The parabasalid protist Trichomonas vaginalis is a widespread parasite that affects humans, frequently causing vaginitis in infected women. Trichomonad mitosis is marked by the persistence of the nuclear membrane and the presence of an asymmetric extranuclear spindle with no obvious direct connection to the chromosomes. No centromeric markers have been described in T. vaginalis, which has prevented a detailed analysis of mitotic events in this organism. In other eukaryotes, nucleosomes of centromeric chromatin contain the histone H3 variant CenH3. The principal aim of this work was to identify a CenH3 homolog in T. vaginalis. We performed a screen of the T. vaginalis genome to retrieve sequences of canonical and variant H3 histones. Three variant histone H3 proteins were identified, and the subcellular localization of their epitope-tagged variants was determined. The localization of the variant TVAG_185390 could not be distinguished from that of the canonical H3 histone. The sequence of the variant TVAG_087830 closely resembled that of histone H3. The tagged protein colocalized with sites of active transcription, indicating that the variant TVAG_087830 represented H3.3 in T. vaginalis. The third H3 variant (TVAG_224460) was localized to 6 or 12 distinct spots at the periphery of the nucleus, corresponding to the number of chromosomes in G(1) phase and G(2) phase, respectively. We propose that this variant represents the centromeric marker CenH3 and thus can be employed as a tool to study mitosis in T. vaginalis. Furthermore, we suggest that the peripheral distribution of CenH3 within the nucleus results from the association of centromeres with the nuclear envelope throughout the cell cycle.

Department of Parasitology Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ahmad K, Henikoff S. 2002. Histone H3 variants specify modes of chromatin assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:16477–16484 PubMed PMC

Brooks CF, et al. 2011. Toxoplasma gondii sequesters centromeres to a specific nuclear region throughout the cell cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:3767–3772 PubMed PMC

Brugerolle G. 1975. Étude de la cryptopleuromitose et de la morphogenèse de division chez Trichomonas vaginalis et chez plusiers de trichomonadines primitives. Protistologica 11:457–468

Carlton JM, et al. 2007. Draft genome sequence of the sexually transmitted pathogen Trichomonas vaginalis. Science 315:207–212 PubMed PMC

Cepicka I, Hampl V, Kulda J. 2010. Critical taxonomic revision of Parabasalids with description of one new genus and three new species. Protist 161:400–433 PubMed

Cervantes MD, Xi X, Vermaak D, Yao MC, Malik HS. 2006. The CNA1 histone of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila is essential for chromosome segregation in the germline micronucleus. Mol. Biol. Cell 17:485–497 PubMed PMC

Cui B, Liu Y, Gorovsky MA. 2006. Deposition and function of histone H3 variants in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:7719–7730 PubMed PMC

Dalal Y, Furuyama T, Vermaak D, Henikoff S. 2007. Structure, dynamics, and evolution of centromeric nucleosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:15974–15981 PubMed PMC

Dawson SC, Sagolla MS, Cande WZ. 2007. The cenH3 histone variant defines centromeres in Giardia intestinalis. Chromosoma 116:175–184 PubMed

Dernburg AF. 2001. Here, there, and everywhere: kinetochore function on holocentric chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 153:F33–F38 PubMed PMC

Diamond LS. 1957. The establishment of various trichomonads of animals and man in axenic cultures. J. Parasitol. 43:488–490 PubMed

Dolezal P, et al. 2005. Giardia mitosomes and trichomonad hydrogenosomes share a common mode of protein targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:10924–10929 PubMed PMC

Drmota T, Král J. 1997. Karyotype of Trichomonas vaginalis. Eur. J. Protistol. 33:131–135

Fichorova RN. 2009. Impact of T. vaginalis infection on innate immune responses and reproductive outcome. J. Reprod. Immunol. 83:185–189 PubMed PMC

Fisk JC, Read LK. 2011. Protein arginine methylation in parasitic protozoa. Eukaryot. Cell 10:1013–1022 PubMed PMC

Guerra M, et al. 2010. Neocentrics and holokinetics (holocentrics): chromosomes out of the centromeric rules. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 129:82–96 PubMed

Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. (Oxf.) 41:95–98

Heath IB. 1980. Variant mitoses in lower eukaryotes—indicators of the evolution of mitosis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 64:1–80 PubMed

Henikoff S, Ahmad K. 2005. Assembly of variant histones into chromatin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21:133–153 PubMed

Lowell JE, Cross GA. 2004. A variant histone H3 is enriched at telomeres in Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Sci. 117:5937–5947 PubMed

Maddox PS, Oegema K, Desai A, Cheeseman IM. 2004. “Holo”er than thou: chromosome segregation and kinetochore function in C. elegans. Chromosome Res. 12:641–653 PubMed

Marinets A, et al. 1996. The sequence and organization of the core histone H3 and H4 genes in the early branching amitochondriate protist Trichomonas vaginalis. J. Mol. Evol. 43:563–571 PubMed

Nagaki K, Kashihara K, Murata M. 2005. Visualization of diffuse centromeres with centromere-specific histone H3 in the holocentric plant Luzula nivea. Plant Cell 17:1886–1893 PubMed PMC

Postberg J, Forcob S, Chang WJ, Lipps HJ. 2010. The evolutionary history of histone H3 suggests a deep eukaryotic root of chromatin modifying mechanisms. BMC Evol. Biol. 10:259. PubMed PMC

Raikov IB. 1994. The diversity of forms of mitosis in protozoa—a comparative review. Eur. J. Protistol. 30:253–269

Ribeiro KC, Monteiro-Leal LH, Benchimol M. 2000. Contributions of the axostyle and flagella to closed mitosis in the protists Tritrichomonas foetus and Trichomonas vaginalis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 47:481–492 PubMed

Ribeiro KC, Pereira-Neves A, Benchimol M. 2002. The mitotic spindle and associated membranes in the closed mitosis of trichomonads. Biol. Cell 94:157–172 PubMed

Riley DE, Krieger JN, Miner D, Rabinovitch PS. 1994. Trichomonas vaginalis: dominant G2 period and G2 phase arrest in a representative of an early branching eukaryotic lineage. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 41:408–414 PubMed

Santaguida S, Musacchio A. 2009. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28:2511–2531 PubMed PMC

Schwebke JR, Burgess D. 2004. Trichomoniasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17:794–803 PubMed PMC

Sekulic N, Bassett EA, Rogers DJ, Black BE. 2010. The structure of (CENP-A-H4)2 reveals physical features that mark centromeres. Nature 467:347–351 PubMed PMC

Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:W244–W248 PubMed PMC

Sullivan KF, Hechenberger M, Masri K. 1994. Human CENP-A contains a histone H3 related histone fold domain that is required for targeting to the centromere. J. Cell Biol. 127:581–592 PubMed PMC

Sutak R, et al. 2004. Mitochondrial-type assembly of FeS centers in the hydrogenosomes of the amitochondriate eukaryote Trichomonas vaginalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:10368–10373 PubMed PMC

Szenker E, Ray-Gallet D, Almouzni G. 2011. The double face of the histone variant H3.3. Cell Res. 21:421–434 PubMed PMC

Talbert PB, Henikoff S. 2010. Histone variants—ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:264–275 PubMed

Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4876–4882 PubMed PMC

Torres-Machorro AL, Hernandez R, Alderete JF, Lopez-Villasenor I. 2009. Comparative analyses among the Trichomonas vaginalis, Trichomonas tenax, and Tritrichomonas foetus 5S ribosomal RNA genes. Curr. Genet. 55:199–210 PubMed

Turner BM. 2002. Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell 111:285–291 PubMed

Wood CM, et al. 2005. High-resolution structure of the native histone octamer. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 61:541–545 PubMed PMC

Zeitlin SG, et al. 2009. Double-strand DNA breaks recruit the centromeric histone CENP-A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:15762–15767 PubMed PMC

Zubacova Z, Cimburek Z, Tachezy J. 2008. Comparative analysis of trichomonad genome sizes and karyotypes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 161:49–54 PubMed

Zubacova Z, Krylov V, Tachezy J. 2011. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of single copy genes on Trichomonas vaginalis chromosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 176:135–137 PubMed

Conservation of Transit Peptide-Independent Protein Import into the Mitochondrial and Hydrogenosomal Matrix