Plant Physiol. 1993 Dec;103(4):1041-6 PubMed
Science. 2009 Mar 20;323(5921):1600-4 PubMed
Trends Genet. 1997 Aug;13(8):319-23 PubMed
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010 Feb;21(1):80-6 PubMed
Plant Mol Biol. 2007 Nov;65(5):571-86 PubMed
Exploring the crop epigenome: a comparison of DNA methylation profiling techniques
Compromised telomere maintenance in hypomethylated Arabidopsis thaliana plants
How to interpret methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) profiles?