• This record comes from PubMed

Hippocampal spatial position evaluation on MRI for research and clinical practice

. 2014 ; 9 (12) : e115174. [epub] 20141212

Language English Country United States Media electronic-ecollection

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

In clinical practice as well as in many volumetric studies we use different reorientations of the brain position towards x and y axis on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. In order to find out whether it has an overall effect on the resulting 2D data, manual hippocampal area measurements and rotation variability of the brain (in two reoriented axes) and the skull were performed in 23 Alzheimer's disease patients and 31 healthy controls. After the MRI scanning, native brain scans (nat) were reoriented into the two different artificial planes (anterior commissure-posterior commissure axis (AC-PC) and hippocampal horizontal long axis (hipp)). Hippocampal area and temporal horn of the lateral ventricle was measured manually using freeware Image J program. We found that 1) hippocampal area of nat images is larger compared to hipp images, area of the nat images is equal to the AC-PC images and area of the hipp images is smaller compared to AC-PC images, 2) hippocampal area together with the area of the temporal horn for nat images is larger compared to hipp images, area of the hipp images is smaller compared to the AC-PC images and area of the nat images is smaller compared to the AC-PC images. The conclusion is that the measured area of the hippocampus in the native MRI is almost the same as the area of MRI reoriented only into the AC-PC axis. Therefore, when performing 2D area studies of the hippocampus or in the clinical practice we recommend usage of not-reoriented MRI images or to reorient them into the AC-PC axis. Surprising finding was that rotation of both AC-PC and hipp line towards x-axis among patients varies up to 35° and the same is true for the skull rotation so that it is not only a matter of the brain position.

See more in PubMed

Scher AI, Xu Y, Korf ES, White LR, Scheltens P, et al. (2007) Hippocampal shape analysis in Alzheimer's disease: a population-based study. Neuroimage 36:8–18. PubMed

Mrzilkova J, Zach P, Bartos A, Tintera J, Ripova D (2012) Volumetric analysis of the pons, cerebellum and hippocampi in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 34:224–234. PubMed

Westman E, Cavallin L, Muehlboeck JS, Zhang Y, Mecocci P, et al. (2011) Sensitivity and specificity of medial temporal lobe visual ratings and multivariate regional MRI classification in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One 6:e22506. PubMed PMC

Cerbai F, Lana D, Nosi D, Petkova-Kirova P, Zecchi S, et al. (2012) The neuron-astrocyte-microglia triad in normal brain ageing and in a model of neuroinflammation in the rat hippocampus. PLoS One 7:e45250. PubMed PMC

McGonigle DJ, Howseman AM, Athwal BS, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS, et al. (2000) Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersession differences. Neuroimage 11:708–734. PubMed

Raemaekers M, du Plessis S, Ramsey NF, Weusten JM, Vink M (2012) Test-retest variability underlying fMRI measurements. Neuroimage 60:717–727. PubMed

Soltysik DA, Thomasson D, Rajan S, Gonzalez-Castillo J, DiCamillo P, et al. (2011) Head-repositioning does not reduce the reproducibility of fMRI activation in a block-design motor task. Neuroimage 56:1329–1337. PubMed PMC

Oksengard AR, Cavallin L, Axelsson R, Andersson C, Nagga K, et al. (2010) Lack of accuracy for the proposed ‘Dubois criteria’ in Alzheimer's disease: a validation study from the Swedish brain power initiative. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 30:374–380. PubMed

Maller JJ, Reglade-Meslin C, Anstey KJ, Sachdev P (2006) Sex and symmetry differences in hippocampal volumetrics: before and beyond the opening of the crus of the fornix. Hippocampus 16:80–90. PubMed

Bozoki AC, Korolev IO, Davis NC, Hoisington LA, Berger KL (2012) Disruption of limbic white matter pathways in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a DTI/FDG-PET study. Hum Brain Mapp 33:1792–1802. PubMed PMC

Hayashi T, Wada A, Uchida N, Kitagaki H (2009) Enlargement of the hippocampal angle: a new index of Alzheimer disease. Magn Reson Med Sci 8:33–38. PubMed

Scheltens P, Leys D, Barkhof F, Huglo D, Weinstein HC, et al. (1992) Atrophy of medial temporal lobes on MRI in “probable” Alzheimer's disease and normal ageing: diagnostic value and neuropsychological correlates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:967–972. PubMed PMC

Teipel SJ, Ewers M, Wolf S, Jessen F, Kolsch H, et al. (2010) Multicentre variability of MRI-based medial temporal lobe volumetry in Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatry Res 182:244–250. PubMed

Fleisher AS, Sun S, Taylor C, Ward CP, Gamst AC, et al. (2008) Volumetric MRI vs clinical predictors of Alzheimer disease in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 70:191–199. PubMed

McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, et al. (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 34:939–944. PubMed

Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Dekosky ST, Barberger-Gateau P, et al. (2007) Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 6:734–746. PubMed

Geuze E, Vermetten E, Bremner JD (2005) MR-based in vivo hippocampal volumetrics: 1. Review of methodologies currently employed. Mol Psychiatry 10:147–159. PubMed

Finlay LM (1980) Craniometry and cephalometry: a history prior to the advent of radiography. The Angle Orthodontist 50:312–321. PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...