Molecular cytogenetic insights to the phylogenetic affinities of the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) and pronghorn (Antilocapra americana)
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- centromera genetika MeSH
- chromozom X MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- hybridizace in situ fluorescenční MeSH
- karyotyp MeSH
- malování chromozomů MeSH
- organizátor jadérka MeSH
- přežvýkavci klasifikace genetika MeSH
- pruhování chromozomů MeSH
- repetitivní sekvence nukleových kyselin MeSH
- savčí chromozomy MeSH
- skot MeSH
- translokace genetická MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- skot MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Five families are traditionally recognized within higher ruminants (Pecora): Bovidae, Moschidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae and Antilocapridae. The phylogenetic relationships of Antilocapridae and Giraffidae within Pecora are, however, uncertain. While numerous fusions (mostly Robertsonian) have accumulated in the giraffe's karyotype (Giraffa camelopardalis, Giraffidae, 2n = 30), that of the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana, Antilocapridae, 2n = 58) is very similar to the hypothesised pecoran ancestral state (2n = 58). We examined the chromosomal rearrangements of two species, the giraffe and pronghorn, using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization painting probes and BAC clones derived from cattle (Bos taurus, Bovidae). Our data place Moschus (Moschidae) closer to Bovidae than Cervidae. Although the alternative (i.e., Moschidae + Cervidae as sister groups) could not be discounted in recent sequence-based analyses, cytogenetics bolsters conclusions that the former is more likely. Additionally, DNA sequences were isolated from the centromeric regions of both species and compared. Analysis of cenDNA show that unlike the pronghorn, the centromeres of the giraffe are probably organized in a more complex fashion comprising different repetitive sequences specific to single chromosomal pairs or groups of chromosomes. The distribution of nucleolar organiser region (NOR) sites, often an effective phylogenetic marker, were also examined in the two species. In the giraffe, the position of NORs seems to be autapomorphic since similar localizations have not been found in other species within Pecora.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Appl Genet. 2012 Nov;53(4):423-33 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2009;17(3):419-36 PubMed
J Mol Evol. 1995 Sep;41(3):277-83 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;122(1):41-54 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;126(1-2):49-62 PubMed
Syst Biol. 2011 Jul;60(4):439-50 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;91(1-4):62-6 PubMed
Syst Biol. 2003 Apr;52(2):206-28 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;89(3-4):171-6 PubMed
Ann Genet. 1986;29(4):232-4 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2001;9(4):301-8 PubMed
Genetics. 2002 Apr;160(4):1587-97 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2012;136(3):188-98 PubMed
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010;11:291-316 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;108(4):310-6 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2001;9(8):673-87 PubMed
Lancet. 1971 Oct 30;2(7731):971-2 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2009;17(4):497-506 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2008;16(8):1107-18 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1996;73(1-2):116-22 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1978;21(1-2):64-71 PubMed
Hereditas. 1987;106(1):73-81 PubMed
Genetica. 2006 May;127(1-3):25-33 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2008;16(7):935-47 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998;81(1):36-41 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;122(2):132-8 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2011;132(4):255-63 PubMed
C R Biol. 2012 Jan;335(1):32-50 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;125(1):40-5 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2005;13(6):569-74 PubMed
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Dec;8(12):950-62 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2006;14(6):649-55 PubMed
Genetica. 2004 Jul;121(3):315-25 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001;92(3-4):283-99 PubMed
Chromosoma. 1975 Nov 20;53(1):37-50 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18644-9 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2002;10(7):571-7 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2003;11(7):641-8 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2008;16(8):1133-41 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 1999;7(6):481-92 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2010 Feb;18(2):277-86 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 7;272(1576):2009-16 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 1999;7(4):261-5 PubMed
Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Jan;108(1):59-67 PubMed
J Hered. 1994 May-Jun;85(3):204-10 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2003;11(7):649-63 PubMed
EMBO J. 2002 Nov 15;21(22):5955-9 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998;80(1-4):179-84 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2012;137(2-4):194-207 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2012 May;20(4):413-25 PubMed