The characteristics of diabetic residents in European nursing homes: results from the SHELTER study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
25533147
DOI
10.1016/j.jamda.2014.11.009
PII: S1525-8610(14)00756-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Diabetes mellitus, nursing home, older adults,
- MeSH
- Diabetes Mellitus diagnosis epidemiology MeSH
- Long-Term Care MeSH
- Homes for the Aged * MeSH
- Geriatric Assessment MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Diabetes Complications diagnosis epidemiology MeSH
- Quality of Life * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Linear Models MeSH
- Logistic Models MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Multivariate Analysis MeSH
- Statistics, Nonparametric MeSH
- Nursing Homes * MeSH
- Prevalence MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Sex Distribution MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Age Distribution MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe epidemiology MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in European nursing homes (NHs), and the health and functional characteristics of diabetic residents (DMR) aged 60 years and older. DESIGN: Between 2009 and 2011, the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) project, a 12-month prospective cohort study, was conducted to assess NH residents across different health care systems in 7 European countries and Israel. METHODS: The study included 59 NHs in 8 countries with a total of 4037 residents living in or admitted to a NH during the 3-month enrollment period. The multidimensional InterRAI instrument for Long-Term Care Facilities (InterRAI-LTCF) was used to assess health and functional status among residents. Descriptive statistics and linear, ordinal, and logistic regression were used to perform the analyses. RESULTS: We found a 21.8% prevalence of DM among NH residents. Residents with DM (DMRs) were significantly younger compared with non-DMRs (82.3, SD ± 7.7; 84.6, SD ± 8.4; P < .001). DMRs were more frequently overweight or obese, and presented more often with ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and stroke than residents without DM. DMRs also took more drugs, had pressure ulcers (PU) or other wounds more often, and more frequently had urinary incontinence (UI); they also reported worse self-perceived health. DM independently of other factors increased risk of PU occurrence (odds ratio 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.86; P = .036) and decreased probability of higher pain scores (B = -0.28; 95% CI -0.41 to -0.14; P < .001). DM was not associated with ADL dependency, cognitive impairment, and depression in NH residents. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of DM in European NH residents is comparable to US national NH surveys, and to UK and German NH data based on glucose-level testing. DMRs compared with non-DMRs have more comorbid conditions, and a particularly higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases and obesity, PU, and severe UI. DMRs should be regarded as a specific group of residents who require an interdisciplinary approach in medical and nursing care.
Agaplesion Bethesda Clinic Geriatric Centre Ulm Alb Donau University of Ulm Ulm Germany
Centro Medicina dell'Invecchiamento Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
Department of Geriatrics 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Unit for Ageing and Services National Institute for Health and Welfare Helsinki Finland
References provided by Crossref.org