INTRODUCTION: Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is a widespread phenomenon in animals including mammals. It has been demonstrated that across species, the direction and magnitude of sexual dimorphism in body size often corresponds to social systems. Moreover, many animal lineages conform to "Rensch's rule", which states that male-biased SSD increases with body size. We tested whether considerable differences in sociality and large variation in body size were connected with the evolution of SSD in the structural body size of ground squirrels, an otherwise ecologically relatively homogenous group of terrestrial rodents. RESULTS: We found the general trend of male-biased SSD in ground squirrels, however, male size increases nearly perfectly isometrically with female size among species and sociality does not explain departures from this relationship. Species with different sociality grades significantly differ in body size, with the most social species tending to be the largest. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that lack of conformity with Rensch´s rule in ground squirrels may be attributed to their low variation in SSD, and briefly discuss three potential causes of small magnitude of SSD in the structural size in rodents: low selection on SSD in structural dimensions, ontogenetic and genetic constraints and the existence of ecological/selection factors preventing the evolution of extensive SSD.

Departments of Zoology and Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Viničná 7 128 44 Praha 2 Czech Republic

Karlovy Vary Museum Pod Jelením skokem 30 360 01 Karlovy Vary Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Darwin CR. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray; 1871.

Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T. Sex, size, and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

Lindenfors P, Gittelman JL, Jones KE. In: Sex, size, and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Sexual size dimorphism in mammals; pp. 16–26.

Lindenfors P, Tullberg BS. Phylogenetic analyses of primate size evolution: the consequences of sexual selection. Biol J Linn Soc. 1998;64:413–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1998.tb00342.x. DOI

Lindenfors P, Tullberg BS, Biuw M. Phylogenetic analyses of sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in pinnipeds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2002;52:188–193. doi: 10.1007/s00265-002-0507-x. DOI

Pérez-Barbería FJ, Gordon IJ, Pagel M. The origins of sexual dimorphism in body size in ungulates. Evolution. 2002;56:1276–1285. PubMed

Rensch B. Die Abhängigkeit der relativen Sexualdifferenz von der Körpergrösse. Bonner Zool Beitr. 1950;1:58–69.

Fairbairn DJ. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1997;28:659–687. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.659. DOI

Abouheif E, Fairbairn DJ. A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: assessing Rensch’s rule. Am Nat. 1997;149:340–362.

Starostová Z, Kubička L, Kratochvíl L. Macroevolutionary pattern of sexual size dimorphism in geckos corresponds to intraspecific temperature-induced variation. J Evol Biol. 2010;23:670–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01933.x. PubMed DOI

Shulte-Hostedde AI. In: Rodent societies: An ecological and evolutionary perspective. Wolff JO, Sherman PW, editor. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 2007. Sexual size dimorphism in Rodents; pp. 115–128.

McKenna MC, Bell SK. Classification of mammals above the species level. New York: Columbia University Press; 1997.

Herron MD, Castoe TA, Parkinson CL. Sciurid phylogeny and the paraphyly of Holarctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus) Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004;31:1015–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.09.015. PubMed DOI

Fabre P-H, Hautier L, Dimitrov D, Douzery EJP. A glimpse on the pattern of rodent diversification: a phylogenetic approach. BMC Evol Biol. 2012;12:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-88. PubMed DOI PMC

Nowak RM. Walker’s mammals of the world. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999.

Bibikow DI. Die Murmeltiere der Welt. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag; 1996.

Armitage KB. Sociality as a life-history tactic of ground squirrels. Oecol. 1981;48:36–49. doi: 10.1007/BF00346986. PubMed DOI

Michener GR. In: Advances in the Study of Mammalian Behavior. Eisenberg JF, Kleiman DG, editor. Lawrence: American Society of Mammalogists; 1983. Kin identification, matriarchies, and the evolution of sociality in ground-dwelling sciurids; pp. 528–572. [Special Publication No. 7]

Best TL, Titus AS, Caesar K, Lewis CL. Ammospermophilus harrisii. Mamm Species. 1990;366:1–7.

Best TL, Caesar K, Titus AS, Lewis CL. Ammospermophilus insularis. Mamm Species. 1990;364:1–4.

Best TL, Lewis CL, Caesar K, Titus AS. Ammospermophilus interpres. Mamm Species. 1990;365:1–6.

Belk MC, Smith DH. Ammospermophilus leucurus. Mamm Species. 1991;368:1–8.

Helgen KM, Cole RF, Helgen LE, Wilson DE. Generic revision in the holoarctic ground squirrels genus Spermophilus. J Mamm. 2009;90:270–305. doi: 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-309.1. DOI

Ceballos G, Wilson DE. Cynomys mexicanus. Mamm Species. 1985;248:1–3.

Linzey AV, Rosmarino N, Willson K, Roth E, Hammerson G, Cannings S. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. IUCN; 2010. Cynomys parvidens. [ http://www.iucnredlist.org]

Blumstein DT, Armitage KB. Does sociality drive the evolution of communicative complexity? A comparative test with ground-dwelling sciurid alarm calls. Am Nat. 1997;150:179–200. doi: 10.1086/286062. PubMed DOI

Allainé D. Sociality, mating system and reproductive skew in marmots: evidence and hypotheses. Behav Process. 2000;51:21–34. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00116-9. PubMed DOI

Oaks E, Young PJ, Kirkland GL, Schmidt DF. Spermophilus variegatus. Mamm Species. 1987;272:1–8.

Popov VS. Rol’ social’nyh svjazej v prostranstvennoj strukture poselenija zheltogo suslika. [The role of social relationships in the spatial structure of the colony in the yellow ground squirrel (Spermophilus fulvus Licht. 1823)] PhD thesis. Moscow State University; 2007.

Kucheruk VV, Khlyap LA. Lagomorphs and Rodents of Middle Asia (Zairseobraznye I Gryzuny Sredney Azii) Moscow: Geos; 2005.

Soldatova AN. Vlijanie plotnosti naselenia na charakter ispolzovanija territorii malym suslikom [Effect of population density on the character of the utilization of home ranges by Citellus pygmaeus Pall.] Zool Zh. 1962;41:913–921.

Kryštufek B, Vohralík V. Mammals of Turkey and Cyprus, Vol. 2, Rodentia I: Sciuridae, Dipodidae, Gliridae, Arvicolinae. Koper: Science and Research Centre of the Republic of Slovenia; 2005.

Gür MK, Gür H. Spermophilus xanthoprymnus. Mamm Species. 1995;864:183–194.

Best TL. Spermophilus mohavensis. Mamm Species. 1995;509:1–7.

Webb TJ, Freckleton RP. Only half right: species with female-biased sexual size dimorphism consistently break Rensch's rule. PLoS One. 2007;2:e897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000897. PubMed DOI PMC

Tubaro PL, Bertelli S. Female-biased sexual size dimorphism in tinamous: a comparative test fails to support Rensch's rule. Biol J Linn Soc. 2003;80:519–527. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00252.x. DOI

Stuart-Fox D. A test of Rensch’s rule in dwarf chameleons (Bradypodion spp.), a group with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Evol Ecol. 2009;23:425–433. doi: 10.1007/s10682-008-9242-8. DOI

Reiss MJ. Sexual dimorphism in body size: Are larger species more dimorphic? J Theor Biol. 1986;121:163–172. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80090-X. DOI

Székely T, Lislevand T, Figuerola J. In: Sex, size and gender roles. Fairbairn D, Székely T, Blackenhorn W, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Sexual size dimorphism in birds; pp. 27–37.

Lacey EA, Wieczorek JR. Territoriality and male reproductive success in arctic ground squirrels. Behav Ecol. 2001;12:626–632. doi: 10.1093/beheco/12.5.626. DOI

Hoogland JL. Sexual dimorphism of prairie dogs. J Mamm. 2003;84:1254–1266. doi: 10.1644/BME-008. DOI

Schwagmeyer PL. Scramble-competition polygyny in an asocial mammal: Male mobility and mating success. Am Nat. 1988;131:885–892. doi: 10.1086/284828. DOI

Polák J, Frynta D. Sexual size dimorphism in domestic goats, sheep, and their wild relatives. Biol J Linn Soc. 2009;98:872–883. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01294.x. DOI

Frynta D, Baudyšová J, Hradcová P, Faltusová K, Kratochvíl L. Allometry of sexual size dimorphism in domestic dog. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046125. PubMed DOI PMC

Maynard-Smith J. The evolution of sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1978.

Lande R. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution. 1980;34:292–305. doi: 10.2307/2407393. PubMed DOI

Dobson FS, Michener GR. Maternal traits and reproduction in Richardson's ground squirrels. Ecology. 1995;76:851–862. doi: 10.2307/1939350. DOI

Huber S, Millesi E, Walzl M, Dittami J, Arnold W. Reproductive effort and costs of reproduction in female European ground squirrels. Oecologia. 1999;121:19–24. doi: 10.1007/s004420050902. PubMed DOI

Sauer JR, Slade NA. Uinta ground squirrel demography: is body mass a better categorical variable than age? Ecology. 1987;68:642–650. doi: 10.2307/1938469. DOI

Barash D. Marmots: Social behavior and ecology. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1989.

Hoogland JL. Cynomys ludovicianus. Mamm Species. 1996;535:1–10.

Hayssen V. Patterns of body and tail length and body mass in Sciuridae. J Mamm. 2008;89:852–873. doi: 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-217.1. DOI

Thorington RW, Jr, Koprowski JL, Steele MA, Whatton JF. Squirrels of the World. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press; 2012.

Gür H. Why do Anatolian ground squirrels exhibit a Bergmannian size pattern? A phylogenetic comparative analysis of geographic variation in body size. Biol J Linn Soc. 2010;100:695–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01447.x. DOI

Millesi E, Strijkstra AM, Hoffmann IE, Ditami JP, Daan S. Sex and age differences in mass, morphology, and annual cycle in European ground squirrels, Spermophilus citellus. J Mamm. 1999;80:218–231. doi: 10.2307/1383222. DOI

Zimmerman EG. Growth and age determination in the thirteen-lined ground squirrel, Spermophilus tridecemlineatus. Am Midl Nat. 1972;87:314–325. doi: 10.2307/2423564. DOI

Turner BN, Iverson SL, Severson KL. Postnatal growth and development of captive franklin's ground squirrels (Spermophilus franklinii) Am midl nat. 1976;95:93–102. doi: 10.2307/2424236. DOI

Kratochvíl L, Fokt M, Rehák I, Frynta D. Misinterpretation of character scaling: A tale of sexual dimorphism in body shape of common lizards. Can J Zool. 2003;81:1112–1117. doi: 10.1139/z03-078. DOI

Waterman JM. In: Rodent Societes: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Wolff JO, Sherman PW, editor. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 2007. Male mating strategies in rodents; pp. 27–41.

Rowell TE. Beyond the one-male group. Behaviour. 1988;104:189–201. doi: 10.1163/156853988X00511. DOI

Martins EP, Hansen TF. Phylogenies and the comparative method: A general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat. 1997;149:646–667. doi: 10.1086/286013. DOI

Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat. 1985;125:1–15. doi: 10.1086/284325. DOI

Pagel MD. In: Morphology, shape and phylogeny. MacLeod N, Foley PL, editor. London: Taylor & Francis; 2002. Modelling the evolution of continuously varying characters on phylogenetic trees; pp. 269–286.

Best TL, Titus AS, Lewis CL, Caesar K. Ammospermophilus nelsoni. Mamm Species. 1990;367:1–7.

Díaz-Uriarte R, Garland T. Effects of branch length errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol. 1998;47:654–672. doi: 10.1080/106351598260653. PubMed DOI

Díaz-Uriarte R, Garland T. Testing hypotheses of correlated evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts: Sensitivity to deviations from Brownian motion. Syst Biol. 1996;45:27–47. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/45.1.27. DOI

Revell LJ. Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Meth Ecol Evol. 2010;1:319–329. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00044.x. DOI

Capellini I, Venditti C, Barton RA. Phylogeny and metabolic scaling in mammals. Ecology. 2010;91:2783–2793. doi: 10.1890/09-0817.1. PubMed DOI

Capellini I, Venditti C, Barton RA. Placentation and maternal investment in mammals. Am Nat. 2011;177:86–98. doi: 10.1086/657435. PubMed DOI

Matthews LJ, Amold C, Machanda Z, Nunn CL. Primate extinction risk and historical patterns of speciation and extinction in relation to body mass. Proc R Soc B. 2011;278:1256–1263. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1489. PubMed DOI PMC

Midford PET, Garland T, Maddison WP. PDAP Package of Mesquite. Version 1.07. [ http://mesquiteproject.org]

Maddison WP, Maddison DR. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.75. [ http://mesquiteproject.org]

Martins EP. COMPARE, Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. version 4.6b. [ http://compare.bio.indiana.edu/]

Pagel M, Meade A. BayesTraits version 1.0 computer package. [ http://www.evolution.rdg.ac.uk]

Absolute, not relative brain size correlates with sociality in ground squirrels