Detection and identification of globally distributed mycobacterial fish pathogens in some ornamental fish in India

. 2013 Sep ; 58 (5) : 429-36. [epub] 20130130

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid23358914

Mycobacteriosis is a progressive disease of a wide range of wild and captive, marine and freshwater fish species. Conventional detection of fish Mycobacteria is based on histopathology, culture, and biochemical characteristics. The present study analyzed the occurrence of Mycobacteria in clinically ill ornamental fish of different species, from different places of India. In first group, 60 fish were examined for presence of granulomatous inflammation and acid-fast bacteria. Thirty-eight (63.34 %) fish were positive for granulomatous inflammations. Presences of acid-fast bacteria were detected in 27 (45 %) fish having granulomatous inflammation and in two (3.33 %) fish without granulomatous inflammation. In total, AFB were found in 29 (48.34 %) of the 60 fish examined. In second group, 20 fish having granulomatous inflammation, 12 (60 %) samples were positive using Ziehl-Neelsen (Z-N) staining and 11 (55 %) of them were culture positive. Eight (40 %) samples were Z-N negative but two (10 %) of them were culture positive. In total, 13 (65 %) of the 20 examined fish were culture positive. On the basis of biochemical tests and 16S rRNA sequencing, 13 isolates were identified: five as Mycobacterium fortuitum, five as Mycobacterium gordonae, and three as Mycobacterium chelonae. In comparison of two decontamination methods, 2 % HCl treatment was better than 4 % NaOH treatment. Mycobacteria recovery from decontaminated samples was significantly high on Lowenstein-Jensen medium compared to Middlebrook 7H11 agar and Stonebrink (SB) media. The disease is transmissible from fish to fish and also from fish to human, so the significance of Mycobacteria in ornamental fish should not be overlooked.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Comp Med. 2000 Dec;50(6):666-72 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jan;36(1):139-47 PubMed

Comp Med. 2001 Apr;51(2):171-5 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jun;49(6):2296-303 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Feb;39(2):710-5 PubMed

Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;16(2):294-6 PubMed

BMC Public Health. 2011 May 16;11:320 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Dec;34(12):2963-7 PubMed

Dis Aquat Organ. 2004 Oct 21;61(1-2):41-51 PubMed

Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 15;42(12):1756-63 PubMed

Can J Microbiol. 1966 Aug;12(4):715-23 PubMed

Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Nov-Dec;7(6):1039-42 PubMed

Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993 Jul;43(3):482-9 PubMed

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000 Apr;36(4):225-35 PubMed

Can J Microbiol. 1979 Feb;25(2):217-26 PubMed

J Comp Pathol. 1990 Apr;102(3):335-44 PubMed

Vet Med (Praha). 1997 Apr;42(4):111-23 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Nov;54(Pt 6):2095-2105 PubMed

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010 Sep;14(9):1176-80 PubMed

Vet Microbiol. 1997 Nov;58(2-4):229-37 PubMed

Vet Res Commun. 2004 Aug;28 Suppl 1:315-7 PubMed

Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Oct;16(10):1576-83 PubMed

J Fish Dis. 2003 Apr;26(4):241-5 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Sep;40(9):3374-80 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Nov;68(11):5281-7 PubMed

Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(4):108-14 PubMed

Nejnovějších 20 citací...

Zobrazit více v
Medvik | PubMed

The influence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria on the interaction of opportunistic microorganisms with erythrocytes

. 2020 Apr ; 65 (2) : 417-421. [epub] 20190911

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...