Evaluation of the strain identity between isolates from caries lesions and root canals in early childhood caries cases
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- DNA fingerprinting MeSH
- kavita zubní dřeně mikrobiologie MeSH
- Lactococcus klasifikace genetika izolace a purifikace fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ribotypizace MeSH
- Streptococcus klasifikace genetika izolace a purifikace fyziologie MeSH
- techniky typizace bakterií MeSH
- zubní kaz mikrobiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Early childhood caries (ECC) has become a serious medical problem worldwide in the last decade. Bacterial microflora of the dental plaque and oral cavity is considered an important factor in the formation and progression of dental caries. The aim of this study was strain typing and comparison of bacterial isolates retrieved from caries lesions and root canal contents of the same teeth. In total, 18 pairs of presumptive streptococci and lactobacilli retrieved from dental caries and root canals isolated from ECC-affected children, were selected on the basis of biotyping results and rep-PCR fingerprinting with (GTG)5 primer. Strain typing was further done using the RiboPrinter microbial characterization system (DuPont Qualicon). The automated ribotyping determined 14 pairs of the strains (77.8 %) to be identical. The results obtained confirmed that identical bacterial strains colonized both the decayed dental surface and the necrotic content of the dental pulp cavity during the cariogenesis. Our finding supports the assumption that bacteria could penetrate through the damaged dental surface to the inner parts of the teeth.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jul;7(3):311-27 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 2008 Jul;57(Pt 7):891-895 PubMed
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 24;12:547 PubMed
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008 Sep;9(3):114-25 PubMed
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008 Nov;94(4):573-9 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 2006 Aug;55(Pt 8):1135-1140 PubMed
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2010 Jun;98(1):85-92 PubMed
Eur J Oral Sci. 2003 Oct;111(5):383-9 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2009;54(1):53-8 PubMed
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Mar;48(3):195-9 PubMed
Int Endod J. 1992 Jan;25(1):2-5 PubMed
Microb Drug Resist. 2003 Fall;9(3):307-12 PubMed
Caries Res. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):173-81 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Oct;15(4):613-30 PubMed
Public Health Rep. 2010 Nov-Dec;125(6):817-30 PubMed
Med Sci Monit. 2007 Nov;13(11):RA196-203 PubMed
Br Dent J. 2006 Mar 25;200(6):313-20 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Jun;40(6):1977-84 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Nov;48(11):4121-8 PubMed
J Dent Educ. 2001 Oct;65(10):1028-37 PubMed
Arch Oral Biol. 2006 Nov;51(11):1024-8 PubMed
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Sep 6;293(6547):581-3 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1998 Jun;66(6):2595-600 PubMed
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008 Sep;18(5):361-7 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Mar;40(3):1001-9 PubMed
Evaluation of biochemical and molecular methods for Lactobacillus reuteri strains differentiation
