Phylogenomic study of spiral-horned antelope by cross-species chromosome painting
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- druhová specificita MeSH
- fylogeneze * MeSH
- genomika * MeSH
- hybridizace in situ fluorescenční MeSH
- karyotypizace MeSH
- malování chromozomů * MeSH
- molekulární evoluce MeSH
- přežvýkavci klasifikace genetika MeSH
- savčí chromozomy genetika MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Chromosomal homologies have been established between cattle (Bos taurus, 2n = 60) and eight species of spiral-horned antelope, Tribe Tragelaphini: Nyala (Tragelaphus angasii, 2n = 55male/56female), Lesser kudu (T. imberbis, 2n = 38male,female), Bongo (T. eurycerus, 2n = 33male/34female), Bushbuck (T. scriptus, 2n = 33male/34female), Greater kudu (T. strepsiceros, 2n = 31male/32female), Sitatunga (T. spekei, 2n = 30male,female) Derby eland (Taurotragus derbianus 2n = 31male/32female) and Common eland (T. oryx 2n = 31male/32female). Chromosomes involved in centric fusions in these species were identified using a complete set of cattle painting probes generated by laser microdissection. Our data support the monophyly of Tragelaphini and a clade comprising T. scriptus, T. spekei, T. euryceros and the eland species T. oryx and T. derbianus, findings that are largely in agreement with sequence-based molecular phylogenies. In contrast, our study suggests that the arid adaptiveness of T. oryx and T. derbianus is recent. Finally, we have identified the presence of the rob(1;29) fusion as an evolutionary marker in most of the tragelaphid species investigated. This rearrangement is associated with reproductive impairment in cattle and raises questions whether subtle distinctions in breakpoint location or differential rescue during meiosis underpin the different outcomes detected among these lineages.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Lancet. 1971 Oct 30;2(7731):971-2 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;96(1-4):117-24 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1997;77(3-4):218-22 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;120(1-2):91-6 PubMed
Chromosoma. 2004 Aug;113(1):34-41 PubMed
Syst Biol. 2003 Apr;52(2):206-28 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1982;34(1-2):10-8 PubMed
Evolution. 1990 Dec;44(8):2135-2149 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 7;272(1576):2009-16 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2006;14(6):681-91 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;114(2):140-6 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1982;34(1-2):158-67 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1978;21(1-2):64-71 PubMed
Hereditas. 1987;106(1):73-81 PubMed
J Hered. 1992 Jul-Aug;83(4):287-98 PubMed
Syst Biol. 2004 Jun;53(3):470-84 PubMed
Hereditas. 1972;71(1):1-74 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;91(1-4):62-6 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1977;18(1):50-6 PubMed
Hereditas. 1979;90(2):281-9 PubMed
Nature. 2000 Jan 13;403(6766):158 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2005;13(4):349-55 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1986;43(3-4):161-7 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Jun;12(1):31-46 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 1997 Apr;5(2):109-17 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2006;14(6):649-55 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001;92(3-4):283-99 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997 Jun;7(3):303-19 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;89(3-4):171-6 PubMed
Theriogenology. 1991 Apr;35(4):705-14 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1986;43(1-2):19-27 PubMed
Syst Biol. 2008 Jun;57(3):503-7 PubMed
Chromosoma. 1993 May;102(5):355-60 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2002;10(7):571-7 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;96(1-4):33-9 PubMed
J Hered. 1995 May-Jun;86(3):216-27 PubMed
Theriogenology. 1988 Dec;30(6):1149-57 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 1999;7(6):481-92 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Jul;36(1):154-68 PubMed
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jul;18(7):1220-30 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2004;12(4):369-82 PubMed
Exp Cell Res. 1972 Nov;75(1):304-6 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Nov;13(2):227-43 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Jun;35(3):624-36 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998;80(1-4):179-84 PubMed
J Vet Diagn Invest. 1996 Jan;8(1):91-5 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 1999 May 7;266(1422):893-900 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Dec;33(3):896-907 PubMed
X Chromosome-Specific Repeats in Non-Domestic Bovidae
Chromosomal Aberrations in Cattle
Sequence Analysis and FISH Mapping of Four Satellite DNA Families among Cervidae
Karyotype relationships among selected deer species and cattle revealed by bovine FISH probes
Meiotic behaviour of evolutionary sex-autosome translocations in Bovidae
Tribe-specific satellite DNA in non-domestic Bovidae
Isolation and comparison of tribe-specific centromeric repeats within Bovidae