Isolation and comparison of tribe-specific centromeric repeats within Bovidae

. 2012 May ; 53 (2) : 193-202. [epub] 20120117

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid22249998

A taxonomic division of the family Bovidae (Artiodactyla) is difficult and the evolutionary relationships among most bovid subfamilies remain uncertain. In this study, we isolated the cattle satellite I clone BTREP15 (1.715 satellite DNA family) and autosomal centromeric DNAs of members of ten bovid tribes. We wished to determine whether the analysis of fluorescence in situ hybridization patterns of the cattle satellite I clone (BTREP15) and tribe-specific centromeric repeats isolated by laser microdissection would help to reveal some of the ambiguities occurring in the systematic classification of the family Bovidae. The FISH study of the presence and distribution of the cattle satellite I clone BTREP15 (1.715 satellite DNA family) within members of ten bovid tribes was not informative. FISH analysis of autosomal centromeric DNA probes in several species within one tribe revealed similar hybridization patterns in autosomes confirming tribal homogeneity of these probes. Sex chromosomes showed considerable variation in sequence composition and arrangement not only between tribes but also between species of one tribe. According to our findings it seems that Oreotragus oreotragus developed its own specific satellite DNA which does not hybridize to any other bovid species analysed. Our results suggest O. oreotragus as well as Aepyceros melampus may be unique species not particularly closely related to any of the recognized bovid tribes. This study indicates the isolation of tribe-specific centromeric DNAs by laser microdissection and cloning the sequence representing the main motif of these repetitive DNAs could offer the perspectives for comparative phylogenetic studies.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Mol Evol. 1995 Sep;41(3):277-83 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2008;16(7):935-47 PubMed

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;91(1-4):62-6 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2006;14(6):649-55 PubMed

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997 Jun;7(3):303-19 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 7;272(1576):2009-16 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1999;7(4):261-5 PubMed

Micron. 2008 Dec;39(8):1149-55 PubMed

EMBO J. 2002 Nov 15;21(22):5955-9 PubMed

J Mol Evol. 1996 Mar;42(3):337-49 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1997 Sep;5(6):375-81 PubMed

Gene. 2008 Feb 15;409(1-2):72-82 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;114(2):140-6 PubMed

Hereditas. 1987;106(1):73-81 PubMed

J Hered. 1992 Jul-Aug;83(4):287-98 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2003;11(7):641-8 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2002;10(7):571-7 PubMed

Eur J Biochem. 1978 Mar;84(1):179-88 PubMed

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Jul;36(1):154-68 PubMed

Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jul;18(7):1220-30 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 1999 May 7;266(1422):893-900 PubMed

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Dec;33(3):896-907 PubMed

Nejnovějších 20 citací...

Zobrazit více v
Medvik | PubMed

X Chromosome-Specific Repeats in Non-Domestic Bovidae

. 2024 Jan 25 ; 15 (2) : . [epub] 20240125

Meiotic behaviour of evolutionary sex-autosome translocations in Bovidae

. 2016 Sep ; 24 (3) : 325-38. [epub] 20160430

Tribe-specific satellite DNA in non-domestic Bovidae

. 2014 Sep ; 22 (3) : 277-91. [epub] 20140123

Male-specific repeats in wild Bovidae

. 2012 Nov ; 53 (4) : 423-33. [epub] 20120816

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...