Seed density significantly affects species richness and composition in experimental plant communities

. 2012 ; 7 (10) : e46704. [epub] 20121015

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid23077519

Studies on the importance of seed arrival for community richness and composition have not considered the number of seeds arriving and its effect on species richness and composition of natural communities is thus unknown. A series of experimental dry grassland communities were established. All communities were composed of the same 44 species in exactly the same proportions on two substrates using three different seed densities.The results showed that seed density had an effect on species richness only at the beginning of the experiment. In contrast, the effects on species composition persisted across the entire study period. The results do not support the prediction that due to higher competition for light in nutrient-rich soil, species richness will be the highest in the treatment with the lowest seed density. However, the prevalence of small plants in the lowest seed density supported the expectation that low seed density guarantees low competition under high soil nutrients. In the nutrient-poor soil, species richness was the highest at the medium seed density, indicating that species richness reflects the balance between competition and limitations caused by the availability of propagules or their ability to establish themselves. This medium seed density treatment also contained the smallest plants.The results demonstrate that future seed addition experiments need to consider the amount of seed added so that it reflects the amount of seed that is naturally found in the field. Differences in seed density, mimicking different intensity of the seed rain may also explain differences in the composition of natural communities that cannot be attributed to habitat conditions. The results also have important implications for studies regarding the consequences of habitat fragmentation suggesting that increasing fragmentation may change species compositions not only due to different dispersal abilities but also due to differential response of plants to overall seed density.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Levine JM, Murrell DJ (2003) The community-level consequences of seed dispersal patterns. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 34: 549–574.

Zobel M, Opik M, Moora M, Partel M (2006) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: It is time for dispersal experiments. J Veg Sci 17: 543–547.

Myers JA, Harms KE (2009) Seed arrival, ecological filters, and plant species richness: A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 12: 1250–1260. PubMed

Terborgh J, Alvarez-Loayza P, Dexter K, Cornejo F, Carrasco C (2011) Decomposing dispersal limitation: Limits on fecundity or seed distribution? J Ecol 99: 935–944.

MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Stachowicz JJ, Tilman D (2005) What species invasions tell us about the relationship between community saturation, species diversity and ecosystem functioning. In: Sax D, Stachowicz J, Gaines S, editors. Species invasions: Insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. pp. 41–64.

Hubbell SP (2001) The Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Chase JM (2003) Community assembly: When should history matter? Oecologia 136: 489–498. PubMed

Zhang QG, Zhang DY (2007) Colonization sequence influences selection and complementarity effects on biomass production in experimental algal microcosms. Oikos 116: 1748–1758.

Korner C, Stocklin J, Reuther-Thiebaud L, Pelaez-Riedl S (2008) Small differences in arrival time influence composition and productivity of plant communities. New Phytol 177: 698–705. PubMed

Brown RL, Fridley JD (2003) Control of plant species diversity and community invasibility by species immigration: seed richness versus seed density. Oikos 102: 15–24.

Foster BL, Tilman D (2003) Seed limitation and the regulation of community structure in oak savanna grassland. J Ecol 91: 999–1007.

Eskelinen A, Virtanen R (2005) Local and regional processes in low-productive mountain plant communities: The roles of seed and microsite limitation in relation to grazing. Oikos 110: 360–368.

Dickson TL, Foster BL (2008) The relative importance of the species pool, productivity and disturbance in regulating grassland plant species richness: A field experiment. J Ecol 96: 937–946.

Fraser LH, Madson EB (2008) The interacting effects of herbivore exclosures and seed addition in a wet meadow. Oikos 117: 1057–1063.

Vandvik V, Goldberg DE (2005) Distinguishing the roles of dispersal in diversity maintenance and in diversity limitation. Folia Geobot 40: 45–52.

Vandvik V, Goldberg DE (2006) Sources of diversity in a grassland metacommunity: quantifying the contribution of dispersal to species richness. Am Nat 168: 157–167. PubMed

Goldberg DE, Turkington R, Olsvig-Whittaker L (1995) Quantifying the community-level consequences of competition. Folia Geobot 30: 231–242.

MacDougall AS, Wilson SD (2007) Herbivory limits recruitment in an old-field seed addition experiment. Ecology 88: 1105–1111. PubMed

Goldberg DE, Estabrook G (1998) A method for comparing diversity and species abundances among samples of different sizes and an experimental example with desert annuals. J Ecol 86: 983–988.

Levins R, Culver D (1971) Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. P Natl Acad Sci USA 68: 1246–1248. PubMed PMC

Cadotte MW, Mai DV, Jantz S, Keele M, Drake JA (2006) On testing the competition–colonization tradeoff in a multispecies assemblage. Am Nat 168: 704–709. PubMed

Keddy PA, Twolan-Strutt L, Wisheu IC (1994) Competitive effect and response rankings in 20 wetland plants: Are they consistent across three environments? J Ecol 82: 635–643.

Keddy PA (2001) Competition. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Callaway RM, Walker LR (1997) Competition and facilitation: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78: 1958–1965.

Goldberg DE, Rajaniemi T, Gurevitch J, Stewart-Oaten A (1999) Empirical approaches to quantifying inter-action intensity: Competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology 80: 1118–1131.

Foster BL, Dickson TL, Murény CA, Karel IS, Smith VH (2004) Propagule pools mediate community assembly and diversity-ecosystem regulation along a grassland productivity gradient. J Ecol 92: 435–449.

Foster BL (2001) Constraints on colonization and species richness along a grassland productivity gradient: The role of propagule availability. Ecol Lett 4: 530–535.

Holmgren M, Scheffer M (2010) Strong facilitation in mild environments: The stress gradient hypothesis revisited. J Ecol 98: 1269–1275.

Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Keddy PA (1990) Competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization in plant communities. In: Grace J, Tilman D, editors. Perspectives on plant competition. New York: Academic Press. pp. 265–89.

Bonser SP, Reader RJ (1995) Plant competition and herbivory in relation to vegetation biomass. Ecology 76: 2176–2183.

Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of slant communities. Monographs in population biology 26. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 360 p.

Taylor DR, Aarssen LW, Loehle C (1990) On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: A new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. Oikos 58: 239–250.

Lamb EG (2008) Direct and indirect control of grassland community structure by litter, resources, and biomass. Ecology 89: 216–225. PubMed

Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties, 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton: Princeton University Press. PubMed

Waide RB, Willig MR, Steiner CF, Mittelbach G, Gough L, et al. (1999) The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 30: 257–300.

Gross KL, Willig MR, Gough L, Inouye R, Cox SB (2000) Species density and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 89: 417–427.

Safford HD, Rejmanek M, Hadac E (2001) Species pools and the ‘hump-back’ model of plant species diversity: An empirical analysis at a relevant spatial scale. Oikos 95: 282–290.

Harrison S, Davies KF, Safford HD, Viers JH (2006) Beta diversity and the scale-dependence of the productivity-diversity relationship: A test in the Californian serpentine flora. J Ecol 94: 110–117.

Corcket E, Callaway RM, Michalet R (2003) Insect herbivory and grass competition in a calcareous grassland: Results from a plant removal experiment. Acta Oecol 24: 139–146.

Silletti AM, Knapp AK, Blair JM (2004) Competition and coexistence in grassland codominants: Responses to neighbor removal and resource availability. Can J Bot 82: 450–460.

Polley HW, Wilsey BJ, Derner JD, Johnson HB, Sanabria J (2006) Early-successional plants regulate grassland productivity and species composition: A removal experiment. Oikos 113: 287–295.

Howard TG (2001) The relationship of total and pergram rankings in competitive effect to the natural abundance of herbaceous perennials. J Ecol 89: 110–117.

Goldberg DE, Landa K (1991) Competitive effect and response: Hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. J Ecol 79: 1013–1030.

Rajaniemi TK, Turkington R, Goldberg D (2009) Community-level consequences of species interactions in an annual plant community. J Veg Sci 20: 836–846.

Craine JM, Froehle J, Tilman DG, Wedin DA, Chapin FS (2001) The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93: 274–285.

Suding KN, Goldberg DE, Hartman KM (2003) Relationships among species traits: Separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology 84: 1–16.

Chýlová T, Münzbergová Z (2008) Past land use co-determines present distribution of dry grassland plant species. Preslia 80: 183–198.

Knappová J, Hemrová L, Münzbergová Z (2012) Colonization of central European abandoned fields by dry grassland species depends on the species richness of the source habitats: A new approach for measuring habitat isolation. Landscape Ecol 27: 97–108.

Münzbergová Z (2004) Effect of spatial scale on factors limiting species distributions in dry grassland fragments. J Ecol 92: 854–867.

Tremlová K, Münzbergová Z (2007) Importance of species traits for species distribution in fragmented landscapes. Ecology 88: 965–977. PubMed

S- Plus (2000) Professional edition for Windows, release 2. Massachusetts: MathSoft, Inc.

ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual CanoDraw for Windows user's guide, software for canonical community ordination version 4.5. Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power.

Lindborg R (2007) Evaluating the distribution of plant life-history traits in relation to current and historical landscape configurations. J Ecol 95: 555–564.

Ockinger E, Schweiger O, Crist TO, Debinski DM, Krauss J, et al. (2010) Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: A cross-continental synthesis. Ecol Lett 13: 969–979. PubMed

Ehrlen J, Ericsson O (2000) Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81: 1667–1674.

Piessens K, Honnay O, Hermy M (2005) The role of fragment area and isolation in the conservation of heathland species. Biol Conserv 122: 61–69.

Brewer JS (2011) Disturbance-mediated competition between perennial plants along a resource supply gradient. J Ecol 99: 1219–1228.

Goldberg DE, Turkington R, Olsvig-Whittaker L, Dyer AR (2001) Density dependence in an annual plant community: Variation among life history stages. Ecol Monogr 71: 423–446.

Warren J, Topping CJ, James P (2009) A unifying evolutionary theory for the biomass-diversity-fertility relationship. Theor Ecol 2: 119–126.

Harper JL (1977) The population biology of plants. London: Academic Press.

Williamson GB (1990) Allelopathy, Koch's postulates, and the neck riddle. In: Grace JB, Tilman D, editors. Perspectives on plant competition. San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press. pp. 143–162.

Connell JH (1990) Apparent versus “real” competition in plant communities. In: Grace JB, Tilman D, editors. Perspectives on plant competition. San Diego, California, USA: Academic Press. pp. 9–26.

Münzbergová Z, Ward D (2002) Acacia trees as keystone species in the Negev desert ecosystems. J Veg Sci 13: 227–236.

Olsson PA, Martensson LM, Bruun HH (2009) Acidification of sandy grasslands - consequences for plant diversity. Appl Veg Sci 12: 350–361.

Bustamante-Sanchez MA, Armesto JJ, Halpern CB (2011) Biotic and abiotic controls on tree colonization in three early successional communities of Chiloe Island, Chile. J Ecol 99: 288–299.

Foster BL, Questad EJ, Collins CD, Murphy CA, Dickson TL, et al. (2011) Seed availability constrains plant species sorting along a soil fertility gradient. J Ecol 99: 473–481.

Oksanen J (1996) Is the humped relationship between species richness and biomass an artefact due to plot size? J Ecol 84: 293–295.

Wardle DA (2001) Experimental demonstration that plant diversity reduces invasibility – evidence of a biological mechanism or a consequence of sampling effect? Oikos 95: 161–170.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...