Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Exhaled Breath for the Identification of Volatile Organic Compound Biomarkers in Esophageal and Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Adenocarcinoma diagnosis metabolism MeSH
- Breath Tests MeSH
- Mass Spectrometry * MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Decision Support Techniques MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor metabolism MeSH
- Esophageal Neoplasms diagnosis metabolism MeSH
- Stomach Neoplasms diagnosis metabolism MeSH
- ROC Curve MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Case-Control Studies MeSH
- Volatile Organic Compounds metabolism MeSH
- Exhalation MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Biomarkers, Tumor MeSH
- Volatile Organic Compounds MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The present study assessed whether exhaled breath analysis using Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry could distinguish esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma from noncancer controls. BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer present with advanced disease, resulting in poor long-term survival rates. Novel methods are needed to diagnose potentially curable upper gastrointestinal malignancies. METHODS: A Profile-3 Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry instrument was used for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) within exhaled breath samples. All study participants had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy on the day of breath sampling. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and a diagnostic risk prediction model were used to assess the discriminatory accuracy of the identified VOCs. RESULTS: Exhaled breath samples were analyzed from 81 patients with esophageal (N = 48) or gastric adenocarcinoma (N = 33) and 129 controls including Barrett's metaplasia (N = 16), benign upper gastrointestinal diseases (N = 62), or a normal upper gastrointestinal tract (N = 51). Twelve VOCs-pentanoic acid, hexanoic acid, phenol, methyl phenol, ethyl phenol, butanal, pentanal, hexanal, heptanal, octanal, nonanal, and decanal-were present at significantly higher concentrations (P < 0.05) in the cancer groups than in the noncancer controls. The area under the ROC curve using these significant VOCs to discriminate esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma from those with normal upper gastrointestinal tracts was 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for the model and validation subsets of the diagnostic prediction model was 0.92 ± 0.01 and 0.87 ± 0.03, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct exhaled breath VOC profiles can distinguish patients with esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma from noncancer controls.
References provided by Crossref.org
VOCs Sensing by Metal Oxides, Conductive Polymers, and Carbon-Based Materials