BACKGROUND: The patients with the long QT syndrome type-1 (LQT-1) have an impaired adaptation of the QT interval to heart rate changes. Yet, the description of the dynamic QT-RR coupling in genotyped LQT-1 has never been thoroughly investigated. METHOD: We propose a method to model the dynamic QT-RR coupling by defining a transfer function characterizing the relationship between a QT interval and its previous RR intervals measured from ambulatory Holter recordings. Three parameters are used to characterize the QT-RR coupling: a fast gain (Gain(F) ), a slow gain (Gain(L) ), and a time constant (τ). We investigated the values of these parameters across genders, and in genotyped LQT-1 patients with normal QTc interval duration (QTc < 470 ms). RESULTS: The QT-RR dynamic profiles are significantly different between LQT-1 patients (97) and controls (154): LQT-1 have longer QTc interval (453 ± 35 vs. 384 ± 26 ms, P < 0.0001), and an increased dependency of the QT interval to previous RR changes revealed by a larger Gain(L) (0.22 ± 0.06 vs. 0.18 ± 0.07, P < 0.0001) and Gain(F) (0.05 ± 0.02 vs. 0.03 ± 0.01, P < 0.0001). Importantly, LQT-1 patients have a faster QT dynamic response to previous RR changes described by τ: 122 ± 44 vs. 172 ± 92 beats (P < 0.0001). This faster QT dynamic response of the QT-RR dynamic coupling remained in LQT-1 patients with QTc in a normal range (<430 ms). CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of QT-RR dynamic coupling could be used in patients suspected to carry a concealed form of the LQT-1 syndrome, or to provide insights into the types of arrhythmogenic triggers a patient may be prone to.

Institute of Scientific Instruments AS CR Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Sanguinetti MC, Curran ME, Zou A, et al. Coassembly of K(V)LQT‐1 and minK (IsK) proteins to form cardiac I(Ks) potassium channel. Nature 1996;384:80–83. PubMed

Splawski I, Timothy KW, Vincent GM, et al. Molecular basis of the long‐QT syndrome associated with deafness. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1562–1567. PubMed

Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Spazzolini C, et al. Genotype‐phenotype correlation in the long‐QT syndrome: Gene‐specific triggers for life‐threatening arrhythmias. Circulation 2001;103:89–95. PubMed

Coumel P, Maison‐Blanche P. QT dynamicity as a predictor for arrhythmia development In Ota A, Breithardt C. (eds.): Myocardial Repolarization: From Gene to Bedside. NY , Futura publishing, 2001.

Viskin S, Postema PG, Bhuiyan ZA, et al. The response of the QT interval to the brief tachycardia provoked by standing: A bedside test for diagnosing long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1955–1961. PubMed PMC

Horner JM, Horner MM, Ackerman MJ. The diagnostic utility of recovery phase QTc during treadmill exercise stress testing in the evaluation of long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:1698–1704. PubMed

Hekkala AM, Swan H, Vitasalo M, et al. Epinephrine bolus test in detecting long QT syndrome mutation carriers with indeterminable electrocardiographic phenotype. Ann Nonin Electrocardiol 2011;16:172–179. PubMed PMC

Extramiana F, Denjoy I, Badilini F, et al. Heart rate influences on repolarization duration and morphology in symptomatic versus asymptomatic KCNQ1 mutation carriers. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:406–409. PubMed

Neyroud N, Maison‐Blanche P, Denjoy I, et al. Diagnostic performance of QT interval variables from 24‐h electrocardiography in the long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J 1998;19:158–165. PubMed

Barsheshet A, Peterson DR, Moss AJ, et al. Genotype‐specific QT correction for heart rate and the risk of life‐threatening cardiac events in adolescents with congenital long‐QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:1207–1213. PubMed PMC

Couderc JP. A unique digital electrocardiographic repository for the development of quantitative electrocardiography and cardiac safety: The Telemetric and Holter ECG Warehouse (THEW). J Electrocardiol 2010;43:595–600. PubMed PMC

Extramiana F, Tatar C, Maison‐Blanche P, et al. Beat‐to‐beat T‐wave amplitude variability in the long QT syndrome. Europace 2010;12:1302–1307. PubMed

Couderc JP, Zhou M, Sarapa N, et al. Investigating the effect of sotalol on the repolarization intervals in healthy young individuals. J Electrocardiol 2008;41:595–602. PubMed

Halamek J, Jurak P, Villa M, et al. Dynamic coupling between heart rate and ventricular repolarization. Biomed Tech Biomed Eng 2007; 52:255–263. PubMed

Halamek J, Jurak P, Bunch T, et al. Use of a novel transfer function to reduce repolarization interval hysteresis. J Interv Card Electr 2010;29:23–32. PubMed

Franz MR, Swerdlow ChD, Liem LB, et al. Cycle length dependence of human action potential duration in vivo. Effects of single extrastimuli, sudden sustained rate acceleration and deceleration, and different steady‐state frequencies. J Clin Invest 1988;82:972–979. PubMed PMC

Padrini R, Sperenza G, Nollo G, et al. Adaptation of the QT interval to heart rate changes in isolated perfused quinea pig heart: Influence of amidorane and D‐sotanol. Pharmacol Res 1997;35:409–416. PubMed

Zareba W, Moss AJ, Schwartz PJ, et al. Influence of genotype on the clinical course of the long‐QT syndrome. International Long‐QT Syndrome Registry Research Group. N Engl J Med 1998;339:960–965. PubMed

Zhang L, Timothy KW, Vincent GM, et al. Spectrum of ST‐T‐wave patterns and repolarization parameters in congenital long‐QT syndrome: ECG findings identify genotypes. Circulation 2000;102:2849–2855. PubMed

Vahedi F, Haney MF, Jensen SM, et al. Effect of heart rate on ventricular repolarization in healthy individuals applying vectorcardiographic T vector and T vector loop analysis. cquired long QT syndrome. Ann Nonin Electrocardiol 2011;16:287–294. PubMed PMC

Couderc JP, Xia X, Peterson DR, et al. T‐Wave morphology abnormalities in benign, potent and arrhythmogenic Ikr inhibition. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:1036–1043. PubMed PMC

Zareba W, Moss AJ, le Cessie S, Hall WJ. T wave alternans in idiopathic long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1541–1546. PubMed

Nemec J, Ackerman MJ, Tester DJ, et al. Catecholamineprovoked microvoltage T wave alternans in genotyped long QT syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003;26:1660–1667. PubMed

Nemec J, Hejlik J, Shen WK, et al. Catecholamine‐induced T wave lability in congenital long QT syndrome: A novel phenomenon associated with syncope and cardiac arrest. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78:40–50. PubMed

Nemec J, Buncova M, Bulkova V, et al. Heart rate dependence of the QT interval duration: Differences among congenital long QT syndrome subtypes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004;15:550–556. PubMed

Tan HL, Bardai A, Shimizu W, et al. Genotype‐specific onset of arrhythmias in congenital long‐QT syndrome: Possible therapy implications. Circulation 2006;114:2096–2103. PubMed

Merri M, Moss AJ, Benhorini J, et al. Relation between ventricular repolarization duration and cardiac cycle length during 24‐hour Holter recordings. Findings in normal patients and patients with long QT syndrome. Circulation 1992;85:1816–1821. PubMed

Couderc JP, Xia X, Moss A, et al. Instantaneous response of QT to RR changes identifies an impairment of repolarization adaptation to heart rate in the LQT‐1 syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:E793.

Costa J, Lopes CM, Barsheshet A, et al. Combined assessment of sex‐ and mutation‐specific information for risk stratification in type 1 long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:892–898. PubMed PMC

Roden DM: Taking the idio out of idiosyncratic: Predicting torsades de pointes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1029–1034. PubMed

Zareba W, Moss AJ, Locati EH, et al. Modulating effects of age and gender on the clinical course of long QT syndrome by genotype. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 2003;42:103–109. PubMed

Roden DM. Long‐QT syndrome. N Engl J Med 2008;358:169–176. PubMed

Halamek J, Jurak P, Villa M, et al. Dynamic QT‐RR coupling in patients with pacemakers. Proc. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007, 29:919–922. PubMed