A tailored approach to reduce dose of anti-TNF drugs may be equally effective, but substantially less costly than standard dosing in patients with ankylosing spondylitis over 1 year: a propensity score-matched cohort study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Observational Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
25165033
DOI
10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205202
PII: S0003-4967(24)02006-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Ankylosing Spondylitis, Anti-TNF, Treatment,
- MeSH
- Adalimumab administration & dosage economics MeSH
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing drug therapy economics MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents administration & dosage economics MeSH
- C-Reactive Protein metabolism MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Etanercept administration & dosage economics MeSH
- Infliximab administration & dosage economics MeSH
- Quality-Adjusted Life Years MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Drug Costs MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Area Under Curve MeSH
- Disability Evaluation MeSH
- Disease-Free Survival MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Propensity Score MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha antagonists & inhibitors MeSH
- Maintenance Chemotherapy economics MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Adalimumab MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents MeSH
- C-Reactive Protein MeSH
- Etanercept MeSH
- Infliximab MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, safety and costs of standard versus individually tailored reduced doses of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after achieving low-disease activity. METHODS: This was a single-centre prospective observational study performed within the ATTRA registry. The anti-TNF dose tapering strategy was chosen by treating physicians, without prespecified protocol. We used propensity score (PS) methodology to identify two cohorts of patients matched for relevant baseline characteristics who were treated with either reduced (n=53) or standard (n=83) doses of TNF inhibitors. One-year outcomes and costs of anti-TNF drugs were compared between both PS-matched cohorts. RESULTS: In the reduced dosing group, the median dose of TNF inhibitor corresponded to 0.67 and 0.5 of the standard dose initially and at 12 months respectively, and 21% of patients required return to standard dosing regimen. The mean change per year in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index, C-reactive protein , Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and Bath AS functional index, as well as quality-adjusted life-year area under the curve were no different between both groups. The HR (95% CI) of reduced versus standard dosing group for relapse and any adverse event was 1.46 (0.66 to 3.19) and 0.56 (0.22 to 1.44), respectively. Mean difference (95% CI) in cost of anti-TNF drugs was €-4214 (-4707 to -3701) per year of treatment in favour of reduced dosing strategy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AS after reaching low-disease activity, a tailored approach to reduce doses of anti-TNF drugs produced similar clinical outcomes at 1 year, but was substantially less costly.
References provided by Crossref.org