Molecular cytogenetic insights to the phylogenetic affinities of the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) and pronghorn (Antilocapra americana)

. 2013 Aug ; 21 (5) : 447-60. [epub] 20130730

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid23896647

Five families are traditionally recognized within higher ruminants (Pecora): Bovidae, Moschidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae and Antilocapridae. The phylogenetic relationships of Antilocapridae and Giraffidae within Pecora are, however, uncertain. While numerous fusions (mostly Robertsonian) have accumulated in the giraffe's karyotype (Giraffa camelopardalis, Giraffidae, 2n = 30), that of the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana, Antilocapridae, 2n = 58) is very similar to the hypothesised pecoran ancestral state (2n = 58). We examined the chromosomal rearrangements of two species, the giraffe and pronghorn, using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization painting probes and BAC clones derived from cattle (Bos taurus, Bovidae). Our data place Moschus (Moschidae) closer to Bovidae than Cervidae. Although the alternative (i.e., Moschidae + Cervidae as sister groups) could not be discounted in recent sequence-based analyses, cytogenetics bolsters conclusions that the former is more likely. Additionally, DNA sequences were isolated from the centromeric regions of both species and compared. Analysis of cenDNA show that unlike the pronghorn, the centromeres of the giraffe are probably organized in a more complex fashion comprising different repetitive sequences specific to single chromosomal pairs or groups of chromosomes. The distribution of nucleolar organiser region (NOR) sites, often an effective phylogenetic marker, were also examined in the two species. In the giraffe, the position of NORs seems to be autapomorphic since similar localizations have not been found in other species within Pecora.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Appl Genet. 2012 Nov;53(4):423-33 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2009;17(3):419-36 PubMed

J Mol Evol. 1995 Sep;41(3):277-83 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;122(1):41-54 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;126(1-2):49-62 PubMed

Syst Biol. 2011 Jul;60(4):439-50 PubMed

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;91(1-4):62-6 PubMed

Syst Biol. 2003 Apr;52(2):206-28 PubMed

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;89(3-4):171-6 PubMed

Ann Genet. 1986;29(4):232-4 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2001;9(4):301-8 PubMed

Genetics. 2002 Apr;160(4):1587-97 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2012;136(3):188-98 PubMed

Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010;11:291-316 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;108(4):310-6 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2001;9(8):673-87 PubMed

Lancet. 1971 Oct 30;2(7731):971-2 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2009;17(4):497-506 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2008;16(8):1107-18 PubMed

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1996;73(1-2):116-22 PubMed

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1978;21(1-2):64-71 PubMed

Hereditas. 1987;106(1):73-81 PubMed

Genetica. 2006 May;127(1-3):25-33 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2008;16(7):935-47 PubMed

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998;81(1):36-41 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;122(2):132-8 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2011;132(4):255-63 PubMed

C R Biol. 2012 Jan;335(1):32-50 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;125(1):40-5 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2005;13(6):569-74 PubMed

Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Dec;8(12):950-62 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2006;14(6):649-55 PubMed

Genetica. 2004 Jul;121(3):315-25 PubMed

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001;92(3-4):283-99 PubMed

Chromosoma. 1975 Nov 20;53(1):37-50 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18644-9 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2002;10(7):571-7 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2003;11(7):641-8 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2008;16(8):1133-41 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1999;7(6):481-92 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2010 Feb;18(2):277-86 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 7;272(1576):2009-16 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 1999;7(4):261-5 PubMed

Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Jan;108(1):59-67 PubMed

J Hered. 1994 May-Jun;85(3):204-10 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2003;11(7):649-63 PubMed

EMBO J. 2002 Nov 15;21(22):5955-9 PubMed

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998;80(1-4):179-84 PubMed

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2012;137(2-4):194-207 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2012 May;20(4):413-25 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace